Literature DB >> 32617292

Perioperative mannitol intensive use may avoid the early complication of cerebral venous sinus stenting.

Chaobo Bai1,2,3, Jian Chen2,3,4, Xiaoqin Wu1,2,3, Yuchuan Ding3,5, Xunming Ji2,3,4, Ran Meng1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cerebral venous sinus (CVS) stenting has been widely applied for correcting CVS stenosis. However, there are still some potential complications. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of perioperative management on avoiding complications of CVS stenting.
METHODS: Patients confirmed as CVS stenosis were enrolled from January 2014 through November 2019. All CVS stenosis were corrected by stenting when the trans-stenotic mean pressure gradient (MPG) was up to or over 8 mmHg. Patients were divided into perioperative management group and control group. Patients in the former group underwent transiently mannitol 250 mL intravenous infusion immediately prior to stenting besides routine ICP control. While patients in control group underwent the same routine treatment as in the perioperative management group. The clinical symptoms, intracranial pressure (ICP), and MPG of the patients were compared before and after stenting. In addition, the complications between the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 81 eligible patients were finally enrolled in this study, including 64 females and 17 males, mean aged 45.35±13.83 years. After stenting, the stenotic CVS restored normal blood flow and MPG decreased significantly [10.0 (8.0-15.0) vs. 0.0 (0.0-0.7) mmHg, P<0.001]. Headache, tinnitus, visual impairment, visual loss, Frisén papilledema grade (FPG), and ICP were ameliorated immediately (P<0.001) in the majority of patients in the two groups. However, the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was higher in control group (11.4% vs. 0.0%, P=0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: A transiently strict preoperative ICP control by mannitol may inhibit CVS stenting-related hemorrhage, which makes the stenting safer and more effective on correcting the CVS stenosis. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral venous sinus stenosis (CVS stenosis); complication; perioperative management; stenting

Year:  2020        PMID: 32617292      PMCID: PMC7327372          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Cerebral venous sinus (CVS) stenosis is closely related to intracranial hypertension (IH). CVS stenosis can induce cerebral venous outflow disorders, which subsequently result in intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation (1-3). Some scholars have proposed the hypothesis that the CVS stenosis and the elevated ICP may be mutually reinforcing (4). CVS stenosis can be manifest as severe headache and persistent tinnitus. In some patients, CVS stenosis represents visual impairment, which may lead to progressive vision loss if not corrected immediately. In recent years, the effectiveness of stenting has been well established in CVS stenosis (5-8). Venous stenting has advantages in the aspects of reducing IH, alleviating clinical symptoms, and preventing or improving visual impairment. Cerebral venous stenting has become a promising treatment option for CVS stenosis. However, the CVS stenting-related complications have not received enough attention. The common complications include postoperative headache, epidural hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage, and restenosis and intra-stent thrombosis. Serious complications such as life-threatening cerebral hemorrhage may lead to a poor clinical outcome (8-10). This study aimed to explore the efficacy of perioperative management on preventing CVS stenting-related complications. We present the following article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3021).

Methods

Study design and patient’s selection

This single center real-world study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. All participants signed the consent forms before enrolment. The study was conducted from January 2014 through November 2019. All medical data from the inpatient database were obtained and analyzed by two experienced neurologists and radiologists. The clinical data such as clinical characteristics, ICP, and mean pressure gradient (MPG) before and after stenting, as well as the complications, were analyzed. Patient inclusion criteria for initial stenting were: (I) patients with CVS stenosis confirmed by contrast-enhanced MR venography (CE-MRV)/CT venography (CTV)/digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were eligible for this study; (II) lumbar puncture opening pressure ≥200 mmH2O; (III) the trans-stenotic MPG ≥8 mmHg; (IV) patients were unresponsive to conservative medical treatment. Exclusion criteria: (I) intracranial central nervous system (CNS) malignancy; (II) patient with incomplete clinical data or lack of the follow-up data.

