Literature DB >> 15911723

High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital.

Jonathan R Nebeker1, Jennifer M Hoffman, Charlene R Weir, Charles L Bennett, John F Hurdle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that specific computerized interventions may reduce medication errors, but few have examined adverse drug events (ADEs) across all stages of the computerized medication process. We describe the frequency and type of inpatient ADEs that occurred following the adoption of multiple computerized medication ordering and administration systems, including computerized physician order entry (CPOE).
METHODS: Using explicit standardized criteria, pharmacists classified inpatient ADEs from prospective daily reviews of electronic medical records from a random sample of all admissions during a 20-week period at a Veterans Administration hospital. We analyzed ADEs that necessitated a changed treatment plan.
RESULTS: Among 937 hospital admissions, 483 clinically significant inpatient ADEs were identified, accounting for 52 ADEs per 100 admissions and an incidence density of 70 ADEs per 1000 patient-days. One quarter of the hospitalizations had at least 1 ADE. Of all ADEs, 9% resulted in serious harm, 22% in additional monitoring and interventions, 32% in interventions alone, and 11% in monitoring alone; 27% should have resulted in additional interventions or monitoring. Medication errors contributed to 27% of these ADEs. Errors associated with ADEs occurred in the following stages: 61% ordering, 25% monitoring, 13% administration, 1% dispensing, and 0% transcription. The medical record reflected recognition of 76% of the ADEs.
CONCLUSIONS: High rates of ADEs may continue to occur after implementation of CPOE and related computerized medication systems that lack decision support for drug selection, dosing, and monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911723     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.10.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  94 in total

1.  Pharmacists' interventions in prescribing errors at hospital discharge: an observational study in the context of an electronic prescribing system in a UK teaching hospital.

Authors:  Derar H Abdel-Qader; Lindsay Harper; Judith A Cantrill; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  From simply inaccurate to complex and inaccurate: complexity in standards-based quality measures.

Authors:  David A Dorr; Aaron M Cohen; Marsha Pierre-Jacques Williams; John Hurdle
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

3.  Prescribers' expectations and barriers to electronic prescribing of controlled substances.

Authors:  Cindy Parks Thomas; Meelee Kim; Ann McDonald; Peter Kreiner; Stephen J Kelleher; Michael B Blackman; Peter N Kaufman; Grant M Carrow
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Preventable and non-preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a prospective chart review in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Aileen B Dequito; Peter G M Mol; Jasperien E van Doormaal; Rianne J Zaal; Patricia M L A van den Bemt; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Jos G W Kosterink
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Clinical decision support: progress and opportunities.

Authors:  Jason A Lyman; Wendy F Cohn; Meryl Bloomrosen; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Benchmarking electronic medical records initiatives in the US: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Carlos Palacio; Jeffrey P Harrison; David Garets
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Craig Kuziemsky; Morgan Price; Jesse Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  An unintended consequence of electronic prescriptions: prevalence and impact of internal discrepancies.

Authors:  Matvey B Palchuk; Elizabeth A Fang; Janet M Cygielnik; Matthew Labreche; Maria Shubina; Harley Z Ramelson; Claus Hamann; Carol Broverman; Jonathan S Einbinder; Alexander Turchin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Value of human factors to medication and patient safety in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Matthew C Scanlon; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  Overview of the First Natural Language Processing Challenge for Extracting Medication, Indication, and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Record Notes (MADE 1.0).

Authors:  Abhyuday Jagannatha; Feifan Liu; Weisong Liu; Hong Yu
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.