Literature DB >> 30649175

Cardiovascular Risk Factors Associated With Venous Thromboembolism.

John Gregson1, Stephen Kaptoge2,3, Thomas Bolton2,3, Lisa Pennells2, Peter Willeit2,4, Stephen Burgess2,5, Steven Bell2,3, Michael Sweeting2, Eric B Rimm6, Christopher Kabrhel7, Bengt Zöller8, Gerd Assmann9, Vilmundur Gudnason10, Aaron R Folsom11, Volker Arndt12, Astrid Fletcher1, Paul E Norman13, Børge G Nordestgaard14,15,16, Akihiko Kitamura17, Bakhtawar K Mahmoodi18, Peter H Whincup19, Matthew Knuiman13, Veikko Salomaa20, Christa Meisinger21,22, Wolfgang Koenig23,24,25, Maryam Kavousi26, Henry Völzke27, Jackie A Cooper28, Toshiharu Ninomiya29, Edoardo Casiglia30, Beatriz Rodriguez31, Yoav Ben-Shlomo32, Jean-Pierre Després33, Leon Simons34, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor35, Cecilia Björkelund36, Marlene Notdurfter37, Daan Kromhout18, Jackie Price38, Susan E Sutherland39, Johan Sundström27, Jussi Kauhanen40, John Gallacher32, Joline W J Beulens41,42, Rachel Dankner43, Cyrus Cooper44, Simona Giampaoli45, Jason F Deen46, Agustín Gómez de la Cámara47, Lewis H Kuller48, Annika Rosengren36, Peter J Svensson8, Dorothea Nagel21, Carlos J Crespo49, Hermann Brenner11, Juan R Albertorio-Diaz50, Robert Atkins51, Eric J Brunner52, Martin Shipley52, Inger Njølstad53, Deborah A Lawlor32,54, Yvonne T van der Schouw42, Randi Marie Selmer53, Maurizio Trevisan55, W M Monique Verschuren42,56, Philip Greenland57, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller58, Gordon D O Lowe59, Angela M Wood2, Adam S Butterworth2,3, Simon G Thompson2, John Danesh2,3, Emanuele Di Angelantonio2,3, Tom Meade1.   

Abstract

Importance: It is uncertain to what extent established cardiovascular risk factors are associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objective: To estimate the associations of major cardiovascular risk factors with VTE, ie, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study included individual participant data mostly from essentially population-based cohort studies from the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC; 731 728 participants; 75 cohorts; years of baseline surveys, February 1960 to June 2008; latest date of follow-up, December 2015) and the UK Biobank (421 537 participants; years of baseline surveys, March 2006 to September 2010; latest date of follow-up, February 2016). Participants without cardiovascular disease at baseline were included. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to September 2018. Exposures: A panel of several established cardiovascular risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) per 1-SD higher usual risk factor levels (or presence/absence). Incident fatal outcomes in ERFC (VTE, 1041; coronary heart disease [CHD], 25 131) and incident fatal/nonfatal outcomes in UK Biobank (VTE, 2321; CHD, 3385). Hazard ratios were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, and body mass index (BMI).
Results: Of the 731 728 participants from the ERFC, 403 396 (55.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age at the time of the survey was 51.9 (9.0) years; of the 421 537 participants from the UK Biobank, 233 699 (55.4%) were female, and the mean (SD) age at the time of the survey was 56.4 (8.1) years. Risk factors for VTE included older age (ERFC: HR per decade, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.45-2.91; UK Biobank: HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.71-1.92), current smoking (ERFC: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20-1.58; UK Biobank: HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.40), and BMI (ERFC: HR per 1-SD higher BMI, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35-1.50; UK Biobank: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.32-1.41). For these factors, there were similar HRs for pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in UK Biobank (except adiposity was more strongly associated with pulmonary embolism) and similar HRs for unprovoked vs provoked VTE. Apart from adiposity, these risk factors were less strongly associated with VTE than CHD. There were inconsistent associations of VTEs with diabetes and blood pressure across ERFC and UK Biobank, and there was limited ability to study lipid and inflammation markers. Conclusions and Relevance: Older age, smoking, and adiposity were consistently associated with higher VTE risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30649175      PMCID: PMC6386140          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), consisting of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major clinical burden. Globally, there are about 10 million cases every year, and it is the third leading vascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke.[1] Pulmonary embolism is a manifestation of VTE and is responsible for most VTE deaths.[2] In recent years, efforts to prevent VTE have broadened from focusing mainly on hospital-based risk factors (eg, recent prior surgery, cancer, and congestive heart failure) toward adoption of heart-healthy lifestyles.[3] This perspective has challenged traditional views of venous and arterial thrombosis as distinct pathologies, encouraging prevention strategies that concomitantly address VTE and arterial thrombosis.[2,4] However, there is uncertainty about the extent to which venous and arterial thrombosis share cardiovascular risk factors, as studies have reported conflicting findings.[5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] Interpretation has been complicated by the use of retrospective case-control designs, limited statistical power, and/or inability to compare VTE and arterial disease outcomes within the same cohorts.[16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] Analyzing data from more than 1.1 million participants in 76 prospective studies, we investigated associations of several established cardiovascular risk factors with the incidence of VTE outcomes. We aimed to address 2 principal questions: What are the associations of major cardiovascular risk factors with VTE outcomes (including subtypes)? How do these associations compare with those for coronary heart disease (CHD), a manifestation of arterial thrombotic disease?

