Literature DB >> 9393335

Randomised controlled trial of two-component, three-component, and five-component acellular pertussis vaccines compared with whole-cell pertussis vaccine. Ad Hoc Group for the Study of Pertussis Vaccines.

P Olin1, F Rasmussen, L Gustafsson, H O Hallander, H Heijbel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trials in Italy and Sweden showed high efficacy for three-component and five-component pertussis vaccines, and poor efficacy for a whole-cell vaccine licensed in the USA and a two-component vaccine. We compared the efficacy of three acellular vaccines with a UK whole-cell vaccine.
METHODS: We enrolled 82,892 babies aged 2-3 months. Babies were vaccinated at age 3 months, 5 months, and 12 months, or age 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. They were randomly assigned a two-component acellular diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine (n = 20,697), a three-component acellular DTP vaccine (n = 20,728), a five-component acellular DTP vaccine (n = 20,747), or a UK whole-cell DTP vaccine (n = 20,720). We collected data for all reported cases of culture-confirmed pertussis during 3 years of follow-up. The treatment status of the two-component-vaccine group had to be made known midway through the trial for boosting because of poor efficacy. We included data for the two-component vaccine in the analysis of safety and immunogenicity, and data up its unmasking in secondary analyses of relative efficacy. Analyses were by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: During follow-up from the third dose (mean 22 months), in the 3 months, 5 months, 12 months schedule, there were 15 cases of culture-confirmed pertussis with at least 21 days of paroxysmal cough in the whole-cell group, relative risk 1.00, compared with 13 in the five-component group (0.85 [95% CI 0.41-1.79]), and 21 in the three-component group (1.38 [0.71-2.69]). For culture-confirmed pertussis, with or without cough, there were 19 cases in the whole-cell group (1.00). 27 in the five-component group (1.40 [0.78-2.52]), and 49 in the three-component group (2.55 [1.50-4.33]). In the intention-to-treat analyses, from the first dose in the 3 months, 5 months, 12 months schedule the whole-cell vaccine was significantly more protective than the three-component vaccine against typical pertussis. Between the second and the third doses, culture-confirmed pertussis with any cough and with at least 21 days of paroxysmal cough was significantly more frequent in the two-component group than in the three-component group, and in the three-component group than in the five-component and the whole-cell groups, respectively. The serological response of the acellular vaccines in the 2 months, 4 months, 6 months schedule were similar to those previously reported. The whole-cell vaccine was highly immunogenic for fimbriae, pertactin, and filamentous haemagglutinin, but had a low antipertussis toxin response. Hypotonic hyporesponsiveness occurred significantly more frequently in the whole-cell group (p < 0.05) and was more frequent in the acellular groups than previously reported. High fever and seizures occurred more frequently after whole-cell vaccine than after any of the acellular vaccines (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATIONS: The efficacy of the UK whole-cell vaccine and the five-component and three-component vaccines was similar against culture-confirmed pertussis with at least 21 days of paroxysmal cough. The lower efficacy of the three-component vaccine against mild disease suggests that fimbriae have a role in protection against infection. The efficacy of acellular vaccines depends on the number of components, and different whole-cell vaccines have variable efficacies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9393335     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)06508-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  87 in total

Review 1.  Concerns about immunisation.

Authors:  H Bedford; D Elliman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-22

2.  Economic evaluation of a new acellular vaccine for pertussis in Canada.

Authors:  M Iskedjian; T R Einarson; B J O'Brien; J G De Serres; R Gold; I M Gemmill; N Milkovich; A Rosner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Long-term pertussis-specific immunity after primary vaccination with a combined diphtheria, tetanus, tricomponent acellular pertussis, and hepatitis B vaccine in comparison with that after natural infection.

Authors:  S Esposito; T Agliardi; A Giammanco; G Faldella; A Cascio; S Bosis; O Friscia; M Clerici; N Principi
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  British Thoracic Society Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Childhood.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Pertussis is increasing in unimmunized infants: is a change in policy needed?

Authors:  S Ranganathan; R Tasker; R Booy; P Habibi; S Nadel; J Britto
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Surveillance of whooping cough should continue.

Authors:  Ruth C Matthews; Noel W Preston; Debbie J Holden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-19

Review 7.  Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine adsorbed (Triacelluvax; DTaP3-CB): a review of its use in the prevention of Bordetella pertussis infection.

Authors:  A J Matheson; K L Goa
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Booster immunization of children with an acellular pertussis vaccine enhances Th2 cytokine production and serum IgE responses against pertussis toxin but not against common allergens.

Authors:  E J Ryan; L Nilsson; N Kjellman; L Gothefors; K H Mills
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Pertussis vaccine controversies and acellular pertussis vaccine.

Authors:  Raju C Shah; Anuj R Shah
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  The distribution over time of costs and social net benefits for pertussis immunization programs.

Authors:  Dorota Zdanowska Girard
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.