| Literature DB >> 21637325 |
Deepmoni Deka1, P Bhargavi, Ashish Sharma, Dinesh Goyal, M Jawed, Arun Goyal.
Abstract
The cellulase activity of Bacillus subtilis AS3 was enhanced by optimizing the medium composition by statistical methods. The enzyme activity with unoptimised medium with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) was 0.07 U/mL and that was significantly enhanced by CMC, peptone, and yeast extract using Placket-Burman design. The combined effects of these nutrients on cellulase activity were studied using 2(2) full factorial central composite design. The optimal levels of medium components determined were CMC (1.8%), peptone (0.8%), and yeast extract (0.479%). The maximum enzyme activity predicted by the model was 0.49 U/mL which was in good agreement with the experimental value 0.43 U/mL showing 6-fold increase as compared to unoptimised medium. The enzyme showed multisubstrate specificity, showing significantly higher activity with lichenan and β-glucan and lower activity with laminarin, hydroxyethylcellulose, and steam exploded bagasse. The optimised medium with lichenan or β-glucan showed 2.5- or 2.8-fold higher activity, respectively, at same concentration as of CMC.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21637325 PMCID: PMC3102325 DOI: 10.4061/2011/151656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Enzyme Res ISSN: 2090-0414
Plackett-Burman design in coded units and real values (in parenthesis) in g/L for seven variables along with the cellulase activity.
| Run | CMC ( | Peptone ( | YE ( | K2HPO4 ( | MgSO4·7H2O ( | FeSO4·7H2O ( | MnCl2·4H2O ( | E.A (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | +1 (18) | −1 (2) | −1 (1) | −1 (0.5) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.01) | 0.084 |
| (2) | −1 (2) | −1 (2) | −1 (1) | −1 (0.5) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.1) | 0.003 |
| (3) | −1 (2) | +1 (8) | +1 (9) | +1 (2) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.01) | 0.080 |
| (4) | +1 (18) | −1 (2) | +1 (9) | +1 (2) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.01) | 0.226 |
| (5) | −1 (2) | −1 (2) | −1 (1) | +1 (2) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.01) | 0.004 |
| (6) | +1 (18) | +1 (8) | +1 (9) | +1 (2) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.1) | 0.252 |
| (7) | +1 (18) | +1 (8) | −1 (1) | +1 (2) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.01) | 0.221 |
| (8) | −1 (2) | +1 (8) | +1 (9) | −1 (0.5) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.01) | 0.026 |
| (9) | +1 (18) | −1 (2) | +1 (9) | +1 (2) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.01) | 0.205 |
| (10) | −1 (2) | −1 (2) | −1 (1) | −1 (0.5) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.01) | 0.006 |
| (11) | −1 (2) | +1 (8) | +1 (9) | −1 (0.5) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.01) | 0.049 |
| (12) | +1 (18) | +1 (8) | −1 (1) | −1 (0.5) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.01) | 0.168 |
| (13) | +1 (18) | −1 (2) | −1 (1) | +1 (2) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.1) | 0.102 |
| (14) | +1 (18) | −1 (2) | +1 (9) | −1 (0.5) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.1) | 0.197 |
| (15) | −1 (2) | −1 (2) | +1 (9) | −1 (0.5) | +1 (0.45) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.1) | 0.024 |
| (16) | −1 (2) | +1 (8) | −1 (1) | +1 (2) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.1) | 0.003 |
| (17) | +1 (18) | +1 (8) | −1 (1) | −1 (0.5) | −1 (0.05) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.1) | 0.214 |
| (18) | +1 (18) | +1 (8) | +1 (9) | −1 (0.5) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.1) | 0.249 |
| (19) | −1 (2) | +1 (8) | −1 (1) | +1 (2) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.1) | 0.025 |
| (20) | −1 (2) | −1 (2) | +1 (9) | +1 (2) | −1 (0.05) | +1 (0.45) | +1 (0.1) | 0.022 |
Statistical analysis of Plackett Burman design showing coefficient values, t- and P-value for each variable.
| Variable | Coefficient | Confidence level (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.107817 | 15.96 | .000 | 100 |
| CMC ( | 0.083852 | 12.41 | .000 | 100 |
| Peptone ( | 0.020703 | 3.06 | .01 | 99 |
| Yeast Extract ( | 0.024881 | 3.68 | .003 | 99.7 |
| K2HPO4 ( | 0.005974 | 0.88 | .394 | 60.6* |
| MgSO4·7H2O ( | −0.005107 | −0.76 | .464 | 53.6* |
| FeSO4·7H2O ( | −0.009733 | −1.44 | .175 | 82.5* |
| MnCl2·4H2O ( | 0.001163 | 0.17 | .866 | 13.4* |
*Insignificant values.
