Literature DB >> 25157276

Down Regulation of FOXO1 Promotes Cell Proliferation in Cervical Cancer.

Shyam Babu Prasad1, Suresh Singh Yadav1, Mitali Das1, H B Govardhan2, Lakshmi Kant Pandey3, Sunita Singh4, Satyajit Pradhan2, Gopeshwar Narayan1.   

Abstract

The Forkhead transcription factor FOXO1, an important downstream target of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway, regulates cellular homeostasis by maintaining cell proliferation, apoptosis and viability in normal cells. Though, the function and regulation of FOXO1 is well documented in many cancers, the molecular mechanism of its regulation in cervical cancer is largely unknown. In the present study we have investigated the role of PI3K inhibition on FOXO1 regulation. Expression profiling of primary tumors and cell lines show over expression of PIK3CA and AKT1; and down regulation of FOXO1. Lack of FOXO1 promoter methylation and inability of hypomethylating drug 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine and HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A to reactivate FOXO1 expression suggest that loss of FOXO1 expression is due to mechanisms other than promoter methylation/acetylation. Inhibition of PI3K by LY294002 decreased the level of p-AKT1 and activated FOXO1 transcription factor. We demonstrate that activation of FOXO1 induces apoptosis, cell proliferation arrest, and decreased cell viability in cervical cancer cell lines. Our data suggest that frequent down regulation of FOXO1 and its functional inactivation may be due to post-translational modifications in cervical cancer. Together, these observations suggest that activation of FOXO1 and its nuclear sequestration is critical in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell viability and apoptosis in cervical cancer. Hence, PI3K/AKT pathway may be a potential molecular target for cervical cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis.; Cervical cancer; FOXO1; LY294002; PI3K/AKT

Year:  2014        PMID: 25157276      PMCID: PMC4142327          DOI: 10.7150/jca.6554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway is a crucial regulator of many normal cellular processes, such as cell growth, proliferation, motility, survival, and apoptosis. Deregulation of several components of this pathway, including, PIK3CA, AKT and PTEN have been well documented in a wide range of human cancers 1-3. PIK3CA, a key element of the PI3K/AKT pathway, is located at chromosomal region 3q26.3, and encodes the 110kDa catalytic subunit of class IA (PI3K). PI3K plays a role in phosphorylation of FOXO proteins via activation of its downstream kinase AKT1 4-6. FOXO family includes three functionally related members of forkhead transcription factors FOXO1a/FKHR, FOXO3a/FKHRL1, and FOXO4/AFX 7-8. The FOXO1 transcriptional activity is controlled by its post-translational modification at two or three conserved residues (Thr24, Ser256, and Ser319) resulting in its nuclear exclusion 9-11. The phosphorylation of FOXO1 results in the impairment of its DNA binding ability and increased binding affinity for 14-3-3 protein 4-6. Newly formed 14-3-3-FOXO complex is then exported from the nucleus thereby inhibiting FOXO1 dependent transcription 12. Inhibition of the PI3K pathway leads to dephosphorylation and nuclear translocation of active FKHRL1, FKHR, and AFX leading to cell growth arrest and apoptosis 13. FOXO1 regulates cell cycle regulatory proteins such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CKI/p27kip1) 14-16, and apoptosis mediators Bim, Fas ligand and Bcl-6 17, 1, 18. FOXO1 is down regulated in several cancers including endometrial carcinoma 19. Over expression of AKT1, which modulates FOXO1 activity, is frequently observed in pancreatic cancer, indicating a potential role of FOXO1 in regulation of cell cycle, proliferation and apoptosis during tumorigenesis 20-22. Since FOXO1 activity is involved in the regulation of important cellular decision and maintenance of normal cellular homeostasis, loss of its activity either by down regulation or by post-transcriptional/post-translational modifications leads to cancer development 9, 19, 23. Therefore, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the regulation of FOXO1 transcription factors may be useful in identification of molecular therapeutic targets in cervical cancer (CC). Also, the ability of FOXO1 to induce cell growth arrest, DNA repair and apoptosis makes it an attractive candidate as a tumor suppressor 24. In the present study, we hypothesized that down regulation of FOXO1 and/or its inactivation by post-translational modification may have a critical role in cervical cancer progression. Correlation of FOXO1 expression with clinicopathological parameters may provide a clue for early diagnosis.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and maintenance of CC cell lines

