Literature DB >> 12563129

Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography.

Marius R Schmid1, Hubert P Nötzli, Marco Zanetti, Tobias F Wyss, Juerg Hodler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the detection of articular cartilage lesions in patients suspected of having femoroacetabular impingement and/or labral abnormalities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two MR arthrograms obtained in 40 patients with a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement and/or labral defect were retrospectively analyzed. Two readers independently interpreted the images for cartilage lesion location, depiction, and characteristics. Within 6 months after MR arthrography, each patient underwent open hip surgery, during which the entire cartilage of the hip joint was inspected. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. kappa values were calculated to quantify the level of interobserver agreement.
RESULTS: At surgery, most (37 [88%] of 42) cartilage defects were identified in the anterosuperior part of the acetabulum. In 23 (55%), 12 (29%), 10 (24%), and 10 (24%) hips, lesions were found in the posterosuperior acetabulum, anteroinferior acetabulum, posteroinferior acetabulum, and femoral head, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities of MR arthrographic detection of cartilage damage in all regions combined were 79% (73 of 92 regions) and 77% (91 of 118 regions), respectively, for reader 1 and 50% (46 of 92 regions) and 84% (99 of 118 regions), respectively, for reader 2. At interobserver comparison, agreement was fair (kappa = 0.31) for detection of cartilage lesions in the femoral head and poor (kappa <or= 0.2) for detection of lesions in all acetabular regions.
CONCLUSION: Cartilage lesions are common in young and middle-aged patients with femoroacetabular impingement and/or labral abnormalities and are most frequently found in the anterosuperior part of the acetabulum. 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12563129     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2262020019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  71 in total

Review 1.  Direct magnetic resonance arthrography.

Authors:  Dmitry Elentuck; William E Palmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Gemma Hilton; Andoni P Toms; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of pre-operative dGEMRIC imaging with intra-operative findings in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Bernd Bittersohl; Harish S Hosalkar; Sebastian Apprich; Stefan A Werlen; Klaus A Siebenrock; Tallal Charles Mamisch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  MRI of hip cartilage: joint morphology, structure, and composition.

Authors:  Stephanie L Gold; Alissa J Burge; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Arthroscopic identification of iliopubic and ilioischial grooves in a single adult acetabulum.

Authors:  C P Paliobeis; R N Villar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-09-09

6.  Surgical technique: Second-generation bone marrow stimulation via surgical dislocation to treat hip cartilage lesions.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Lisa M Tibor; Florian D Naal; Reinhold Ganz; Matthias R Steinwachs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Hip pain in adults: MR imaging appearance of common causes.

Authors:  Bernard Mengiardi; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  [Magnetic resonance tomography and arthrography of the hip joint].

Authors:  G Schneider; A Massmann; P Fries; M Kusma; M Dienst
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  [Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedic medicine].

Authors:  R Straub; M G Mack; V Jacobi; D Proschek; T J Vogl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  3D double-echo steady-state sequence assessment of hip joint cartilage and labrum at 3 Tesla: comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative data.

Authors:  Christoph Schleich; Tobias Hesper; Harish S Hosalkar; Fanni Rettegi; Christoph Zilkens; Rüdiger Krauspe; Gerald Antoch; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.