Methods

Data Sources and Participant Inclusion

We analyzed data from the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC), a consortium of prospective cohort studies with information on a variety of risk factors, and the UK Biobank, a single large prospective study. Both the ERFC and UK Biobank have been described previously.[27,28] Both data sources involve a prospective cohort study design and accessible individual participant data, enabling standardized and detailed analyses using a common protocol, including definitions for VTE and CHD outcomes. However, we conducted parallel (rather than pooled) analyses of the 2 sources because of potentially important differences in their approaches to VTE ascertainment, ie, the ERFC recorded only fatal VTE outcomes while UK Biobank recorded both fatal and nonfatal VTE outcomes, most of which were nonfatal. Information about each of the 76 studies contributing to this analysis is provided in the eAppendix in the Supplement. The study was designed and conducted by the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration academic coordinating center, and it was approved by the Cambridgeshire Ethics Review Committee. Informed consent was obtained from participants in each of the cohorts contributing to the analysis. Participants in the contributing studies were eligible for inclusion in the current analysis if they met all of the following criteria: (1) had recorded information on several established cardiovascular risk factors (as a minimum, information on age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and body mass index [BMI]), (2) did not have a known baseline history of cardiovascular disease (CVD; defined as CHD, other heart disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, or cardiovascular surgery) or VTE (defined as DVT or PE), and (3) had at least 1 year of follow-up data after baseline. In the ERFC, only fatal VTE events were recorded. Ascertainment was based on death certificates supplemented in 56 studies by medical records, findings on autopsy, and other sources. In UK Biobank, fatal and nonfatal VTEs were ascertained through linkage with routinely collected medical records. We attempted to subcategorize VTEs as provoked and unprovoked using a pragmatic approach that required inference from routine records (eAppendix in the Supplement). Briefly, following the example of previous work,[13] we defined VTE as provoked if, in the 90-day period preceding the VTE, the participant was recorded as having a malignant neoplasm (per cancer registry data); starting or ending a hospital episode with a main diagnosis code relating to malignant neoplasm, heart failure, infectious disease, or trauma; or having a hospital episode that included certain types of surgical procedures. The specific International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) codes and Classification of Interventions and Procedures codes that are included in our definition are summarized in the eAppendix in the Supplement. All studies used definitions of CHD based on World Health Organization (or similar) criteria. In registering fatal outcomes, the contributing studies classified deaths according to the primary cause (or, in its absence, the underlying cause) on the basis of ICD-8, ICD-9, and ICD-10 codes to at least 3 digits or according to study-specific classification systems. In the ERFC, baseline surveys were given between February 1960 and June 2008, and the date of latest follow-up was December 2015 (median, 2014 across studies); in the UK Biobank, baseline surveys were given between March 2006 and September 2010, and the date of latest follow-up was February 2016.