Treatment procedure

Preoperative preparation

All patients preparing for undergoing stenting procedure received dual antiplatelet daily [75 mg clopidogrel (Sanofi Winthrop Industries, France, the approval number was J20130083) and 100 mg of aspirin (Bayer Healthcare Manufacturing, Italy, the approval number was J20171021)] for 3 to 5 days, besides routine dehydration treatment, such as mannitol (produced by Beijing Huarunshuanghe Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., the approval number was H11020861) 125 mL/q6h/iv. In addition, patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they agreed to undergo the perioperative strict ICP control. Patients in perioperative management group underwent transiently mannitol 250 mL intravenous infusion immediately prior to stenting, whereas, patients in control group did not undergo transiently mannitol 250 mL intravenous infusion except for the same routine treatment as in the perioperative management group.

CVS manometry and stenting

Diagnostic cerebral sinus venography and manometry were performed under local anesthesia. All patients were heparinized prior to CVS manometry. Eligible patients (MPG ≥8 mmHg) were treated with self-expanding Acculink stenting (Cordis, Hialeah, Florida, USA).

Postoperative management

All patients in the two groups underwent low molecular weight heparin (Sanofi Winthrop Industries, France, the approval number was J20150059) subcutaneous injection (0.6 mL, q12h) and conventional dehydration therapy before stenting for 3 days. Blood pressure, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation of the patients were monitored. CT scan of the brain was routinely performed within 24 h post-stenting. If no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage in their CT maps, the patients would continue undergo dual antiplatelet for 12 months. In addition, patients with CVST-induced CVS stenosis would undergo single antiplatelet and single oral anticoagulation agent for 6 months, after which single antiplatelet monotherapy was administered for 1 year. All cases were followed up by outpatient or telephone.

Quantification of clinical characteristics

The severity of papilledema was assessed by Frisén papilledema grade (FPG). ICP was defined as the lumbar puncture open pressure. The trans-stenotic pressure gradient was represented by MPG.

Statistical analysis

We performed all data analysis by the social science statistical software package SPSS version 21.0 program (IBM, USA). The results were expressed as counts and percentages for categorical variables, as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables, and as median (interquartile range) for discrete data. The Fisher’s exact test was applied to evaluate differences in categorical variables, and the Student t-test to evaluate differences in continuous variables. For data that did not meet the normal distribution, Mann-Whitney U test was applied. Two-sided P values <0.05 were defined as statistical significance for all tests.

Results

Baseline demographic data

The baseline demographic data were shown in . In total, 81 patients met the inclusion criteria, the mean age was 45.35±13.83 years, and female vs. male was 64 vs. 17. The mean BMI was 26.53±4.13 kg/m2. The median time from symptoms onset to door was 6 [2-24] months. The average time of follow-up was 23.6 (12.1–42.3) months. Common clinical manifestations of CVS stenosis were visual loss (59.3%), headache (46.9%), visual disorders (40.7%) and tinnitus (32.1%). For lifestyle habits, in which 7.4% reported smoking and 6.2% had alcohol abuse. For the positions of CVS stenosis, transverse sinus (left accounted for 40.7% and right was 44.4%) and transverse sinus-sigmoid sinus boundary (left accounted for 39.5% and right was 51.9%) were the top two vulnerable segments. In addition, superior sagittal sinus (4.9%) and straight sinus (1.2%) were also affected. Finally, 46 patients in the perioperative management group and 35 patients in control group were analyzed and compared.
Table 1

