| Literature DB >> 30644396 |
Indu Khatri1, Koelina Ganguly2, Sunandini Sharma2, Joseph Carmicheal2, Sukhwinder Kaur2, Surinder K Batra3, Manoj K Bhasin4.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of <8%. Its dismal prognosis stems from inefficient therapeutic modalities owing to the lack of understanding about pancreatic cancer pathogenesis. Considering the molecular complexity and heterogeneity of PDAC, identification of novel molecular contributors involved in PDAC onset and progression using global "omics" analysis will pave the way to improved strategies for disease prevention and therapeutic targeting. Meta-analysis of multiple miRNA microarray datasets containing healthy controls (HC), chronic pancreatitis (CP) and PDAC cases, identified 13 miRNAs involved in the progression of PDAC. These miRNAs showed dysregulation in both tissue as well as blood samples, along with progressive decrease in expression from HC to CP to PDAC. Gene-miRNA interaction analysis further elucidated 5 miRNAs (29a/b, 27a, 130b and 148a) that are significantly downregulated in conjunction with concomitant upregulation of their target genes throughout PDAC progression. Among these, miRNA-29a/b targeted genes were found to be most significantly altered in comparative profiling of HC, CP and PDAC, indicating its involvement in malignant evolution. Further, pathway analysis suggested direct involvement of miRNA-29a/b in downregulating the key pathways associated with PDAC development and metastasis including focal adhesion signaling and extracellular matrix organization. Our systems biology data analysis, in combination with real-time PCR validation indicates direct functional involvement of miRNA-29a in PDAC progression and is a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic candidate for patients with progressive disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30644396 PMCID: PMC6333820 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36328-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
List of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma omics datasets used in this study.
| Dataset | Source | Samples | References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | CP | PDAC | MPDAC | Publications | PMID | |||
| miRNA | GSE24279 (Dataset I) | Tissue | 22 | 27 | 136 | 0 | Bauer, A. S. | 22511932 |
| GSE31568 (Dataset II) | Blood | 70 | 38 | 45 | 0 | Keller, A. | 21892151 | |
| GSE61741 (Dataset III) | Blood | 94 | 37 | 45 | 0 | Keller, A. | 25465851 | |
| mRNA | E-EMBL-6 (Dataset IV) | Tissue | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | Abdollahi, A. | 17652168 |
Figure 1Identification of DE miRNAs commonly dysregulated in CP and PDAC subjects in tissue and blood datasets. (a) Venn diagram of the miRNA differentially expressed in HC vs CP conditions and common across Dataset I, II and III; and a heatmap of the miRNA differentially expressed across Dataset I and Dataset II or III where ‘HC’ represents healthy controls and ‘CP’ represent subjects with chronic pancreatitis. (b) Venn diagram of the miRNA differentially expressed in HC vs PDAC condition and common across Dataset I, II and III; and the heat map of the miRNA differentially expressed between Dataset I and Dataset II or III where ‘HC’ represents healthy controls and ‘PDAC’ represent subjects with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. (c) Venn diagram of the miRNA common in between HC vs CP and HC vs PDAC condition within Dataset I and Dataset II or III.
Log Fold Change and P-values of DE miRNA common in HC vs CP and HC vs PDAC conditions in Dataset I and Dataset II/Dataset III.