Statistical Analysis

For continuous risk factors, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) per 1-SD higher usual risk factor level. For binary risk factors, we compared presence vs absence of the factor. Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for age, smoking status, history of diabetes, and BMI and stratified by study, sex, and (when appropriate) trial arm. To avoid overadjustment, we did not routinely adjust for systolic blood pressure or lipid measurements (which, for example, can mediate the effects of adiposity). Similarly, we did not adjust for BMI when analyzing other measures of adiposity (eg, waist circumference). Participants in the UK Biobank were censored at first nonfatal CVD event, death, or study exit, whichever occurred first. Participants in ERFC were censored at death or study exit. Because nonfatal CVD may result in hospitalization (which may, in turn, lead to VTE outcomes), sensitivity analyses additionally censored at the first nonfatal CVD event in ERFC. To correct for regression dilution caused by variability in levels of continuous risk factors, we regressed serial measurements of risk factors obtained from up to 146 749 participants in ERFC (mean interval, 8.4 years) and up to 24 235 participants in UK Biobank (mean interval, 5.2 years) on baseline levels of the relevant characteristics. Correction for within-person variation in risk factors was achieved by use of conditional expectations of long-term average levels (termed usual levels) of the risk factors, which were predicted from regression calibration models and used in estimation of HRs, as described previously.[29] To characterize shapes of associations, HRs calculated within overall fifths of baseline exposure values were plotted against mean usual values of the relevant risk factor within each fifth. We used the Plummer method to estimate 95% CIs from the variances that corresponded to the amount of information underlying each group (including the reference category).[30] Because a further aim of the study was to compare associations of risk factors with VTE vs CHD outcomes within the same cohorts, we defined a competing risk model using a record duplication approach, allowing for simultaneous cause-specific hazard regression to estimate cause-specific HRs for each type of event. In ERFC, we stratified the cause-specific regression model by cohort to allow for a different baseline hazard function in each study. We tested for differences in associations with VTE vs CHD based on the interaction between each exposure variable and the event type indicator variable.[31] Analyses were carried out in Stata version 13 (StataCorp). Because of the number of statistical tests done, principal emphasis was given to findings with a P value less than .001, and all P values were 2-sided.

Results

Data were available for 731 728 participants from 75 ERFC cohorts and 421 537 participants from UK Biobank (Table) (eTable 1 in the Supplement). The mean (SD) age at baseline was 51.9 (9.0) years in ERFC and 56.4 (8.1) years in UK Biobank; 403 396 participants (55.1%) in the ERFC and 233 699 (55.4%) in UK Biobank were female. Most participants in ERFC were enrolled in either Europe (369 757 of 731 728 [50.5%]) or North America (315 278 of 731 728 [43.1%]). During a median follow-up of 15.4 years, 1041 fatal VTE events and 25 131 fatal CHD events were recorded in the ERFC. In UK Biobank, 2321 fatal or nonfatal VTE events and 3385 fatal or nonfatal CHD events were recorded during a median follow-up of 6.1 years.
Table.

Summary of Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes Recorded

CharacteristicERFCUK Biobanka
No. of CohortsNo.MeasureNo.Measure
Demographic and lifestyle factors, No. (%)
Age at baseline survey, mean (SD), y75731 72851.9 (9.0)421 53756.4 (8.1)
Male70731 728328 332 (44.9)421 537187 838 (44.6)
Current smoker75731 728222 016 (30.3)421 53743 847 (10.4)
History of diabetes74731 72825 982 (3.6)421 53717 622 (4.2)
Current alcohol drinker58386 831271 499 (70.2)421 197389 507 (92.5)
Anthropometric and physical markers, mean (SD)
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg73566 724131 (19)421 179137 (19)
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg72565 89580.0 (10.9)421 18182.2 (10.1)
Body mass indexb75731 72825.4 (4.2)421 53727.2 (4.7)
Waist-to-hip ratio34264 7870.85 (0.08)421 4400.87 (0.09)
Waist circumference, cm36265 46587.6 (12.5)421 46489.6 (13.2)
Lipid-related markers, mean (SD)
Total cholesterol levels, mg/dL68455 177222.0 (43.6)NANA
Non-HDL cholesterol levels, mg/dL57311 888171.0 (44.8)NANA
HDL cholesterol levels, mg/dL57312 20752.9 (14.7)NANA
Log triglyceride levels, mg/dLc56322 0964.79 (0.53)NANA
Apolipoprotein B levels, mg/dL2080 712103 (29)NANA
Apolipoprotein A1 levels, mg/dL2084 483137 (33)NANA
Log Lp(a) levels, mg/dLd1866 3822.20 (1.20)NANA
Metabolic and inflammatory markers, mean (SD)
Fasting glucose levels, mg/dL33130 32288.5 (24.3)NANA
Log CRP levels, mg/Le2870 8550.46 (1.07)NANA
Fibrinogen levels, mg/dL29115 002241.2 (68.7)NANA
Albumin levels, g/dL25115 3094.29 (0.39)NANA
Study period, median (5th centile-95th centile)f
Baseline survey year75731 7281986 (1971-2000)421 5372009 (2007-2010)
Latest follow-up year75731 7282004 (1989-2011)421 5372016 (2016-2016)
Outcomes, No.
Time to event or censoring, median (5th centile-95th centile), y75731 72815.4 (5.5-32.0)421 5376.1 (4.8-7.5)
Total follow up, person-years in millions75731 72812.807421 5372.566
Non-fatal MINAgNANA421 5372808
Fatal CHD75731 72825 131421 537577
VTE75731 7281041421 5372321
Nonfatal VTENAgNANA421 5372234
Fatal VTE75731 7281041421 53787
Pulmonary embolism75731 728855421 5371273
Deep venous thromboembolism75731 728186421 5371048
Unprovoked VTENANANA421 5371465
Provoked VTENANANA421 537856