Baseline demographic data

Clinical characteristicsItems
Personal data
   Age45.35±13.83
   Gender (male/female)17/64
   Mean BMI (kg/m2)26.53±4.13
   Time from onset to door, month6 [2–24]
   Mean follow up duration, month23.6 (12.1–42.3)
Clinical manifestations, n (%)
   Headache38 (46.9)
   Tinnitus26 (32.1)
   Visual disorders33 (40.7)
   Visual loss48 (59.3)
Comorbidities, n (%)
   CVST11 (13.6)
   Type 2 diabetes mellitus4 (4.9)
   Hypertension28 (34.6)
   Hyperlipemia10 (12.3)
   Heart disease4 (4.9)
Lifestyle habits, n (%)
   Smoking6 (7.4)
   Alcohol drinking5 (6.2)
Side of CVS stenosis, n (%)
   Left TS33 (40.7)
   Right TS36 (44.4)
   Superior sagittal sinus4 (4.9)
   Straight sinus1 (1.2)
   Left TS-SS boundary32 (39.5)
   Right TS-SS boundary42 (51.9)

BMI, body mass index; CVST, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; TS, transverse sinus; SS, sigmoid sinus.

BMI, body mass index; CVST, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; TS, transverse sinus; SS, sigmoid sinus.

Comparison of clinical data before and after stenting

The clinical characteristics of the patients with CVS stenosis prior and post-stenting were shown in . Symptoms such as headache, visual disorders, visual loss and tinnitus significantly improved after stenting (P<0.001). Although the number of patients with papilledema did not attenuate significantly at a few initial days post-stenting, the FPG of the papilledema at post-stenting was significantly ameliorated than that prior to stenting [pre- vs. post-stenting = 3.0 (3.0–4.0) vs. 1.0 (1.0–1.5), P<0.001]. In addition, significant reduction in ICP was observed (pre- vs. post-stenting = 296.84±64.52 vs. 199.74±56.43 mmH2O, P<0.001). The MPG pre- and post-stenting was measured in situ during catheter angiography. Comparing the MPG pre- and post-stenting, the abnormally elevated MPG decreased immediately and remarkably when the CVS stenosis was corrected by stenting [10.0 (8.0–15.0) vs. 0.0 (0.0–0.7) mmHg, P<0.001].
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of patients with CVS stenosis

ItemsPre-stentingPost-stentingP value
Symptoms, n (%)
   Headache38 (46.9)0<0.001
   Tinnitus26 (32.1)0<0.001
   Visual impairment33 (40.7)3 (3.7)<0.001
   Visual loss33 (40.7)1 (1.2)<0.001
   Papilledema53 (65.4)49 (60.5)0.626
FPG3.0 (3.0–4.0)1.0 (1.0–1.5)<0.001
ICP (mm water column)296.84±64.52199.74±56.43<0.001
MPG (mmHg)10.0 (8.0–15.0)0.0 (0.0–0.7)<0.001

CVS, cerebral venous sinus; FPG, Frisén papilledema grade; ICP, intracranial pressure; MPG, mean pressure gradient.

CVS, cerebral venous sinus; FPG, Frisén papilledema grade; ICP, intracranial pressure; MPG, mean pressure gradient.

Comparison of clinical data between perioperative group and control group

The clinical characteristics of the patients in perioperative management group and control group were displayed in . There were no significant differences in clinical symptoms, FPG, ICP, and MPG between the two groups at baseline. However, the ratio of headache post-stenting in the perioperative management group was much lower than that in control group (2.2% vs. 14.3%, P=0.080). Other items, such as clinical symptoms, FPG, ICP and MPG showed no significant difference between the two groups.
Table 3

