Literature DB >> 22523399

Competition increases binding errors in visual working memory.

Stephen M Emrich1, Susanne Ferber.   

Abstract

When faced with maintaining multiple objects in visual working memory, item information must be bound to the correct object in order to be correctly recalled. Sometimes, however, binding errors occur, and participants report the feature (e.g., color) of an unprobed, non-target item. In the present study, we examine whether the configuration of sample stimuli affects the proportion of these binding errors. The results demonstrate that participants mistakenly report the identity of the unprobed item (i.e., they make a non-target response) when sample items are presented close together in space, suggesting that binding errors can increase independent of increases in memory load. Moreover, the proportion of these non-target responses is linearly related to the distance between sample items, suggesting that these errors are spatially specific. Finally, presenting sample items sequentially decreases non-target responses, suggesting that reducing competition between sample stimuli reduces the number of binding errors. Importantly, these effects all occurred without increases in the amount of error in the memory representation. These results suggest that competition during encoding can account for some of the binding errors made during VWM recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22523399     DOI: 10.1167/12.4.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  30 in total

1.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Location-based errors in change detection: A challenge for the slots model of visual working memory.

Authors:  Chris Donkin; Sophia Chi Tran; Mike Le Pelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

3.  Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

Review 4.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The precision of spatial selection into the focus of attention in working memory.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Mirko Thalmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

6.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Tuning perception: Visual working memory biases the quality of visual awareness.

Authors:  Christine M Salahub; Stephen M Emrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

8.  Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Sol Z Sun; Lauren Huxtable; Jay Pratt; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

9.  Working memory retrieval as a decision process.

Authors:  Benjamin Pearson; Julius Raskevicius; Paul M Bays; Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Swap errors in spatial working memory are guesses.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.