| Literature DB >> 30687303 |
Irene Bianconi1, Beatriz Alcalá-Franco1, Maria Scarselli2, Mattia Dalsass2,3, Scilla Buccato2, Annalisa Colaprico2, Sara Marchi2, Vega Masignani2, Alessandra Bragonzi1.
Abstract
High incidence, severity and increasing antibiotic resistance characterize Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, highlighting the need for new therapeutic options. Vaccination strategies to prevent or limit P. aeruginosa infections represent a rational approach to positively impact the clinical outcome of risk patients; nevertheless this bacterium remains a challenging vaccine target. To identify novel vaccine candidates, we started from the genome sequence analysis of the P. aeruginosa reference strain PAO1 exploring the reverse vaccinology approach integrated with additional bioinformatic tools. The bioinformatic approaches resulted in the selection of 52 potential antigens. These vaccine candidates were conserved in P. aeruginosa genomes from different origin and among strains isolated longitudinally from cystic fibrosis patients. To assess the immune-protection of single or antigens combination against P. aeruginosa infection, a vaccination protocol was established in murine model of acute respiratory infection. Combinations of selected candidates, rather than single antigens, effectively controlled P. aeruginosa infection in the in vivo model of murine pneumonia. Five combinations were capable of significantly increase survival rate among challenged mice and all included PA5340, a hypothetical protein exclusively present in P. aeruginosa. PA5340 combined with PA3526-MotY gave the maximum protection. Both proteins were surface exposed by immunofluorescence and triggered a specific immune response. Combination of these two protein antigens could represent a potential vaccine to prevent P. aeruginosa infection.Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; mouse model; respiratory infection; reverse vaccinology; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30687303 PMCID: PMC6334337 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Schematic workflow of antigen selection in silico. The complete PAO1 proteome has been analyzed as described in the text. Distribution of ORFs according to predicted sub-cellular localization using Psort is summarized at the top. Below, selection steps succession is reported, indicating the number of candidates (hits) selected after each step. C: cytoplasm; IN: inner membrane; P: periplasm; OM: outer membrane.
Top line vaccine candidates of P. aeruginosa.
| PA0328 | arginine-specific autotransporter AaaA | Yes | Yes | 99.3% ± 0.2% | 99.2% ± 0.3% |
| PA1178 | outer membrane protein OprH precursor | Yes | Yes | 100% ± 0% | 99.9% ± 0.2% |
| PA1248 | outer membrane protein AprF precursor | Yes | Yes | 99.6%± 0.3% | 99.2%± 4.6% |
| PA2407 | putative adhesion protein FpvC | Yes | Yes | 100% ± 0% | 98.3% ± 10.4% |
| PA3526 | outer membrane protein precursor MotY | Yes | Yes | 99.1% ± 0.8% | 99.7% ± 0.5% |
| PA4082 | adhesive protein CupB5 | Yes | Yes | 98.8% ± 0.5% | 98.5% ± 2.9% |
| PA4765 | outer membrane lipoprotein OmlA precursor | Yes | Yes | 99.7% ± 0.3% | 98.9% ± 7.2% |
| PA5047 | putative Zn-dependent protease | Yes | Yes | 99.9% ± 0.1% | 99.2% ± 7.1% |
| PA5112 | esterase EstA | No | Yes | 99.8% ± 0.2% | 99.1% ± 7.2% |
| PA5340 | hypothetical protein | Yes | Yes | 98.8% ± 0.3% | 99.2% ± 0.3% |
Surface exposure suggested by immunofluorescence microscopy co-localization (see text).
Evaluated by Western Blot against recombinant proteins, P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 and clinical isolate MDR-RP73 (see text). Sequence conservation expressed as mean percentage of amino acid identity ± standard deviation calculated among a collection of CF clinical strains
and on the public collection of 104 completed P. aeruginosa genomes available in GenBank (see text).
Figure 2Survival curves of groups of mice immunized with single antigens selected as vaccine candidates. C57Bl/6 male mice were challenged with PAO1 (5*106 cfu) 2 weeks after last vaccination with ten single antigens. Comparisons were performed with mice immunized with Alum alone (negative control) and PAO1 heat-inactivated (h.i.) groups (positive control). An additional group was vaccinated with OprF-OprI, tested as clinical vaccine candidate. Data were pooled from at least two/three independent experiments (n = 16–40). Results are represented as Kaplan–Meier survival curves and analyzed by the Mantel-Cox test against negative control group. N refers to the number of animals.
Figure 3Survival curves of groups of mice immunized with combined antigens selected as vaccine candidates. C57Bl/6 male mice were challenged with PAO1 (5*106 cfu) 2 weeks after last vaccination with combined antigens. Comparisons were performed with mice immunized with Alum alone (negative control) and PAO1 heat inactivated (h.i.) groups (positive control). An additional group was vaccinated with OprF-OprI, tested as clinical vaccine candidate. Data were pooled from at least two/three independent experiments (n = 17–33). Results are represented as Kaplan–Meier survival curves and analyzed by the Mantel-Cox test against negative control group: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. N refers to the number of animals.
Figure 4Cellular localization of vaccine candidates PA5340 and PA3526-MotY and controls by immunofluorescence microscopy. Immunofluorescence staining with confocal microscopy shows the localization of antigens (green) (A–E) and the PAO1 cell wall (red) (F–J). For antigens localization the antisera of naïve mice (A) or immunized with PA3526-MotY (B), PA5340 (C), OprF-OprI (D) or heat inactivated PAO1 (E) were used. Merged images show the co-localization of the two signals (yellow) (K–O) suggesting that proteins could be surface exposed. Detailed co-localization of antigens of interest is shown in the magnification (L, M, N).