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; ERFC, Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); MI, myocardial infarction; NA, not applicable; PE, pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

SI conversion factor: To convert cholesterol to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259; triglycerides to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0113; apolipoprotein to grams per liter, multiply by 0.01; Lp(a) to micromoles per liter, multiply by 0.0357; fasting glucose to micromoles per liter, multiply by 0.0555; CRP to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 9.524; fibrinogen to grams per liter, multiply by 0.01; and albumin to grams per liter, multiply by 10.

At the time of these analyses, data on plasma biomarkers were not available in UK Biobank.

Body mass index calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Median (interquartile range) triglyceride level was 117 (82-170) mg/dL.

Median (interquartile range) Lp(a) level was 9 (4-25) mg/dL.

Median (interquartile range) CRP level was 1.48 (0.72-3.15) mg/dL.

Follow-up and outcome summaries among participants with complete data on age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and body mass index.

Most of the studies in ERFC did not ascertain nonfatal VTE outcomes; hence, analyses in ERFC were restricted to comparison of fatal CHD outcomes only.

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; ERFC, Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); MI, myocardial infarction; NA, not applicable; PE, pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism. SI conversion factor: To convert cholesterol to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259; triglycerides to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0113; apolipoprotein to grams per liter, multiply by 0.01; Lp(a) to micromoles per liter, multiply by 0.0357; fasting glucose to micromoles per liter, multiply by 0.0555; CRP to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 9.524; fibrinogen to grams per liter, multiply by 0.01; and albumin to grams per liter, multiply by 10. At the time of these analyses, data on plasma biomarkers were not available in UK Biobank. Body mass index calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Median (interquartile range) triglyceride level was 117 (82-170) mg/dL. Median (interquartile range) Lp(a) level was 9 (4-25) mg/dL. Median (interquartile range) CRP level was 1.48 (0.72-3.15) mg/dL. Follow-up and outcome summaries among participants with complete data on age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and body mass index. Most of the studies in ERFC did not ascertain nonfatal VTE outcomes; hence, analyses in ERFC were restricted to comparison of fatal CHD outcomes only. Associations of several risk factors with VTE were approximately log-linear (Figure 1). Older age was associated with higher risk of VTE, with an approximately 2.8-fold higher risk per decade in ERFC and 1.8-fold higher risk per decade in UK Biobank (Figure 2). Compared with females, males had a higher risk of VTE in UK Biobank (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.32-1.56), somewhat less so in ERFC (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.998-1.38). Current smoking was associated with VTE risk in ERFC (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20-1.58), but somewhat less so in UK Biobank (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.40). Markers of adiposity (BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference) were positively associated with higher VTE risk in both ERFC and UK Biobank. For example, HRs per 1-SD higher BMI were 1.43 (95% CI, 1.35-1.50) in ERFC and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.32-1.41) in UK Biobank. Current alcohol consumption was inversely associated with VTE risk in both ERFC (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93) and UK Biobank (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94). In exploratory analyses restricted to current drinkers in UK Biobank (which should limit the effects of certain residual biases, such as reverse causality related to sick quitters[32]), we found that the inverse association between amount of alcohol consumed and VTE risk persisted (eFigure 1 in the Supplement).
Figure 1.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) by 10-Year Age Groups and Fifths of Continuous Factors

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). The reference category is age 50 to 59 years for age and is the bottom fifth for all other continuous variables. Associations involve Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC) data for fatal VTE and UK Biobank data for VTE. Data on cholesterol and triglyceride levels were unavailable in UK Biobank at the time of analysis. Most UK Biobank participants were aged between 40 and 69 years at baseline. The dotted line indicates the reference value. HDL indicates high-density lipoprotein.

