Literature DB >> 22736327

A method for semi-automatic grading of human blastocyst microscope images.

E Santos Filho1, J A Noble, M Poli, T Griffiths, G Emerson, D Wells.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The precise assessment of embryo viability is an extremely important factor for the optimization of IVF treatments. In order to assess embryo viability, several embryo scoring systems have been developed. However, they rely mostly on a subjective visual analysis of embryo morphological features and thus are subject to inter- and intra-observer variation. In this paper, we propose a method for image segmentation (the dividing of an image into its meaningful constituent regions) and classification of human blastocyst images with the aim of automating embryo grading.
METHODS: The delineation of the boundaries (segmentation) of the zona pellucida, trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) were performed using advanced image analysis techniques (level set, phase congruency and fitting of ellipse methods). The fractal dimension and mean thickness of TE and ICM image texture descriptors (texture spectrum and grey-level run lengths) were calculated to characterize the main morphological features of the blastocyst with the aim of automatic grading using Support Vector Machine classifiers.
RESULTS: The fractal dimension calculated from the delineated TE boundary provided a good indication of cell number (presented a 0.81 Pearson correlation coefficient with the number of cells), a feature closely associated with blastocyst quality. The classifiers showed different accuracy levels for each grade. They presented accuracy ranges from 0.67 to 0.92 for the embryo development classification, 0.67-0.82 for the ICM classification and 0.53-0.92 for the TE classification. The value 0.92 was the highest accuracy achieved in the tests with 73 blastocysts.
CONCLUSIONS: Semi-automatic grading of human blastocysts by a computer is feasible and may offer a more precise comparison of embryos, reducing subjectivity and allowing embryos with apparently identical morphological scores to be distinguished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22736327     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in the IVF laboratory: overview through the application of different types of algorithms for the classification of reproductive data.

Authors:  Eleonora Inácio Fernandez; André Satoshi Ferreira; Matheus Henrique Miquelão Cecílio; Dóris Spinosa Chéles; Rebeca Colauto Milanezi de Souza; Marcelo Fábio Gouveia Nogueira; José Celso Rocha
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A quantitative approach to blastocyst quality evaluation: morphometric analysis and related IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Cristina Lagalla; Marzia Barberi; Giovanna Orlando; Raffaella Sciajno; Maria Antonietta Bonu; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Blastocyst classification systems used in Latin America: is a consensus possible?

Authors:  Tatiana Puga-Torres; Xavier Blum-Rojas; Medardo Blum-Narváez
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for human reproduction and embryology presented at ASRM and ESHRE 2018.

Authors:  Carol Lynn Curchoe; Charles L Bormann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Quantitative and qualitative trophectoderm grading allows for prediction of live birth and gender.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Katja Tritscher; Richard B Mayer; Peter Oppelt; Hans-Christoph Duba; Maria Maurer; Gudrun Schappacher-Tilp; Erwin Petek; Omar Shebl
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Towards the automation of early-stage human embryo development detection.

Authors:  Vidas Raudonis; Agne Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene; Kristina Sutiene; Domas Jonaitis
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Three ways of knowing: the integration of clinical expertise, evidence-based medicine, and artificial intelligence in assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Gerard Letterie
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.357

9.  Automatic blastomere recognition from a single embryo image.

Authors:  Yun Tian; Ya-bo Yin; Fu-qing Duan; Wei-zhou Wang; Wei Wang; Ming-quan Zhou
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 10.  Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?

Authors:  José C Rocha; Felipe Passalia; Felipe D Matos; Marc P Maserati; Mayra F Alves; Tamie G de Almeida; Bruna L Cardoso; Andrea C Basso; Marcelo F G Nogueira
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.