Literature DB >> 30694728

Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.

Brian O Bernstein1, David Lubinski1, Camilla P Benbow1.   

Abstract

This investigation examined whether math/scientific and verbal/humanistic ability and preference constellations, developed on intellectually talented 13-year-olds to predict their educational outcomes at age 23, continue to maintain their longitudinal potency by distinguishing distinct forms of eminence 35 years later. Eminent individuals were defined as those who, by age 50, had accomplished something rare: creative and highly impactful careers (e.g., full professors at research-intensive universities, Fortune 500 executives, distinguished judges and lawyers, leaders in biomedicine, award-winning journalists and writers). Study 1 consisted of 677 intellectually precocious youths, assessed at age 13, whose leadership and creative accomplishments were assessed 35 years later. Study 2 constituted a constructive replication-an analysis of 605 top science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) graduate students, assessed on the same predictor constructs early in graduate school and assessed again 25 years later. In both samples, the same ability and preference parameter values, which defined math/scientific versus verbal/humanistic constellations, discriminated participants who ultimately achieved distinct forms of eminence from their peers pursuing other life endeavors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. P. Snow’s two cultures; constructive replication; creativity; eminence; individual differences; intelligence

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694728      PMCID: PMC6419263          DOI: 10.1177/0956797618822524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  17 in total

1.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies.

Authors:  David H Uttal; Nathaniel G Meadow; Elizabeth Tipton; Linda L Hand; Alison R Alden; Christopher Warren; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.

Authors:  Harrison J Kell; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow; James H Steiger
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07-11

3.  The science of patterns.

Authors:  L A Steen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Donna K Ginther; Shulamit Kahn; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2014-12

5.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Investment and intellect: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophie von Stumm; Phillip L Ackerman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Cognitive capitalism: the effect of cognitive ability on wealth, as mediated through scientific achievement and economic freedom.

Authors:  Heiner Rindermann; James Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-02

8.  Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise.

Authors:  David Lubinski; Camilla Persson Benbow
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-12

9.  Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity.

Authors:  Gregory Park; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10

10.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Brian O Bernstein; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2020-07-02

2.  Understanding educational, occupational, and creative outcomes requires assessing intraindividual differences in abilities and interests.

Authors:  David Lubinski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interest-Ability Profiles: An Integrative Approach to Knowledge Acquisition.

Authors:  William E Hyland; Kevin A Hoff; James Rounds
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2022-07-16

4.  Changing priorities in the development of cognitive competence and school learning: A general theory.

Authors:  Andreas Demetriou; George Charilaos Spanoudis; Samuel Greiff; Nikolaos Makris; Rita Panaoura; Smaragda Kazi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.