Figure 2.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) for Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). Associations involve Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC) data for fatal VTE and UK Biobank data for VTE. CRP indicates C-reactive protein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a).

aHazard ratios are presented per 1-SD higher usual risk factor level unless otherwise indicated.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) by 10-Year Age Groups and Fifths of Continuous Factors

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). The reference category is age 50 to 59 years for age and is the bottom fifth for all other continuous variables. Associations involve Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC) data for fatal VTE and UK Biobank data for VTE. Data on cholesterol and triglyceride levels were unavailable in UK Biobank at the time of analysis. Most UK Biobank participants were aged between 40 and 69 years at baseline. The dotted line indicates the reference value. HDL indicates high-density lipoprotein.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) for Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). Associations involve Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC) data for fatal VTE and UK Biobank data for VTE. CRP indicates C-reactive protein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a). aHazard ratios are presented per 1-SD higher usual risk factor level unless otherwise indicated. By contrast, for some other risk factors we studied, we noted potentially directionally discordant associations across ERFC and UK Biobank. For example, 1-SD higher systolic blood pressure was not associated with risk of VTE in ERFC (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.95-1.19) but was inversely associated with risk of VTE in UK Biobank (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90). Conversely, 1-SD higher diastolic blood pressure was associated with higher risk of VTE in ERFC (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.42) but was not associated with risk of VTE in UK Biobank (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.02). In ERFC, history of diabetes was associated with higher risk of VTE (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.33-2.16) as was 1-SD higher fasting baseline glucose concentration (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48), while in UK Biobank, history of diabetes was inversely associated with risk of VTE (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.99). To investigate whether these discordant associations chiefly reflected the different VTE outcomes recorded across ERFC and UK Biobank, we restricted analysis to the UK Biobank (which had recorded both fatal and nonfatal VTE outcomes). In UK Biobank–specific analyses, we found a similar pattern of difference of HRs for fatal vs nonfatal VTEs with blood pressure and diabetes to that observed in our comparison across ERFC and UK Biobank (eFigure 2 in the Supplement). This result suggests that blood pressure and diabetes may have differing associations with fatal vs nonfatal VTEs. At the time of our analysis, data on plasma biomarkers were available in the ERFC but not in UK Biobank (Figure 2). In the ERFC, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A, and lipoprotein(a) levels each showed suggestively inverse associations with risk of VTE, whereas triglyceride, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels each showed no associations. Fasting glucose, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels were each associated with higher risk of VTE. In analyses comparing PE with DVT, higher BMI and higher waist circumference had stronger associations with PE than DVT (Figure 3). Further analyses that subcategorized VTE outcomes as provoked vs unprovoked in UK Biobank did not reveal major differences in the associations of most CVD risk factors, with the exceptions of older age and male sex (Figure 4).
Figure 3.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Pulmonary Embolism (PE) vs Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) for Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors in UK Biobank

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). Associations involve UK Biobank data only.

aHazard ratios are presented per 1-SD higher usual risk factor level unless otherwise indicated.

Figure 4.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Unprovoked vs Provoked Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) for Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors in UK Biobank

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). Associations involve UK Biobank data only.

aHazard ratios are presented per 1-SD higher usual risk factor level unless otherwise indicated.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Pulmonary Embolism (PE) vs Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) for Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors in UK Biobank

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). Associations involve UK Biobank data only. aHazard ratios are presented per 1-SD higher usual risk factor level unless otherwise indicated.

Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Unprovoked vs Provoked Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) for Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors in UK Biobank

All comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes, and usual body mass index (BMI) (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference were not adjusted for usual BMI). Associations involve UK Biobank data only. aHazard ratios are presented per 1-SD higher usual risk factor level unless otherwise indicated. In analyses comparing VTE with CHD outcomes, associations were stronger for CHD in both ERFC and UK Biobank for most risk factors, including age, male sex, current smoking status, history of diabetes, higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and proatherogenic lipid levels (eFigures 3 and 4 in the Supplement). In contrast, higher BMI and waist circumference had somewhat stronger associations with VTE compared with CHD, whereas circulating inflammatory markers were associated with both conditions to a broadly similar extent (eFigures 3 and 4 in the Supplement). Findings were broadly similar in sensitivity analyses that did not adjust for BMI (eTable 2 in the Supplement), excluded participants with history of cancer diagnosis at baseline (eFigure 5 in the Supplement), censored for first CVD events in ERFC (eFigure 6 in the Supplement), and used baseline levels of risk factors, except for the expected decrease in the magnitudes of association when not correcting for within-person variability in the continuous variables (eFigures 7-9 in the Supplement).

Discussion

In this analysis of individual-level data on several established cardiovascular risk factors from more than 1.1 million participants in 76 cohorts, we found that older age, smoking, and higher levels of adiposity were clearly associated with higher risk of VTE. These findings suggest that there is overlap in at least some major population determinants of important venous and arterial thrombotic diseases. Our study characterized dose-response associations between several clinical measures of adiposity (eg, waist circumference and BMI) and VTE risk and showed no evidence of a threshold below which leaner body habitus stopped being associated with lower VTE risk. The association of obesity with VTE is supported by previous mendelian randomization studies of genetic variants associated with increased adiposity, which are also associated with increased risk of VTE.[33,34] Furthermore, we found that associations of BMI and waist circumference were somewhat stronger with PE vs DVT and about twice as strong with VTE vs CHD. These data suggest that efforts to combat the entire spectrum of obesity and overweight should yield important benefits for VTE prevention. As regards risk behaviors, our study confirmed the known association of current smoking with risk of VTE.[9,13] This association was similar in magnitude for PE and DVT outcomes but weaker than that observed for CHD. Previous studies have suggested that much of the excess risk of VTE in smokers was because of increased hospitalization for smoking-related diseases, including cancer.[35,36] However, in our analysis, smoking was similarly associated with both provoked and unprovoked VTE; furthermore, HRs did not change appreciably after exclusion of participants with history of cancer diagnosis at baseline. We also noted a pattern of association between alcohol consumption and VTE similar to that reported in previous studies of alcohol consumption and nonfatal myocardial infarction.[32,37,38] (By contrast, alcohol consumption has previously been positively associated with risks of fatal coronary disease, stroke, and heart failure.) Although previous studies have reported that moderate alcohol consumption is associated with lower levels of hemostatic factors (eg, fibrinogen, factor VII, and von Willebrand factor),[39,40] further studies are needed to determine whether moderate alcohol consumption has a causal role in VTE. Our study identified potentially inverse associations of proatherogenic lipid levels with VTE. For example, apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) levels were each associated with lower risk of VTE, a finding that awaits further elucidation.[41] Proinflammatory soluble biomarkers (eg, C-reactive protein) were positively associated with VTE, a finding consistent with the associations we observed for CHD outcomes. Although previous mendelian randomization studies suggest that CRP and fibrinogen levels are unlikely to be direct causal factors in CHD,[42,43] such genetic epidemiological data are sparser in relation to VTE. It is not clear why our study found inconsistent associations of blood pressure and history of diabetes with VTE outcomes across UK Biobank and the ERFC. One potential explanation is that these data sources recorded mostly differing types of VTE outcomes, ie, UK Biobank involved mostly nonfatal outcomes whereas ERFC involved only fatal outcomes. Our exploratory analysis of UK Biobank data was consistent with this explanation, as it found differing results with blood pressure and diabetes for fatal VTE vs nonfatal VTE similar to those observed in comparisons across UK Biobank and the ERFC. However, future studies with more detailed clinical information will be needed to understand these possible differences with greater confidence.