Clinical characteristics of perioperative management group and control

ItemsPerioperative management group (n=46)Control group (n=35)P value
Pre-stenting
   Headache, n (%)19 (41.3)19 (54.3)0.269
   Tinnitus, n (%)15 (32.6)11 (31.4)1.000
   Visual impairment, n (%)16 (34.8)17 (48.6)0.257
   Visual loss, n (%)17 (37.0)16 (45.7)0.497
   Papilledema, n (%)34 (73.9)19 (54.3)0.098
   FPG3.0 (3.0–4.5)3.5 (2.6–4.0)0.676
   ICP (mm water column)311.84±64.68277.83±60.110.324
   MPG (mmHg)11.0 (8.0–15.8)8.8 (8.0–10.5)0.183
Post-stenting
   Headache, n (%)1 (2.2)5 (14.3)0.080
   Tinnitus, n (%)00NA
   Visual impairment, n (%)00NA
   Visual loss, n (%)1 (2.2)01.000
   Papilledema, n (%)31 (67.4)18 (51.4)0.173
   FPG0.0 (0.0–0.5)0.0. (0.0–0.0)0.192
   ICP (mm water column)207.14±60.37179.00±41.890.292
   MPG (mmHg)0.0 (0.0–0.7)0.0 (0.0–0.6)0.782
Complications, n (%)
   Intracranial hemorrhage04 (11.4)0.031*
   Stent-adjacent stenosis00NA
   Intraluminal thrombosis00NA
   Intraluminal restenosis00NA

Data are presented as n (%), mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). *, P<0.05. FPG, Frisén papilledema grade; ICP, intracranial pressure; MPG, mean pressure gradient.

Data are presented as n (%), mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). *, P<0.05. FPG, Frisén papilledema grade; ICP, intracranial pressure; MPG, mean pressure gradient. For early complications post-stenting, 4 patients (11.4%) in control group complicated with stenting-related subdural hematoma, all the hematomas located at the contralateral of the stenting side (). Whereas, no subdural hematoma event (0.0%) occurred in perioperative management group, P=0.031. Other complications, such as stent-adjacent stenosis, intraluminal thrombosis, and intraluminal restenosis showed no statistic difference between the two groups.
Figure 1

Image of a mild epidural hemorrhage in a patient after CVS-stenting. The initial CTV revealed stenosis at the border of the left transverse sinus and sigmoid sinus (A, red arrow); however, the patient presented with severe headache 3 h post-stenting, and CT follow-up showed left epidural hemorrhage (B, red arrow); the symptoms gradually eased after aggressive dehydration therapy, and another two followed-up CT maps at day-5 (C, red arrow) and day-8 (D, red arrow) after CVS-stenting revealed complete absorption of the epidural hemorrhage. CVS, cerebral venous sinus; CTV, CT venography.

Figure 2

Images of severe intracranial hemorrhage after stenting in three patients (patient 1: A-D; patient 2: E-H; patient 3: I-L). Their initial MRV and DSA revealed CVS stenosis (A,B,E,F,I,J, red arrow); their symptoms and signs once improved transiently after stenting. However, they showed severe headaches, vomiting and decreased levels of consciousness, which progressed to a coma after stenting. CT scan revealed intracranial hemorrhage and swelling of the brain tissue (C,G,K, red arrow); they all immediately underwent life-saving decompressive craniectomy, and postoperative CT revealed severe intracranial hemorrhage (D,H,L, red arrow). However, our long-term follow-up found that they were still unconscious and rely on life support equipment. MRV, MR venography; DSA, digital subtraction angiography; CVS, cerebral venous sinus.

Image of a mild epidural hemorrhage in a patient after CVS-stenting. The initial CTV revealed stenosis at the border of the left transverse sinus and sigmoid sinus (A, red arrow); however, the patient presented with severe headache 3 h post-stenting, and CT follow-up showed left epidural hemorrhage (B, red arrow); the symptoms gradually eased after aggressive dehydration therapy, and another two followed-up CT maps at day-5 (C, red arrow) and day-8 (D, red arrow) after CVS-stenting revealed complete absorption of the epidural hemorrhage. CVS, cerebral venous sinus; CTV, CT venography. Images of severe intracranial hemorrhage after stenting in three patients (patient 1: A-D; patient 2: E-H; patient 3: I-L). Their initial MRV and DSA revealed CVS stenosis (A,B,E,F,I,J, red arrow); their symptoms and signs once improved transiently after stenting. However, they showed severe headaches, vomiting and decreased levels of consciousness, which progressed to a coma after stenting. CT scan revealed intracranial hemorrhage and swelling of the brain tissue (C,G,K, red arrow); they all immediately underwent life-saving decompressive craniectomy, and postoperative CT revealed severe intracranial hemorrhage (D,H,L, red arrow). However, our long-term follow-up found that they were still unconscious and rely on life support equipment. MRV, MR venography; DSA, digital subtraction angiography; CVS, cerebral venous sinus.

