Literature DB >> 30689154

The comparative analysis of non-thrombotic internal jugular vein stenosis and cerebral venous sinus stenosis.

Chaobo Bai1,2,3, Yaoming Xu1,2,3, Da Zhou1,2,3, Jiayue Ding1,2,3, Qi Yang4, Yuchuan Ding3,5, Xunming Ji6,2,3, Ran Meng7,8,9.   

Abstract

Internal jugular vein (IJV) stenosis and cerebral venous sinus (CVS) stenosis belong to cerebral venous outflow insufficiency. This study aimed to analyze the similarities and differences between IJV stenosis and CVS stenosis. Patients with either IJV stenosis or CVS stenosis confirmed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography between October 2017 and July 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The similarities and differences between IJV stenosis and CVS stenosis on the aspects of clinical and imaging features were compared. A total of 82 eligible patients entered into the final analysis. The similarities of the two subsets of cerebral venous outflow insufficiency mainly included headache, head noises or tinnitus, visual disorders, and sleeping disorders, as well as cloud-like white matter hyperintensity in T2WI and FLAIR sequences of MRI. However, there were differences in between, the ratio of patients with higher intracranial pressure (ICP) was common in CVS stenosis (p < 0.001). Namely, higher ratios of papilledema (p = 0.001) and visual damage (p = 0.029), as well as poor Frisen papilledema grade scores were more commonly observed in CVS stenosis (p = 0.004), while abnormal collateral-vessels appeared more frequently in IJV stenosis (100.00%) than CVS stenosis (28.57%). Continuous head noises, tinnitus and cloud-like white matter hyperintensity in MRI are the features of both IJV stenosis and CVS stenosis. Whereas, severe headache, visual damage, papilledema, and intracranial hypertension (IH) were more common in CVS stenosis, and the appearance of collateral-vessels is a key feature of IJV stenosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral venous sinus (CVS) stenosis; Collateral-vessels; Internal jugular vein (IJV) stenosis; Intracranial hypertension (IH)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30689154     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-019-01820-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  22 in total

1.  Dural venous sinus angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fields; Parisa P Javedani; Julie Falardeau; Gary M Nesbit; Aclan Dogan; Erek K Helseth; Kenneth C Liu; Stanley L Barnwell; Bryan D Petersen
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  Diabetes increases the risk of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Wei-Sheng Chung; Cheng-Li Lin; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions.

Authors:  R M Ahmed; M Wilkinson; G D Parker; M J Thurtell; J Macdonald; P J McCluskey; R Allan; V Dunne; M Hanlon; B K Owler; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  MRI findings of elevated intracranial pressure in cerebral venous thrombosis versus idiopathic intracranial hypertension with transverse sinus stenosis.

Authors:  Maysa A Ridha; Amit M Saindane; Beau B Bruce; Bryan D Riggeal; Linda P Kelly; Nancy J Newman; Valerie Biousse
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2013-02-01

Review 5.  High-pressure headaches: idiopathic intracranial hypertension and its mimics.

Authors:  Kuan-Po Peng; Jong-Ling Fuh; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6.

Authors:  M Kosinski; M S Bayliss; J B Bjorner; J E Ware; W H Garber; A Batenhorst; R Cady; C G H Dahlöf; A Dowson; S Tepper
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: clinical and radiologic outcome of 10 consecutive patients.

Authors:  A Donnet; P Metellus; O Levrier; C Mekkaoui; S Fuentes; H Dufour; J Conrath; F Grisoli
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the prevalence and morphology of sinovenous stenosis.

Authors:  R I Farb; I Vanek; J N Scott; D J Mikulis; R A Willinsky; G Tomlinson; K G terBrugge
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Visual and neurological outcomes following endovascular stenting for pseudotumor cerebri associated with transverse sinus stenosis.

Authors:  Martin G Radvany; David Solomon; Satnam Nijjar; Prem S Subramanian; Neil R Miller; Daniele Rigamonti; Ari Blitz; Philippe Gailloud; Abhay Moghekar
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.042

View more
  12 in total

1.  Probable factors affecting clinical outcomes of internal jugular vein stenosis.

Authors:  Chaobo Bai; Zhongao Wang; Jingwei Guan; Kexin Jin; Jingkun Sun; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

2.  Perioperative mannitol intensive use may avoid the early complication of cerebral venous sinus stenting.

Authors:  Chaobo Bai; Jian Chen; Xiaoqin Wu; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

3.  Normobaric Oxygen May Ameliorate Cerebral Venous Outflow Disturbance-Related Neurological Symptoms.

Authors:  Jiayue Ding; Yu Liu; Xiangyu Li; Zhiying Chen; Jingwei Guan; Kexin Jin; Zhongao Wang; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  The antiphospholipid syndrome may induce non-thrombotic internal jugular vein stenosis: two cases report.

Authors:  Si-Ying Song; Gary Rajah; Yu-Chuan Ding; Xun-Ming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Nonthrombotic internal jugular venous stenosis may facilitate cerebral venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wu; Jingyuan Ya; Da Zhou; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 6.  Pathogeneses and Imaging Features of Cerebral White Matter Lesions of Vascular Origins.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wu; Jingyuan Ya; Da Zhou; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.745

7.  Clinical characteristics and neuroimaging findings in eagle syndrome induced internal jugular vein stenosis.

Authors:  Chaobo Bai; Zhongao Wang; Jingwei Guan; Kexin Jin; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

8.  A proposed framework for cerebral venous congestion.

Authors:  Anirudh Arun; Matthew R Amans; Nicholas Higgins; Waleed Brinjikji; Mithun Sattur; Sudhakar R Satti; Peter Nakaji; Mark Luciano; Thierry Agm Huisman; Abhay Moghekar; Vitor M Pereira; Ran Meng; Kyle Fargen; Ferdinand K Hui
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-07-05

9.  Clinical and neuroimaging correlates among cohorts of cerebral arteriostenosis, venostenosis and arterio-venous stenosis.

Authors:  Jiayue Ding; Jingwei Guan; Gary Rajah; David Dornbos; Weili Li; Zhongao Wang; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Transverse Sinus Stenosis in Venous Pulsatile Tinnitus Patients May Lead to Brain Perfusion and White Matter Changes.

Authors:  Xiaoshuai Li; Ning Xu; Xuxu Meng; Chihang Dai; Xiaoyu Qiu; Heyu Ding; Han Lv; Rong Zeng; Jing Xie; Pengfei Zhao; Zhenghan Yang; Shusheng Gong; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.