Strengths and Limitations

Our study had major strengths. It avoided the limitations of retrospective case-control study designs by analyzing prospective cohort data on more than 1.1 million participants without CVD at baseline. Access to individual participant data avoided the limitations of literature-based meta-analyses. It also enabled a common approach to adjustment for potential confounding factors, time-to-event analyses, correction for regression dilution bias, and head-to-head comparisons of VTE and CHD. We explored idiopathic VTE vs VTE provoked by established risk factors (such as cancer or prolonged immobility), albeit using pragmatic record-based definitions.[44] The generalizability of our results was enhanced by inclusion of data from 75 prospective studies in ERFC recruited from 1960 through 2008 in 18 different countries. To enhance power and evaluate the relevance of findings to the contemporary situation, we included data from UK Biobank, which recruited participants from 2006 to 2010. Our study also had limitations. We did not routinely have information in ERFC data on non-CVD risk factors for VTE (eg, oral contraception use) or medication use (eg, anticoagulants). Misclassification of disease outcomes could have arisen from inaccuracies in hospital discharge records and death certificates, diluting the strength of the observed associations.[45,46,47] However, 2 observations argue against major disease misclassification in our study. First, we observed associations of measures of adiposity with VTE risk similar in size to those previously reported in much smaller studies based on detailed validation of VTE events.[6] Second, we observed directionally opposite associations of proatherogenic lipid levels with VTE and CHD outcomes despite the 2 conditions having similar clinical presentations.

Conclusions

Among a panel of several established cardiovascular risk factors, older age, smoking, and adiposity were consistently associated with higher VTE risk. There is overlap in at least some of the major population determinants of important venous and arterial thrombotic diseases.
  47 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  S Takach Lapner; C Kearon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-20

2.  Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  M Miniati; R Prediletto; B Formichi; C Marini; G Di Ricco; L Tonelli; G Allescia; M Pistolesi
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Assessing the causal relationship between obesity and venous thromboembolism through a Mendelian Randomization study.

Authors:  Sara Lindström; Marine Germain; Marta Crous-Bou; Erin N Smith; Pierre-Emmanuel Morange; Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg; Hugoline G de Haan; Daniel Chasman; Paul Ridker; Jennifer Brody; Mariza de Andrade; John A Heit; Weihong Tang; Immaculata DeVivo; Francine Grodstein; Nicholas L Smith; David Tregouet; Christopher Kabrhel
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Alcohol consumption and hemostatic factors: analysis of the Framingham Offspring cohort.

Authors:  K J Mukamal; P P Jadhav; R B D'Agostino; J M Massaro; M A Mittleman; I Lipinska; P A Sutherland; T Matheney; D Levy; P W Wilson; R C Ellison; H Silbershatz; J E Muller; G H Tofler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology.

Authors:  Albert W Tsai; Mary Cushman; Wayne D Rosamond; Susan R Heckbert; Joseph F Polak; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-27

6.  Serum lipid levels and the risk of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Carine J M Doggen; Nicholas L Smith; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Susan R Heckbert; Frits R Rosendaal; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 7.  Effects of lifestyle on hemostasis, fibrinolysis, and platelet reactivity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaeng W Lee; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-27

8.  UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age.

Authors:  Cathie Sudlow; John Gallacher; Naomi Allen; Valerie Beral; Paul Burton; John Danesh; Paul Downey; Paul Elliott; Jane Green; Martin Landray; Bette Liu; Paul Matthews; Giok Ong; Jill Pell; Alan Silman; Alan Young; Tim Sprosen; Tim Peakman; Rory Collins
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Risk thresholds for alcohol consumption: combined analysis of individual-participant data for 599 912 current drinkers in 83 prospective studies.

Authors:  Angela M Wood; Stephen Kaptoge; Adam S Butterworth; Peter Willeit; Samantha Warnakula; Thomas Bolton; Ellie Paige; Dirk S Paul; Michael Sweeting; Stephen Burgess; Steven Bell; William Astle; David Stevens; Albert Koulman; Randi M Selmer; W M Monique Verschuren; Shinichi Sato; Inger Njølstad; Mark Woodward; Veikko Salomaa; Børge G Nordestgaard; Bu B Yeap; Astrid Fletcher; Olle Melander; Lewis H Kuller; Beverley Balkau; Michael Marmot; Wolfgang Koenig; Edoardo Casiglia; Cyrus Cooper; Volker Arndt; Oscar H Franco; Patrik Wennberg; John Gallacher; Agustín Gómez de la Cámara; Henry Völzke; Christina C Dahm; Caroline E Dale; Manuela M Bergmann; Carlos J Crespo; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Rudolf Kaaks; Leon A Simons; Pagona Lagiou; Josje D Schoufour; Jolanda M A Boer; Timothy J Key; Beatriz Rodriguez; Conchi Moreno-Iribas; Karina W Davidson; James O Taylor; Carlotta Sacerdote; Robert B Wallace; J Ramon Quiros; Rosario Tumino; Dan G Blazer; Allan Linneberg; Makoto Daimon; Salvatore Panico; Barbara Howard; Guri Skeie; Timo Strandberg; Elisabete Weiderpass; Paul J Nietert; Bruce M Psaty; Daan Kromhout; Elena Salamanca-Fernandez; Stefan Kiechl; Harlan M Krumholz; Sara Grioni; Domenico Palli; José M Huerta; Jackie Price; Johan Sundström; Larraitz Arriola; Hisatomi Arima; Ruth C Travis; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Anna Karakatsani; Antonia Trichopoulou; Tilman Kühn; Diederick E Grobbee; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Natasja van Schoor; Heiner Boeing; Kim Overvad; Jussi Kauhanen; Nick Wareham; Claudia Langenberg; Nita Forouhi; Maria Wennberg; Jean-Pierre Després; Mary Cushman; Jackie A Cooper; Carlos J Rodriguez; Masaru Sakurai; Jonathan E Shaw; Matthew Knuiman; Trudy Voortman; Christa Meisinger; Anne Tjønneland; Hermann Brenner; Luigi Palmieri; Jean Dallongeville; Eric J Brunner; Gerd Assmann; Maurizio Trevisan; Richard F Gillum; Ian Ford; Naveed Sattar; Mariana Lazo; Simon G Thompson; Pietro Ferrari; David A Leon; George Davey Smith; Richard Peto; Rod Jackson; Emily Banks; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; John Danesh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 202.731

