Literature DB >> 23657401

Normal values and pressure morphology for three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry of asymptomatic adults: a study in 110 subjects.

Yuwei Li1, Xiaoqing Yang, Chen Xu, Yi Zhang, Xipeng Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate normal values and pressure morphology of three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D-HRM) in asymptomatic volunteers and to determine the relationship between objective measurable values, gender, and age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anorectal pressures and rectal sensation were evaluated in 110 asymptomatic volunteers (46 females and 64 males) ranging in age from 18 to 80 years (median age, 52 years) in left lateral position by three-dimensional high-resolution manometry.
RESULTS: Maximum squeeze pressure, residual anal pressure, and intrarectal pressure were significantly higher in males compared to females (p < 0.05 each). Duration of sustained squeeze was significantly lower in males compared to females (p < 0.05). Maximum resting pressure, mean resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure were inversely correlated (r = -0.310, p < 0.01, r = -0.276, p < 0.01, and r = -0.198, p < 0.05) with age. The value of rectoanal pressure differential was -13.1 ± 5.8 mmHg which was negative during defecation. Overall variation coefficient in anorectal pressures ranged between 0.21 and 0.34.
CONCLUSION: This study establishes normal values for anorectal pressure by 3D-HRM in asymptomatic volunteers. There are significant gender differences concerning squeeze patterns. Increasing age is associated with lower maximum resting pressure, mean resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure. Normal characteristic pressure morphology of anorectum can be obtained at rest, during squeeze, and bear down as in defecation by 3D-HRM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657401     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1706-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  27 in total

Review 1.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. American Gastroenterological Association.

Authors:  J L Barnett; W L Hasler; M Camilleri
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Minimum standards of anorectal manometry.

Authors:  S S C Rao; F Azpiroz; N Diamant; P Enck; G Tougas; A Wald
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Functional correlates of anal canal anatomy: puborectalis muscle and anal canal pressure.

Authors:  Jianmin Liu; Noelani Guaderrama; Charles W Nager; Dolores H Pretorius; Sonali Master; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Effect of aging on anorectal and pelvic floor functions in females.

Authors:  Jean C Fox; Joel G Fletcher; Alan R Zinsmeister; Barb Seide; Stephen J Riederer; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R C Arndorfer; J J Stef; W J Dodds; J H Linehan; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Differences in the pressures of canal anal and rectal sensitivity in patients with fecal incontinence, chronic constipation and healthy subjects.

Authors:  C Ciriza-de-Los-Ríos; A Ruiz-de-León-San-Juan; M Díaz-Rubio García; E Tomás-Moros; F García-Durán; T Muñoz-Yagüe; F Canga-Rodríguez-Valcárcel; A Gómez-de-la-Cámara; G Castellano-Tortajada
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 7.  Advances in diagnostic assessment of fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Anal canal pressure profile: a reappraisal as determined by rapid pullthrough technique.

Authors:  S M McHugh; N E Diamant
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination.

Authors:  S S Rao; K D Welcher; J S Leistikow
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Effect of aging on anorectal function.

Authors:  J J Bannister; L Abouzekry; N W Read
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  High resolution and high definition anorectal manometry and pressure topography: diagnostic advance or a new kid on the block?

Authors:  Yeong Yeh Lee; Askin Erdogan; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry - New Insights in the Diagnostic Assessment of Functional Anorectal Disorders.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Benjamin Misselwitz
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 3.  Current aspects and future prospects of total anorectal reconstruction--a critical and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Roman A Inglin; Daniel Eberli; Lukas E Brügger; Tullio Sulser; Norman S Williams; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Three-Dimensional Anorectal Manometry Findings in Primigravida.

Authors:  D P Wickramasinghe; C S Perera; H Senanayake; D N Samarasekera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Three-Dimensional Anorectal Manometry Enhances Diagnostic Gain by Detecting Sphincter Defects and Puborectalis Pressure.

Authors:  Shreya Raja; Francis C Okeke; Ellen M Stein; Sameer Dhalla; Monica Nandwani; Kristle L Lynch; C Prakash Gyawali; John O Clarke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  High-resolution anorectal manometry: An expensive hobby or worth every penny?

Authors:  G Basilisco; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte Andrianjafy; Laure Luciano; Camille Bazin; Karine Baumstarck; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Anorectal manometric parameters are influenced by gender and age in subjects with normal bowel function.

Authors:  Hyang Ran Lee; Seok-Byung Lim; Jeong Yun Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Authors:  Emma V Carrington; S Mark Scott; Adil Bharucha; François Mion; Jose M Remes-Troche; Allison Malcolm; Henriette Heinrich; Mark Fox; Satish S Rao
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Clinical and manometric characteristics of women with paradoxical puborectalis syndrome.

Authors:  Vikram Rangan; Mohammed Zakari; William Hirsch; Sarah Ballou; Prashant Singh; Thomas Sommers; Johanna Iturrino; Judy Nee; Kyle Staller; Anthony Lembo
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.