Literature DB >> 3070012

Development of a self-administered questionnaire to measure women's knowledge of prenatal screening and diagnostic tests.

T M Marteau1, M Johnston, M Plenicar, R W Shaw, J Slack.   

Abstract

A prerequisite to an informed decision to undergo any screening or diagnostic test is knowledge about such a test. This study describes the development of a self-administered questionnaire to measure knowledge of prenatal tests, for use in studies concerning the uptake of these tests. Both the reliability (internal and test-retest) and predictive validity are evaluated. Validity is assessed in two studies: first, comparison is made between three criterion groups (two with experience of pregnancy, one without); and second, scores on the questionnaire are compared before and after women have been provided with information about possible tests. The results show this to be both a reliable and valid measure of knowledge about prenatal tests. The results also highlight aspects of knowledge that are lacking. For example, a sizeable minority of women were uncertain or incorrect in identifying which tests they had undergone in a recent pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3070012     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(88)90023-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  15 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.

Authors:  D S King
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  A measure of informed choice.

Authors:  T M Marteau; E Dormandy; S Michie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests.

Authors:  W Graham; P Smith; A Kamal; A Fitzmaurice; N Smith; N Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-15

4.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  "Testing times, challenging choices": an Australian study of prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Jan M Hodgson; Lynn H Gillam; Margaret A Sahhar; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Prenatal cystic fibrosis carrier testing: designing an information leaflet to meet the specific needs of the target population.

Authors:  M E Mennie; W A Liston; D J Brock
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Update and Review: Maternal Serum Screening.

Authors:  K E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Elective amniocentesis in low-risk pregnancies: decision making in the era of information and uncertainty.

Authors:  Y Lesser; J Rabinowitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Pre-screening education in multiple marker screening programs: The effect on patient anxiety and knowledge.

Authors:  K E Ormond; E Pergament; B A Fine
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.