Literature DB >> 28189195

The diagnostic performance of non-contrast 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) versus 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance arthrography (1.5-T MRA) in femoro-acetabular impingement.

Ana M Crespo-Rodríguez1, Jose C De Lucas-Villarrubia2, Miguel Pastrana-Ledesma3, Ana Hualde-Juvera4, Santiago Méndez-Alonso5, Mario Padron6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3-T non-contrast MRI versus 1.5-T MRA for assessing labrum and articular cartilage lesions in patients with clinical suspicion of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (thirty men and twenty women, mean age 42.5 years) underwent 1.5-T MRA, 3-T MRI and arthroscopy on the same hip. An optimized high-resolution proton density spin echo pulse sequence was included in the 3-T non-contrast MRI protocol.
RESULTS: The 3-T non-contrast MRI identified forty-two of the forty-three arthroscopically proven tears at the labral-chondral transitional zone (sensitivity, 97.7%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value (PPV), 100%; negative predictive value (NPV), 87.5%; accuracy 98%). With 1.5-T MRA, forty-four tears were diagnosed. However, there was one false positive (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 85.7%; PPV, 97.7%; NPV, 100%; accuracy 98%). Agreement between arthroscopy and MRI, whether 3-T non-contrast MRI or 1.5-T MRA, as to the degree of chondral lesion in the acetabulum was reached in half of the patients and in the femur in 76% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Non-invasive assessment of the hip is possible with 3-T MR magnet. 3-T non-contrast MRI could replace MRA as the workhorse technique for assessing hip internal damage. MRA would then be reserved for young adults with a strong clinical suspicion of FAI but normal findings on 3-T non-contrast MRI. When compared with 1.5-T MRA, optimized sequences with 3-T non-contrast MRI help in detecting normal variants and in diagnosing articular cartilage lesions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrography; Femoro-acetabular impingement; Hip; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Sensitivitity; Specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28189195     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

1.  The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 3: imaging techniques.

Authors:  Miguel O Castro; Vasco V Mascarenhas; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Florian Schmaranzer; Reto Sutter; Ara Kassarjian; Luca Sconfienza; Michael Dienst; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Poor Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography to Detect Hip Chondral Delamination: A Retrospective Follow-Up of 227 FAI-Operated Patients.

Authors:  George Konstantinidis; Michael Mitchell; Gordon Boyd; Catherine Coady; Swagata Ghosh; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Value of response to anesthetic injection during hip MR arthrography to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology.

Authors:  Arvin B Kheterpal; Katherine M Bunnell; Jad S Husseini; Connie Y Chang; Scott D Martin; Adam C Zoga; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  [Update on imaging in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome].

Authors:  Clemens Felsing; Jörg Schröder
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram Improves Visualization of Hip Capsular Defects in Patients Undergoing Previous Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Kelly M Tomasevich; Megan K Mills; Hailey Allen; Amanda M Crawford; Alexander J Mortensen; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  3.0 T MRI is more recommended to detect acetabular labral tears than MR Arthrography: an updated meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Chunbao Li; Wenliang Wang; Baiqing Zhang; Weicheng Miao; Yujie Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  The Short-term Outcomes of Physiotherapy for Patients with Acetabular Labral Tears: An Analysis according to Severity of Injury in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Makoto Kawai; Kenji Tateda; Yuma Ikeda; Ima Kosukegawa; Satoshi Nagoya; Masaki Katayose
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2022-03-07

8.  [Need for and predictability of magnetic resonance imaging examinations in patients with implanted neurostimulators].

Authors:  Marco Reining; Dirk Winkler; Joachim Böttcher; Jürgen Meixensberger; Michael Kretzschmar
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 1.629

9.  Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Arvin B Kheterpal; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.959

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.