Literature DB >> 26151798

Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise.

David Lubinski1, Camilla Persson Benbow2.   

Abstract

This review provides an account of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) after 35 years of longitudinal research. Findings from recent 20-year follow-ups from three cohorts, plus 5- or 10-year findings from all five SMPY cohorts (totaling more than 5,000 participants), are presented. SMPY has devoted particular attention to uncovering personal antecedents necessary for the development of exceptional math-science careers and to developing educational interventions to facilitate learning among intellectually precocious youth. Along with mathematical gifts, high levels of spatial ability, investigative interests, and theoretical values form a particularly promising aptitude complex indicative of potential for developing scientific expertise and of sustained commitment to scientific pursuits. Special educational opportunities, however, can markedly enhance the development of talent. Moreover, extraordinary scientific accomplishments require extraordinary commitment both in and outside of school. The theory of work adjustment (TWA) is useful in conceptualizing talent identification and development and bridging interconnections among educational, counseling, and industrial psychology. The lens of TWA can clarify how some sex differences emerge in educational settings and the world of work. For example, in the SMPY cohorts, although more mathematically precocious males than females entered math-science careers, this does not necessarily imply a loss of talent because the women secured similar proportions of advanced degrees and high-level careers in areas more correspondent with the multidimensionality of their ability-preference pattern (e.g., administration, law, medicine, and the social sciences). By their mid-30s, the men and women appeared to be happy with their life choices and viewed themselves as equally successful (and objective measures support these subjective impressions). Given the ever-increasing importance of quantitative and scientific reasoning skills in modern cultures, when mathematically gifted individuals choose to pursue careers outside engineering and the physical sciences, it should be seen as a contribution to society, not a loss of talent.
© 2006 Association for Psychological Science.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 26151798     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  38 in total

1.  Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.

Authors:  Brian O Bernstein; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

2.  Examining Gender Inequality In A High School Engineering Course.

Authors:  Catherine Riegle-Crumb; Chelsea Moore
Journal:  Am J Eng Educ       Date:  2013

3.  Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin J Call; Wade Goodridge; Idalis Villanueva; Nicholas Wan; Kerry Jordan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.

Authors:  Diane F Halpern; Camilla P Benbow; David C Geary; Ruben C Gur; Janet Shibley Hyde; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2007-08-01

5.  Sex Differences in Math-Intensive Fields.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-10-01

6.  A twin study of the genetics of high cognitive ability selected from 11,000 twin pairs in six studies from four countries.

Authors:  Claire M A Haworth; Margaret J Wright; Nicolas W Martin; Nicholas G Martin; Dorret I Boomsma; Meike Bartels; Danielle Posthuma; Oliver S P Davis; Angela M Brant; Robin P Corley; John K Hewitt; William G Iacono; Matthew McGue; Lee A Thompson; Sara A Hart; Stephen A Petrill; David Lubinski; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  STEM Education.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Michael Fang; Kimberlee Shauman
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2015-05-04

8.  Beyond Performance: A Motivational Experiences Model of Stereotype Threat.

Authors:  Dustin B Thoman; Jessi L Smith; Elizabeth R Brown; Justin Chase; Joo Young K Lee
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-06-01

9.  The Mechanics of Human Achievement.

Authors:  Angela L Duckworth; Johannes C Eichstaedt; Lyle H Ungar
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2015-07

10.  Breadth-Based Models of Women's Underrepresentation in STEM Fields: An Integrative Commentary on Schmidt (2011) and Nye et al. (2012).

Authors:  Jeffrey M Valla; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.