Literature DB >> 30649735

Overview of the First Natural Language Processing Challenge for Extracting Medication, Indication, and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Record Notes (MADE 1.0).

Abhyuday Jagannatha1, Feifan Liu2, Weisong Liu3,4, Hong Yu5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This work describes the Medication and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Records (MADE 1.0) corpus and provides an overview of the MADE 1.0 2018 challenge for extracting medication, indication, and adverse drug events (ADEs) from electronic health record (EHR) notes.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of MADE is to provide a set of common evaluation tasks to assess the state of the art for natural language processing (NLP) systems applied to EHRs supporting drug safety surveillance and pharmacovigilance. We also provide benchmarks on the MADE dataset using the system submissions received in the MADE 2018 challenge.
METHODS: The MADE 1.0 challenge has released an expert-annotated cohort of medication and ADE information comprising 1089 fully de-identified longitudinal EHR notes from 21 randomly selected patients with cancer at the University of Massachusetts Memorial Hospital. Using this cohort as a benchmark, the MADE 1.0 challenge designed three shared NLP tasks. The named entity recognition (NER) task identifies medications and their attributes (dosage, route, duration, and frequency), indications, ADEs, and severity. The relation identification (RI) task identifies relations between the named entities: medication-indication, medication-ADE, and attribute relations. The third shared task (NER-RI) evaluates NLP models that perform the NER and RI tasks jointly. In total, 11 teams from four countries participated in at least one of the three shared tasks, and 41 system submissions were received in total.
RESULTS: The best systems F1 scores for NER, RI, and NER-RI were 0.82, 0.86, and 0.61, respectively. Ensemble classifiers using the team submissions improved the performance further, with an F1 score of 0.85, 0.87, and 0.66 for the three tasks, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MADE results show that recent progress in NLP has led to remarkable improvements in NER and RI tasks for the clinical domain. However, some room for improvement remains, particularly in the NER-RI task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30649735      PMCID: PMC6860017          DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0762-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  54 in total

1.  Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM.

Authors:  F A Gers; J Schmidhuber; F Cummins
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles.

Authors:  C Friedman; P Kra; H Yu; M Krauthammer; A Rzhetsky
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Identifying adverse drug event information in clinical notes with distributional semantic representations of context.

Authors:  Aron Henriksson; Maria Kvist; Hercules Dalianis; Martin Duneld
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital.

Authors:  Jonathan R Nebeker; Jennifer M Hoffman; Charlene R Weir; Charles L Bennett; John F Hurdle
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-05-23

5.  ADESSA: A Real-Time Decision Support Service for Delivery of Semantically Coded Adverse Drug Event Data.

Authors:  Jon D Duke; Jeff Friedlin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  The Unified Medical Language System: an informatics research collaboration.

Authors:  B L Humphreys; D A Lindberg; H M Schoolman; G O Barnett
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Leslie R Harrold; Jeffrey Rothschild; Kristin Debellis; Andrew C Seger; Cynthia Cadoret; Leslie S Fish; Lawrence Garber; Michael Kelleher; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Adverse drug event reporting. Improving the low US reporting rates.

Authors:  S A Edlavitch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-07

9.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Phenotyping for patient safety: algorithm development for electronic health record based automated adverse event and medical error detection in neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  Qi Li; Kristin Melton; Todd Lingren; Eric S Kirkendall; Eric Hall; Haijun Zhai; Yizhao Ni; Megan Kaiser; Laura Stoutenborough; Imre Solti
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  29 in total

1.  Timely and Efficient AI Insights on EHR: System Design.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Suryanarayanan; Edward A Epstein; Abhishek Malvankar; Burn L Lewis; Lou DeGenaro; Jennifer J Liang; Ching-Huei Tsou; Divya Pathak
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

2.  A study of deep learning approaches for medication and adverse drug event extraction from clinical text.

Authors:  Qiang Wei; Zongcheng Ji; Zhiheng Li; Jingcheng Du; Jingqi Wang; Jun Xu; Yang Xiang; Firat Tiryaki; Stephen Wu; Yaoyun Zhang; Cui Tao; Hua Xu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Comparative assessment of manual chart review and ICD claims data in evaluating immunotherapy-related adverse events.

Authors:  Andrew Nashed; Shijun Zhang; Chien-Wei Chiang; M Zitu; Gregory A Otterson; Carolyn J Presley; Kari Kendra; Sandip H Patel; Andrew Johns; Mingjia Li; Madison Grogan; Gabrielle Lopez; Dwight H Owen; Lang Li
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Towards Drug Safety Surveillance and Pharmacovigilance: Current Progress in Detecting Medication and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Feifan Liu; Abhyuday Jagannatha; Hong Yu
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Deep learning approaches for extracting adverse events and indications of dietary supplements from clinical text.

Authors:  Yadan Fan; Sicheng Zhou; Yifan Li; Rui Zhang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction in electronic health records.

Authors:  Sam Henry; Kevin Buchan; Michele Filannino; Amber Stubbs; Ozlem Uzuner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Adverse Drug Reaction Case Safety Practices in Large Biopharmaceutical Organizations from 2007 to 2017: An Industry Survey.

Authors:  Stella Stergiopoulos; Mortiz Fehrle; Patrick Caubel; Louise Tan; Louise Jebson
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  Relation Classification for Bleeding Events From Electronic Health Records Using Deep Learning Systems: An Empirical Study.

Authors:  Avijit Mitra; Bhanu Pratap Singh Rawat; David D McManus; Hong Yu
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-07-02

9.  An investigation of single-domain and multidomain medication and adverse drug event relation extraction from electronic health record notes using advanced deep learning models.

Authors:  Fei Li; Hong Yu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  Can antiepileptic efficacy and epilepsy variables be studied from electronic health records? A review of current approaches.

Authors:  Barbara M Decker; Chloé E Hill; Steven N Baldassano; Pouya Khankhanian
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.