Literature DB >> 34282562

Stimulus variability and task relevance modulate binding-learning.

Nithin George1, Tobias Egner2,3.   

Abstract

Classical theories of attention posit that integration of features into object representation (or feature binding) requires engagement of focused attention. Studies challenging this idea have demonstrated that feature binding can happen outside of the focus of attention for familiar objects, as well as for arbitrary color-orientation conjunctions. Detection performance for arbitrary feature conjunction improves with training, suggesting a potential role of perceptual learning mechanisms in the integration of features, a process called "binding-learning". In the present study, we investigate whether stimulus variability and task relevance, two critical determinants of visual perceptual learning, also modulate binding-learning. Transfer of learning in a visual search task to a pre-exposed color-orientation conjunction was assessed under conditions of varying stimulus variability and task relevance. We found transfer of learning for the pre-exposed feature conjunctions that were trained with high variability (Experiment 1). Transfer of learning was not observed when the conjunction was rendered task-irrelevant during training due to pop-out targets (Experiment 2). Our findings show that feature binding is determined by principles of perceptual learning, and they support the idea that functions traditionally attributed to goal-driven attention can be grounded in the learning of the statistical structure of the environment.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature binding; Habitual attention; Perceptual learning; Variability; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34282562     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02338-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  54 in total

1.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms.

Authors:  Sébastien M Crouzet; Holle Kirchner; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Attention facilitates multiple stimulus features in parallel in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Søren K Andersen; Steven A Hillyard; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning.

Authors:  M Ahissar; S Hochstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Feature-coding transitions to conjunction-coding with progression through human visual cortex.

Authors:  Rosemary A Cowell; Krystal R Leger; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  The time course of color- and luminance-based salience effects.

Authors:  Isabel C Dombrowe; Christian N L Olivers; Mieke Donk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-17

10.  The effects of stimulus variability on the perceptual learning of speech and non-speech stimuli.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.