Full factorial central composite design matrix of three variables in coded units and real values (in parenthesis) with experimental and predicted response.
| Run No | CMC ( | Peptone ( | Yeast extract ( | Enzyme activity (U/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted | Observed | ||||
| (1) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.270 | 0.271 |
| (2) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.270 | 0.271 |
| (3) | 1 (14.76) | −1 (3.22) | 1 (7.38) | 0.341 | 0.330 |
| (4) | −1 (5.24) | −1 (3.22) | −1 (2.62) | 0.122 | 0.123 |
| (5) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.270 | 0.272 |
| (6) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.270 | 0.261 |
| (7) | − | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.118 | 0.119 |
| (8) | 1 (14.76) | −1 (3.22) | −1 (2.62) | 0.313 | 0.306 |
| (9) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.270 | 0.274 |
| (10) | −1 (5.24) | −1 (3.22) | 1 (7.38) | 0.221 | 0.208 |
| (11) | −1 (5.24) | 1 (3.22) | 1 (7.38) | 0.215 | 0.214 |
| (12) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.270 | 0.271 |
| (13) | + | 0 (5) | 0 (5) | 0.422 | 0.431 |
| (14) | 1 (14.76) | 1 (6.78) | 1 (7.38) | 0.385 | 0.377 |
| (15) | 1 (14.76) | 1 (6.78) | −1 (2.62) | 0.364 | 0.371 |
| (16) | 0 (10) | − | 0 (5) | 0.269 | 0.283 |
| (17) | −1 (5.24) | 1 (6.78) | −1 (2.62) | 0.123 | 0.128 |
| (18) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | + | 0.276 | 0.292 |
| (19) | 0 (10) | + | 0 (5) | 0.307 | 0.302 |
| (20) | 0 (10) | 0 (5) | − | 0.175 | 0.168 |
ANOVA for quadratic model.
| Source | SS | DF | MS | Prob ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.133841 | 9 | 0.014871 | 123.94 | .000 |
| Residual (error) | 0.001200 | 10 | 0.000120 | ||
| Lack of fit | 0.001087 | 5 | 0.000217 | 9.66 | .013 |
| Pure error | 0.000113 | 5 | 0.000023 | ||
| Total | 0.135040 | 19 | |||
R 2 = 0.9911; Adj R2 = 0.9831
SS, sum of squares; DF, Degree of freedom; MS, mean square.
Model coefficient estimated by multiple linear regressions.
| Model term | Parameter estimate | Standard error | Computed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.270187 | 0.004467 | 60.479 | .000 |
| 0.151937 | 0.004985 | 30.480 | .000 | |
| 0.019066 | 0.004985 | 3.825 | .003 | |
| 0.050437 | 0.004985 | 10.118 | .000 | |
| 0.000199 | 0.008161 | 0.024 | .981 | |
| 0.017596 | 0.008161 | 2.16 | .056 | |
| −0.045086 | 0.008161 | −5.524 | .000 | |
| 0.035305 | 0.010954 | 3.223 | .009 | |
| −0.049972 | 0.010954 | −4.562 | .001 | |
| −0.005799 | 0.010954 | −0.529 | .608 |
Figure 1Three-dimensional response surface plot for alkaline cellulase production showing the interactive effects of medium components in g/L: (a) yeast extract and CMC median level: peptone, 5 g/L, (b) yeast extract and peptone, median level: CMC, 10 g/L; (c) CMC and peptone, median level: yeast extract, 5 g/L.
Variation of enzyme activity with CMC, lichenan, and barley β-glucan with and without medium optimisation.
| Media | CMC | Lichenan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unoptimised (U/mL) | 0.07 | 0.35 | 0.4 |
| Optimised (U/mL) | 0.43 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Fold increase | 6 | 3.4 | 3.5 |
| Maximum activity (h) | 36 | 12 | 12 |