10.  Association between C reactive protein and coronary heart disease: mendelian randomisation analysis based on individual participant data.

Authors:  Frances Wensley; Pei Gao; Stephen Burgess; Stephen Kaptoge; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Tina Shah; James C Engert; Robert Clarke; George Davey-Smith; Børge G Nordestgaard; Danish Saleheen; Nilesh J Samani; Manjinder Sandhu; Sonia Anand; Mark B Pepys; Liam Smeeth; John Whittaker; Juan Pablo Casas; Simon G Thompson; Aroon D Hingorani; John Danesh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-15
View more
  52 in total

1.  Circulating Serum Copper Is Associated with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, but Not Venous Thromboembolism: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Richard S Dey; Jari A Laukkanen
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-19

2.  Predictive value of admission glycemia in diabetics with pulmonary embolism compared to non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Ljiljana Jovanovic; Milena Rajkovic; Vesna Subota; Bojana Subotic; Boris Dzudovic; Jovan Matijasevic; Marija Benic; Sonja Salinger; Stefan Simovic; Vladimir Miloradovic; Tamara Preradovic Kovacevic; Ljiljana Kos; Aleksandar Neskovic; Srdjan Kafedzic; Natasa Markovic Nikolic; Bjanka Bozovic; Nebojsa Bulatovic; Slobodan Obradovic
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  No prospective association of a polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease with venous thromboembolism incidence.

Authors:  Aaron R Folsom; Paul S de Vries; Mary Cushman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Thromboembolic Events in a Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Population with COVID-19 Admitted to a Medicalized Hotel in Madrid.

Authors:  Karen Lizzette Ramírez-Cervantes; Consuelo Huerta-Álvarez; Manuel Quintana-Díaz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Coagulation factor VIIa binds to herpes simplex virus 1-encoded glycoprotein C forming a factor X-enhanced tenase complex oriented on membranes.

Authors:  Bryan H Lin; Michael R Sutherland; Federico I Rosell; James H Morrissey; Edward L G Pryzdial
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Rosuvastatin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the HOPE-3 and JUPITER randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Philip Joseph; Robert Glynn; Eva Lonn; Chinthanie Ramasundarahettige; John Eikelboom; Jean MacFadyen; Paul Ridker; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Old Stroke Patients: A Subgroup Analysis of the DEFENSE-PFO Trial.

Authors:  Hanim Kwon; Pil Hyung Lee; Jae-Kwan Song; Sun U Kwon; Dong-Wha Kang; Jong S Kim
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

8.  Circulating Serum Magnesium and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Men: A Long-Term Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Jari A Laukkanen
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-13

9.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: do they differ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Gulsen Ozen; Sofia Pedro; Rebecca Schumacher; Teresa Simon; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-06

10.  Reporting of Thromboembolic Events with JAK Inhibitors: Analysis of the FAERS Database 2010-2019.

Authors:  Juliana Setyawan; Nassir Azimi; Vibeke Strand; Andres Yarur; Moshe Fridman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.