Literature DB >> 30689079

Predicting protein-ligand binding modes for CELPP and GC3: workflows and insight.

Xianjin Xu1,2,3,4, Zhiwei Ma1,2,3,4, Rui Duan1,2,3,4, Xiaoqin Zou5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) continues to release valuable benchmarking datasets to promote improvement and development of computational methods for new drug discovery. We have developed several methods for protein-ligand binding mode prediction during the participation in the D3R challenges. In the present study, these methods were integrated, automated, and systematically tested using the large-scale data from Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Pose Prediction (CELPP) and a subset of Grand challenge 3 (GC3). The results show that current molecular docking methods benefit from the increasing number of protein-ligand complex structures deposited in Protein Data Bank. Using an appropriate protein structure for docking significantly improves the success rate of the binding mode prediction. The results of our template-based method and docking method are compared and discussed. Our future direction include the combination of these two methods for binding mode prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug discovery; Molecular docking; Molecular similarity; Protein–ligand interaction; Template-based

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30689079      PMCID: PMC6494980          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-019-00185-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  31 in total

Review 1.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

2.  UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.

Authors:  Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Sam Z Grinter; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-02-01

6.  D3R Grand Challenge 2: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Zied Gaieb; Shuai Liu; Symon Gathiaka; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; Victoria A Feher; W Patrick Walters; Bernd Kuhn; Markus G Rudolph; Stephen K Burley; Michael K Gilson; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Derived from Rigid and Flexible Decoy Structures: Evaluation with the 2013 and 2014 CSAR Benchmarks.

Authors:  Chengfei Yan; Sam Z Grinter; Benjamin Ryan Merideth; Zhiwei Ma; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Docking-based inverse virtual screening: methods, applications, and challenges.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Marshal Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Biophys Rep       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 10.  Challenges, applications, and recent advances of protein-ligand docking in structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Sam Z Grinter; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  Macrocycle modeling in ICM: benchmarking and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Structural Prediction of Peptide-MHC Binding Modes.

Authors:  Marta A S Perez; Michel A Cuendet; Ute F Röhrig; Olivier Michielin; Vincent Zoete
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Dissimilar Ligands Bind in a Similar Fashion: A Guide to Ligand Binding-Mode Prediction with Application to CELPP Studies.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  A PIP2 substitute mediates voltage sensor-pore coupling in KCNQ activation.

Authors:  Yongfeng Liu; Xianjin Xu; Junyuan Gao; Moawiah M Naffaa; Hongwu Liang; Jingyi Shi; Hong Zhan Wang; Nien-Du Yang; Panpan Hou; Wenshan Zhao; Kelli McFarland White; Wenjuan Kong; Alex Dou; Amy Cui; Guohui Zhang; Ira S Cohen; Xiaoqin Zou; Jianmin Cui
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.