Discussion

CVS stenosis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)

Previous studies found that IIH involved more common in obese women and was poor response to medication treatment (3,4). However, increasing studies in recent years revealed that CVS stenosis might be one of the major etiologies of refractory IIH, and further, it is worth noting that cerebral sinus stenting can significantly reduce ICP and obtain relief of clinical symptoms accordingly (11-13). Therefore, CVS stenosis received increasing attention as a potential cause of IH (7,14).

Clinical and imaging characteristic of CVS stenosis

In our study, IH-related headaches and visual loss were prominent clinical symptoms of CVS stenosis. Notably, the degree of headache varies from case to case. However, chronic, persistent and tolerable headaches may be missed diagnosis (7,15,16). Long-term optic papillary edema caused by IH led to ischemia of the optic disc, and then resulted in visual damage. In addition, pulsatile tinnitus is another common symptom of CVS stenosis. Although the pathological mechanism of pulsatile tinnitus has not been elucidated, its response to stenting surgery is satisfactory (17-19). To date, a variety of methods including MRV, CTV, and DSA have been applied to detect CVS stenosis. In our study, transverse sinus and transverse sinus-sigmoid sinus boundary are the most common affected sites.

Clinical CVS stenting-related hemorrhage

The operating environment is different between CVS stenting and cerebral arterial stenting. The former is performed under IH, while the later was not. When the CVS outflow was opened suddenly by stenting, a transient pressure difference between the side of the stent and the contralateral brain may occur, resulting in midline shift, the contralateral perforating vein is pulled and damaged, as a result, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and cerebral hematoma may increase. Whereby, potential CVS stenting-related early complications involved intracranial hemorrhage and subdural hematoma (14,20). Thus, the intensive ICP control may attenuate the pressure difference between the two sides of the midline immediately after stenting. This may explain the results in this study that the incidence of CVS stenting-related hematoma is lower in the perioperative management group than that in control group. In addition, long-term complications of stenting include intraluminal thrombosis and intraluminal restenosis, the incidences of CVS stenting-related complications differed among previous literatures, ranged from 2% to 10% (14,20). For long-term complications such as stent-adjacent stenosis, intraluminal thrombosis and intraluminal restenosis, uncontrolled intimal proliferation may be the potential cause (20). Previous studies compared the effects of dual antiplatelet and single antiplatelet drugs on long-term complications after CVS stenting, all of which revealed that patients with dual antiplatelet therapy had a lower incidence of restenosis and thrombosis after the stent placement (14,20,21). However, the long-term complications mentioned above did not occur in all of the patients enrolled in this study, which revealed that, both dual antiplatelet or antiplatelet combined with single anticoagulation may be a promising therapy to inhibit long-term complications after CVS stenting.

Importance of strictly preoperative ICP control

In this study, 4 out of 35 patients in control group (11.4%) complicated with subdural hematoma, moreover, all of the hematomas located at the opposite side of the stent. However, no hematoma event occurred in the perioperative management group. The mechanism of the stenting-related contralateral side subdural hematoma was not clarified. A possible explanation for this phenomenon was that patients in the control group did not undergo a transiently strictly preoperative ICP reducing therapy. Therefore, we hypothesized that ICP on the stenting side was suddenly reduced after the stent self-expended, which resulted in a rapid pressure gradient of the ICP between two sides of the midline. The brain tissue on the opposite hemisphere may “drift” towards the stenting side to some degree. Whereby, a tear between the vessels in brain tissue and the dura mater resulted in a subdural hematoma. The same type of intracranial hemorrhage has also appeared on the side contralateral to the stenting in other studies (5,22). Our results suggest that patients with unilateral transverse sinus stenosis and severe IH may benefit from transiently strictly ICP control. However, this hypothesis still needs more evidence to prove.