| Dataset I | Dataset II | Dataset III | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP | PDAC | CP | PDAC | CP | PDAC | |||||||
| logFC | P.Value | logFC | P.Value | logFC | P.Value | logFC | P.Value | logFC | P.Value | logFC | P.Value | |
| hsa-miR-130b | −0.93 | 0.00 | −1.66 | 0.00 | −0.14 | 0.04 | −0.14 | 0.03 | −0.24 | 0.00 | −0.27 | 0.00 |
| hsa-miR-148a | −1.06 | 0.00 | −2.09 | 0.00 | −0.32 | 0.00 | −0.25 | 0.00 | −0.28 | 0.00 | −0.28 | 0.00 |
| hsa-miR-151-3p | −0.36 | 0.00 | −0.23 | 0.00 | −0.33 | 0.00 | −0.30 | 0.00 | −0.28 | 0.00 | −0.20 | 0.01 |
| hsa-miR-194 | −0.95 | 0.00 | −0.77 | 0.00 | −0.12 | 0.01 | −0.11 | 0.01 | −0.10 | 0.02 | −0.10 | 0.01 |
| hsa-miR-200c | −0.70 | 0.00 | −1.09 | 0.00 | −0.20 | 0.04 | −0.19 | 0.04 | −0.21 | 0.03 | −0.20 | 0.02 |
| hsa-miR-217 | −1.19 | 0.00 | −2.42 | 0.00 | −0.19 | 0.04 | NA | NA | −0.21 | 0.01 | −0.20 | 0.00 |
| hsa-miR-29A | −0.19 | 0.04 | −0.23 | 0.00 | −0.17 | 0.04 | −0.24 | 0.00 | −0.19 | 0.02 | −0.26 | 0.00 |
| hsa-miR-29B | −0.55 | 0.00 | −0.47 | 0.00 | −0.25 | 0.01 | −0.28 | 0.00 | −0.24 | 0.00 | −0.22 | 0.00 |
| hsa-miR-548d-3p | −0.19 | 0.04 | −0.14 | 0.05 | −0.53 | 0.00 | −0.39 | 0.01 | −0.49 | 0.00 | −0.50 | 0.00 |
| hsa-miR-604 | −0.25 | 0.03 | −0.37 | 0.00 | −0.53 | 0.00 | −0.37 | 0.00 | −0.48 | 0.00 | −0.30 | 0.01 |
| hsa-miR-335 | −0.47 | 0.00 | −0.51 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | −0.17 | 0.02 | −0.19 | 0.01 |
| hsa-miR-379 | −0.32 | 0.00 | −0.35 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | −0.39 | 0.03 | −0.46 | 0.01 |
| hsa-miR-27b | −0.34 | 0.00 | −0.49 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | −0.30 | 0.00 | −0.15 | 0.04 |
Figure 2Identification of dysregulated genes in tissue datasets. (a) Venn diagram of the common mRNAs in HC vs CP; HC vs PDAC and HC vs MPDAC comparisons. (b) Partitioning of samples on the basis of expression profile of genes using SOM clustering method. We identified two strikingly opposite expression patterns (black ellipses). ‘n’ represents the number of samples clustered. (c) Violin plots representing the two patterns observed in SOM partitioning. (d) Top 20 GO categories of DE mRNA common across all conditions (blue bar). (e) Top 20 Pathway categories of DE mRNA common in DE progressive mRNA in all conditions.
Figure 3Study of miRNA-mRNA interactions in datasets and their enrichment. (a) Biplot showing inverse relationship between miRNA and mRNA. Along x-axis are the Log-fold change of genes and Log-fold change of interacting miRNAs are along y-axis. Upregulated genes are denoted in red. (b) Top 30 GO categories of negatively regulated genes by miRNA in HC-CP condition (orange bar) vs HC-PDAC condition (green bar) vs HC-MPDAC condition (red bar). (c) Top 20 Pathway categories of significantly affected by genes targeted by miRNA dysregulated in HC-CP condition (orange bar) vs HC-PDAC condition (green bar) vs HC-MPDAC condition (red bar). (Note: The top categories were arranged in descending order as obtained from the negatively regulated mRNAs from HC vs PDAC comparison). (d) Enrichment score for miRNA (P value < 0.05) shown in line graph and number of genes enriched in each condition shown in bar graph (e) GSEA enrichment of negatively regulated genes in HC-PDAC condition by miRNA-29a.
Figure 4Regulatory network, survival analysis and validation of miRNA-29a/b. (a) Co-expression network representing progressive increase in the negatively regulated genes by miRNA-29a/b miRNA in HC vs PDAC as compared to CP. The networks were generated through the use of IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbio-informatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis [30]. (b) Survival curve of miRNA-29a and miRNA-29b with TCGA cohort divided at 75th percentile. (c) Survival curve of additive effect of 15 mRNA markers, identified from independent survival analysis, with TCGA cohort divided at median. (d) Ct values obtained by RT-PCR analysis for miRNA-29a in the serum sample of CP (chronic Pancreatitis), EPC (Early Pancreatic Cancer) and LPC (Late Pancreatic cancer) as compared to HC. The mean and standard error of mean of Ct values from each group is shown along with individual samples denoted by a dot. The significant differences (p value < 0.05) between groups are marked with asterisk.