Literature DB >> 26389744

Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Derived from Rigid and Flexible Decoy Structures: Evaluation with the 2013 and 2014 CSAR Benchmarks.

Chengfei Yan1, Sam Z Grinter1, Benjamin Ryan Merideth1, Zhiwei Ma1, Xiaoqin Zou1.   

Abstract

In this study, we developed two iterative knowledge-based scoring functions, ITScore_pdbbind(rigid) and ITScore_pdbbind(flex), using rigid decoy structures and flexible decoy structures, respectively, that were generated from the protein-ligand complexes in the refined set of PDBbind 2012. These two scoring functions were evaluated using the 2013 and 2014 CSAR benchmarks. The results were compared with the results of two other scoring functions, the Vina scoring function and ITScore, the scoring function that we previously developed from rigid decoy structures for a smaller set of protein-ligand complexes. A graph-based method was developed to evaluate the root-mean-square deviation between two conformations of the same ligand with different atom names and orders due to different file preparations, and the program is freely available. Our study showed that the two new scoring functions developed from the larger training set yielded significantly improved performance in binding mode predictions. For binding affinity predictions, all four scoring functions showed protein-dependent performance. We suggest the development of protein-family-dependent scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26389744      PMCID: PMC5130226          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  21 in total

Review 1.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

2.  UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.

Authors:  Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-02-01

6.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Automated large-scale file preparation, docking, and scoring: evaluation of ITScore and STScore using the 2012 Community Structure-Activity Resource benchmark.

Authors:  Sam Z Grinter; Chengfei Yan; Sheng-You Huang; Lin Jiang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity.

Authors:  Christine E Tinberg; Sagar D Khare; Jiayi Dou; Lindsey Doyle; Jorgen W Nelson; Alberto Schena; Wojciech Jankowski; Charalampos G Kalodimos; Kai Johnsson; Barry L Stoddard; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series.

Authors:  Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Jeanne A Stuckey; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  13 in total

1.  Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Chengfei Yan; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Lessons learned from participating in D3R 2016 Grand Challenge 2: compounds targeting the farnesoid X receptor.

Authors:  Rui Duan; Xianjin Xu; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Monte Carlo on the manifold and MD refinement for binding pose prediction of protein-ligand complexes: 2017 D3R Grand Challenge.

Authors:  Mikhail Ignatov; Cong Liu; Andrey Alekseenko; Zhuyezi Sun; Dzmitry Padhorny; Sergei Kotelnikov; Andrey Kazennov; Ivan Grebenkin; Yaroslav Kholodov; Istvan Kolosvari; Alberto Perez; Ken Dill; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Nonparametric chemical descriptors for the calculation of ligand-biopolymer affinities with machine-learning scoring functions.

Authors:  Edelmiro Moman; Maria A Grishina; Vladimir A Potemkin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Combined Approach of Patch-Surfer and PL-PatchSurfer for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction in CSAR 2013 and 2014.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhu; Woong-Hee Shin; Hyungrae Kim; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson; Richard D Smith; Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Jeanne A Stuckey; Aqeel Ahmed; Maire A Convery; Donald O Somers; Michael Kranz; Patricia A Elkins; Guanglei Cui; Catherine E Peishoff; Millard H Lambert; James B Dunbar
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Predicting protein-ligand binding modes for CELPP and GC3: workflows and insight.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Zhiwei Ma; Rui Duan; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Protein-ligand docking using FFT based sampling: D3R case study.

Authors:  Dzmitry Padhorny; David R Hall; Hanieh Mirzaei; Artem B Mamonov; Mohammad Moghadasi; Andrey Alekseenko; Dmitri Beglov; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Rapid Identification of Inhibitors and Prediction of Ligand Selectivity for Multiple Proteins: Application to Protein Kinases.

Authors:  Zhiwei Ma; Sheng-You Huang; Fei Cheng; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.