Literature DB >> 7555172

Prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism among patients in a general hospital and at autopsy.

P D Stein1, J W Henry.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation is to estimate the prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in a general hospital, its frequency among patients who died, and the ability of physicians to diagnose PE antemortem.
METHODS: The prevalence of acute PE among 51,645 patients hospitalized over a 21-month period was assessed in 1 of the 6 clinical centers (Henry Ford Hospital) that participated in the collaborative study, prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The diagnosis of PE was made by pulmonary angiography, or in those who did not undergo pulmonary angiography because they declined or were ineligible for randomization to angiography in PIOPED, the diagnosis was based on the ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scan. Based on data in PIOPED, PE was considered to be present in 87% of patients with high probability V/Q scam interpretations, 30% with intermediate probability interpretations, 14% with low probability interpretations, and 4% with nearly normal V/Q scans.
RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of acute PE in hospitalized patients was 526 of 51,645 (1.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 1.1%). Based on extrapolated data from autopsy, PE was estimated to have caused or contributed to death in 122 of 51,645 (0.2%; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.29%). Pulmonary embolism was observed at autopsy in 59 of 404 (14.6%; 95% CI, 11.3 to 18.4%). Among patients with PE at autopsy, the PE caused or contributed to death in 22 of 59 (37.3%; 95% CI, 25.0 to 50.9%) and PE was incidental in 37 of 59 (62.7%; 95% CI, 49.1 to 75.0%). Among patients at autopsy who died from PE, the diagnosis was unsuspected in 14 of 20 (70.0%; 95% CI, 45.7 to 88.1%). Most of these patients had advanced associated disease. In these patients, death from PE occurred within 2.5 h in 13 of 14 (92.9%; 95% CI, 66.1 to 99.8%).
CONCLUSION: Pulmonary embolism is common in a general hospital. The prevalence of PE at autopsy has not changed over 3 decades. The frequency of unsuspected PE in patients at autopsy has not diminished. Even among patients who die from PE, the PE is usually unsuspected. Such patients, however, typically have advanced disease. Among moribund patients, incidental PE is rarely diagnosed. Patients who suffer sudden unexplained catastrophic events in the hospital are a group in whom the diagnosis might be suspected more frequently if physicians maintain a high index of suspicion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7555172     DOI: 10.1378/chest.108.4.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  99 in total

Review 1.  The use of nuclear medicine techniques in the emergency department.

Authors:  B S McGlone; K K Balan
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Value-of-information analysis to reduce decision uncertainty associated with the choice of thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement in the Irish healthcare setting.

Authors:  Laura McCullagh; Cathal Walsh; Michael Barry
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Pharmacological thromboembolic prophylaxis in a medical ward: room for improvement.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; Emmanuèle Guignard; André Pannatier; Jacques Cornuz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Is autopsy dead in the ICU?

Authors:  A Esteban; P Fernández-Segoviano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Variation in physician deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis attitudes and practices at an academic tertiary care center.

Authors:  Erin M Galbraith; Bonnie M Vautaw; Mary Grzybowski; Peter K Henke; Tomas W Wakefield; James B Froehlich
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  The autopsy and diagnosis of pulmonary thrombo-embolism.

Authors:  Milton J Micallef
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Frequency of thromboprophylaxis and incidence of in-hospital venous thromboembolism in a cohort of emergency department patients.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Zachary Fordham; Vasilios Yiannibas; Charles L Johnson; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Authors:  Jonathan Laryea; Bradley Champagne
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-09

Review 9.  [Errors and risks in perioperative thrombolysis therapy].

Authors:  F Spöhr; B W Böttiger; A Walther
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.