Anirudh Arun1, Matthew R Amans2, Nicholas Higgins3, Waleed Brinjikji4, Mithun Sattur5, Sudhakar R Satti6, Peter Nakaji7, Mark Luciano8, Thierry Agm Huisman9, Abhay Moghekar10, Vitor M Pereira11, Ran Meng12, Kyle Fargen13, Ferdinand K Hui1. 1. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA. 3. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. 4. Department of Radiology, 6915Mayo Clinic, USA. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, USA. 6. Department of Neurointerventional Surgery, ChristianaCare Christiana Hospital, USA. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center, USA. 8. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA. 9. Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, USA. 10. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA. 11. Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital, Canada. 12. Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, China. 13. Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While venous congestion in the peripheral vasculature has been described and accepted, intracranial venous congestion remains poorly understood. The characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of cerebral venous stasis, venous hypertension and venous congestion remain controversial, and a unifying conceptual schema is absent. The cerebral venous and lymphatic systems are part of a complex and dynamic interaction between the intracranial compartments, with interplay between the parenchyma, veins, arteries, cerebrospinal fluid, and recently characterized lymphatic-like systems in the brain. Each component contributes towards intracranial pressure, occupying space within the fixed calvarial volume. This article proposes a framework to consider conditions resulting in brain and neck venous congestion, and seeks to expedite further study of cerebral venous diagnoses, mechanisms, symptomatology, and treatments. METHODS: A multi-institution retrospective review was performed to identify unique patient cases, complemented with a published case series to assess a spectrum of disease states with components of venous congestion affecting the brain. These diseases were organized according to anatomical location and purported mechanisms. Outcomes of treatments were also analyzed. Illustrative cases were identified in the venous treatment databases of the authors. CONCLUSION: This framework is the first clinically structured description of venous pathologies resulting in intracranial venous and cerebrospinal fluid hypertension. Our proposed system highlights unique clinical symptoms and features critical for appropriate diagnostic work-up and potential treatment. This novel schema allows clinicians effectively to approach cases of intracranial hypertension secondary to venous etiologies, and furthermore provides a framework by which researchers can better understand this developing area of cerebrovascular disease.
BACKGROUND: While venous congestion in the peripheral vasculature has been described and accepted, intracranial venous congestion remains poorly understood. The characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of cerebral venous stasis, venous hypertension and venous congestion remain controversial, and a unifying conceptual schema is absent. The cerebral venous and lymphatic systems are part of a complex and dynamic interaction between the intracranial compartments, with interplay between the parenchyma, veins, arteries, cerebrospinal fluid, and recently characterized lymphatic-like systems in the brain. Each component contributes towards intracranial pressure, occupying space within the fixed calvarial volume. This article proposes a framework to consider conditions resulting in brain and neck venous congestion, and seeks to expedite further study of cerebral venous diagnoses, mechanisms, symptomatology, and treatments. METHODS: A multi-institution retrospective review was performed to identify unique patient cases, complemented with a published case series to assess a spectrum of disease states with components of venous congestion affecting the brain. These diseases were organized according to anatomical location and purported mechanisms. Outcomes of treatments were also analyzed. Illustrative cases were identified in the venous treatment databases of the authors. CONCLUSION: This framework is the first clinically structured description of venous pathologies resulting in intracranial venous and cerebrospinal fluid hypertension. Our proposed system highlights unique clinical symptoms and features critical for appropriate diagnostic work-up and potential treatment. This novel schema allows clinicians effectively to approach cases of intracranial hypertension secondary to venous etiologies, and furthermore provides a framework by which researchers can better understand this developing area of cerebrovascular disease.
Authors: Samuel Bidot; Joshua M Levy; Amit M Saindane; Nelson M Oyesiku; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse Journal: J Neuroophthalmol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Andrew G Lee; Karl Golnik; Randy Kardon; Michael Wall; Eric Eggenberger; Sunita Yedavally Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Rajiv R Iyer; David Solomon; Abhay Moghekar; C Rory Goodwin; C Matthew Stewart; Masaru Ishii; Philippe Gailloud; Gary L Gallia Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 2.104