Literature DB >> 33026558

All Models Are Wrong, but Some Are Useful.

Carol Lynn Curchoe1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 33026558      PMCID： PMC7550613          DOI： 10.1007/s10815-020-01895-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN： 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction.

Authors:  Georg Kunz; Gerhard Leyendecker
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Brian Kaplan; John L Frattarelli; Tim Child; Gary Nakhuda; F Nicholas Shamma; Kaylen Silverberg; Tasha Kalista; Alan H Handyside; Mandy Katz-Jaffe; Dagan Wells; Tony Gordon; Sharyn Stock-Myer; Susan Willman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Omics as a window to view embryo viability.

Authors:  Rebecca L Krisher; William B Schoolcraft; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  The human endometrium as a sensor of embryo quality.

Authors:  Nick S Macklon; Jan J Brosens
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for human reproduction and embryology presented at ASRM and ESHRE 2018.

Authors:  Carol Lynn Curchoe; Charles L Bormann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Controversies in ART: can the IVF laboratory influence preimplantation embryo aneuploidy?

Authors:  Jason E Swain
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  M B Ratna; S Bhattacharya; B Abdulrahim; D J McLernon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Key performance indicators score (KPIs-score) based on clinical and laboratorial parameters can establish benchmarks for internal quality control in an ART program.

Authors:  José G Franco; Claudia G Petersen; Ana L Mauri; Laura D Vagnini; Adriana Renzi; Bruna Petersen; M C Mattila; Vanessa A Comar; Juliana Ricci; Felipe Dieamant; João Batista A Oliveira; Ricardo L R Baruffi
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  The human factor: does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome?

Authors:  F Cirillo; P Patrizio; M Baccini; E Morenghi; C Ronchetti; L Cafaro; E Zannoni; A Baggiani; P E Levi-Setti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.