Literature DB >> 30690654

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for human reproduction and embryology presented at ASRM and ESHRE 2018.

Carol Lynn Curchoe1, Charles L Bormann2.   

Abstract

Sixteen artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches were reported at the 2018 annual congresses of the American Society for Reproductive Biology (9) and European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (7). Nearly every aspect of patient care was investigated, including sperm morphology, sperm identification, identification of empty or oocyte containing follicles, predicting embryo cell stages, predicting blastocyst formation from oocytes, assessing human blastocyst quality, predicting live birth from blastocysts, improving embryo selection, and for developing optimal IVF stimulation protocols. This represents a substantial increase in reports over 2017, where just one abstract each was reported at ASRM (AI) and ESHRE (ML). Our analysis reveals wide variability in how AI and ML methods are described (from not at all or very generic to fully describing the architectural framework) and large variability on accepted dataset sizes (from just 3 patients with 16 follicles in the smallest dataset to 661,060 images of 11,898 human embryos in one of the largest). AI and ML are clearly burgeoning methodologies in human reproduction and embryology and would benefit from early application of reporting standards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASHRE; ASRM; Artificial intelligence; Embryology; Human reproduction; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30690654      PMCID: PMC6504989          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01408-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  36 in total

1.  Full in vitro fertilization laboratory mechanization: toward robotic assisted reproduction?

Authors:  Marcos Meseguer; Ulrich Kruhne; Steen Laursen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  The application of neural networks in predicting the outcome of in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S J Kaufmann; J L Eastaugh; S Snowden; S W Smye; V Sharma
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Connie C Wong; Kevin E Loewke; Nancy L Bossert; Barry Behr; Christopher J De Jonge; Thomas M Baer; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Nicola Arroll; Lynsey M Cree; Vanessa Jordan; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-27

5.  Response: how PGS/PGT-a laboratories succeeded in losing all credibility.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Sarah Yarnal; Pedro A Martinez-Ortiz; Mark Hughes; Tony Gordon
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  A method for semi-automatic grading of human blastocyst microscope images.

Authors:  E Santos Filho; J A Noble; M Poli; T Griffiths; G Emerson; D Wells
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of  implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.

Authors:  N Basile; P Vime; M Florensa; B Aparicio Ruiz; J A García Velasco; J Remohí; M Meseguer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Minghao Chen; Shiyou Wei; Junyan Hu; Jing Yuan; Fenghua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Guidelines for Developing and Reporting Machine Learning Predictive Models in Biomedical Research: A Multidisciplinary View.

Authors:  Wei Luo; Dinh Phung; Truyen Tran; Sunil Gupta; Santu Rana; Chandan Karmakar; Alistair Shilton; John Yearwood; Nevenka Dimitrova; Tu Bao Ho; Svetha Venkatesh; Michael Berk
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: General Overview.

Authors:  June-Goo Lee; Sanghoon Jun; Young-Won Cho; Hyunna Lee; Guk Bae Kim; Joon Beom Seo; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Is This the Way Forward?

Authors:  Sonji Clarke; Michail Sideris; Elif Iliria Emin; Ece Emin; Apostolos Papalois; Fredric Willmott
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  All Models Are Wrong, but Some Are Useful.

Authors:  Carol Lynn Curchoe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  AI in the treatment of fertility: key considerations.

Authors:  Jason Swain; Matthew Tex VerMilyea; Marcos Meseguer; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Automation in ART: Paving the Way for the Future of Infertility Treatment.

Authors:  Kadrina Abdul Latif Abdullah; Tomiris Atazhanova; Alejandro Chavez-Badiola; Sourima Biswas Shivhare
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Female Reproductive Function Using Ultrasound: A Review.

Authors:  Zhiyi Chen; Ziyao Wang; Meng Du; Zhenyu Liu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Embryo Transfer Outcome of Recurrent Implantation Failure.

Authors:  Lei Shen; Yanran Zhang; Wenfeng Chen; Xinghui Yin
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Machine learning vs. classic statistics for the prediction of IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Zohar Barnett-Itzhaki; Miriam Elbaz; Rachely Butterman; Devora Amar; Moshe Amitay; Catherine Racowsky; Raoul Orvieto; Russ Hauser; Andrea A Baccarelli; Ronit Machtinger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Adaptive adversarial neural networks for the analysis of lossy and domain-shifted datasets of medical images.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Hemanth Kandula; Fenil Doshi; Anjali Devi Sivakumar; Deeksha Kartik; Raghav Gupta; Rohan Pooniwala; John A Branda; Athe M Tsibris; Daniel R Kuritzkes; John C Petrozza; Charles L Bormann; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 25.671

9.  Clinical implementation of algorithm-based embryo selection is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in single vitrified warmed euploid embryo transfers.

Authors:  Jenna Friedenthal; Carlos Hernandez-Nieto; Rose Marie Roth; Richard Slifkin; Dmitry Gounko; Joseph A Lee; Taraneh Nazem; Christine Briton-Jones; Alan Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.357

10.  Deep learning early warning system for embryo culture conditions and embryologist performance in the ART laboratory.

Authors:  Charles L Bormann; Carol Lynn Curchoe; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Manoj K Kanakasabapathy; Raghav Gupta; Rohan Pooniwala; Hemanth Kandula; Irene Souter; Irene Dimitriadis; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.