Limitations and generalizability

This study has several limitations. Firstly, this study is a single-center study, which may limit the number of patients we enrolled. Future multi-center research is urgently needed. Secondly, the mechanism of the impact of perioperative management on stenting is unclear. Our hypothesis needs more evidence and clinical trials to further confirm. Finally, our follow-up duration is not long enough, which may affect our conclusions on clinical outcomes. Our follow-up study is still ongoing. As the operating environment of the intracranial venous stenting is differing from the intracranial artery stenting, and the former is usually in an IH environment. Mannitol intensive use decreases the IH prior to stenting, which can shrink the pressure difference between two sides of the midline after stenting. Thus, a transient strict ICP control during the perioperative period may be reasonable for inhibiting CVS stenting-related hemorrhagic complications.

Conclusions

A transiently strict preoperative ICP control by mannitol may inhibit CVS stenting-related hemorrhage, which makes the stenting safer and more effective on correcting the CVS stenosis. The article’s supplementary files as
  22 in total

1.  Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions.

Authors:  R M Ahmed; M Wilkinson; G D Parker; M J Thurtell; J Macdonald; P J McCluskey; R Allan; V Dunne; M Hanlon; B K Owler; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis predicts IIH without papilledema in patients with migraine.

Authors:  F Bono; D Messina; C Giliberto; D Cristiano; G Broussard; F Fera; F Condino; A Lavano; A Quattrone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Endovascular treatment of debilitating tinnitus secondary to cerebral venous sinus abnormalities: a literature review and technical illustration.

Authors:  I-Hsiao Yang; Vitor M Pereira; Stephanie Lenck; Patrick Nicholson; Emanuele Orru; Jesse M Klostranec; Timo Krings; Anderson Chun On Tsang
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.836

4.  A new index for the assessment of transverse sinus stenosis for diagnosing idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Gustavo Balthazar da Silveira Carvalho; Sandro Luiz de Andrade Matas; Marcos Hideki Idagawa; Luiz Antônio Tobaru Tibana; Renato Sartori de Carvalho; Matheus Luis Souza Silva; Hugo Cogo-Moreira; Andrea Parolin Jackowski; Nitamar Abdala
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S R Satti; L Leishangthem; M I Chaudry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Visual and neurological outcomes following endovascular stenting for pseudotumor cerebri associated with transverse sinus stenosis.

Authors:  Martin G Radvany; David Solomon; Satnam Nijjar; Prem S Subramanian; Neil R Miller; Daniele Rigamonti; Ari Blitz; Philippe Gailloud; Abhay Moghekar
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ross C Puffer; Wessam Mustafa; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Dural sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: factors associated with hemodynamic failure and management with extended stenting.

Authors:  David A Kumpe; Joshua Seinfeld; Xianchen Huang; Quelin Mei; David E Case; Christopher D Roark; Prem S Subramanian; Kimberly E Lind; Victoria S Pelak; Jeffrey L Bennett
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Efficacy of stenting in patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis-related cerebral venous sinus stenosis.

Authors:  Ke Li; Ming Ren; Ran Meng; Yuchuan Ding; Gary B Rajah; Feng Wang; Xunming Ji
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 10.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: 12 cases treated by venous sinus stenting.

Authors:  J N P Higgins; C Cousins; B K Owler; N Sarkies; J D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  1 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy comparison between OACs plus single antiplatelet and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with cerebral venous sinus stenosis poststenting.

Authors:  Chaobo Bai; Zhiying Chen; Xiaoqin Wu; Roxanne Ilagan; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.