Normal and primary tumor samples were collected from Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS), Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi as per approved protocol by the institutional ethical committee of the IMS, BHU after patient's written informed consent. Eight cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa, SiHa, ME-180, CaSki, C-33A, C-4I, SW756 and MS751) obtained from American Type Cell Culture (ATCC, Mansas, VA) that have been extensively characterized 25-28 were kind gift from Dr. VVVS Murty (Columbia University, New York, USA). The cell lines were maintained in ATCC recommended media and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

Reverse Transcriptase-PCR and Real Time-PCR

Biopsy samples and cell lines were lysed using TRI Reagent (Sigma, USA) and total RNA was extracted as per manufacturer's protocol. The first strand cDNA was synthesized using commercially available high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (ABI, USA) as per manufacturer's protocol. PCR of cDNA was done in triplicate using gene specific primers (Supplementary Material: Table S1). Samples were then electrophoresed on a 1.8% agarose gel and visualized using ethidium bromide staining. Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with 2X SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (ABI, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The threshold cycle (CT) values were determined using ABI 7500 sequence detection system and the data was analyzed with CT values of β-actin as reference (endogenous control).

Bisulfite conversion of DNA for Methyl specific PCR (MSP)

The proximal FOXO1 promoter region was analyzed for the presence of CpG islands using the CpG island searcher (www.cpgislands.com). CpG-rich region of FOXO1 promoter, were considered as a stretch of DNA that has both a >50% GC content and an observed over expected frequency of CpG dinucleotides of >0.6 29. Phenol/Chloroform extracted genomic DNA from normal biopsy, primary tumors and CC cell lines was used for bisulfite conversion using EpiTech bisulfite conversion kit (Qiagen GmbH, Germany) by manufacturer's protocol. The proximal FOXO1 gene promoter primers were designed by Methyl Express software V1.0 (ABI, UK) for the region harboring CpG-rich islands covering -1758 to +242 bp including the transcription start site (TSS) (Supplementary Material: Fig. S1). MSP was performed using 2x PCR master mix (Fermentas, USA) with three sets of primer sequences (Supplementary Material: Table S1) for -985 to -645 bp (MSP1); -645 to -285bp (MSP2) and -225 to +242bp (MSP3) in triplicate. Placental DNA treated in vitro with SssI methyltransferase (NEB, Beverly, MA) and lymphocyte DNA were bisulfite converted and used as methylated and unmethylated controls respectively. PCR was performed using standard conditions for 30-35 cycles with annealing temperatures varying between 58ºC and 63ºC. For qualitative assessment of methylation status of FOXO1, the PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1.8% agarose gel and visualized using ethidium bromide staining.

Drug treatments

The cell lines HeLa, SiHa, ME180 and SW756 were treated with 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (AZA) (Sigma, USA) and HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA) (Sigma, USA) as described previously in 25 to reactivate FOXO1 transcription. For cell proliferation, cell viability and apoptosis, cells were initially grown in 96-well plate (1x104 cells/well) and 6-well plate (1x105 cells/well) for 24hr, followed by treatment with 10µM and 25 µM of LY294002 for 48hr.

Western blot analysis

Total cell lysates were obtained by lysing biopsy samples and cell lines with RIPA buffer containing 100mM NaCl, 50mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 2mM EGTA, 1mM EDTA, 1mM DTT, 1mM PMSF 1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS plus protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, USA) on ice. The whole cell proteins were isolated and concentration was measured using Bradford assay. Equal amounts of protein (50 and 100μg) were separated using 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBST at room temperature and incubated with anti-FOXO1 primary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-p-FOXO1 (Ser256) from (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA), anti-AKT1 (Imgenex, India), anti-p-AKT1 (Thr308) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) in 1% nonfat milk in TBST overnight at 4ºC. After the incubation, membranes were washed three times with TBST and incubated in secondary ALP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG (Bangalore Genie, India) in 1% nonfat milk in TBST. The membranes were developed with the NBT/BCIP solution (Amresco, USA) after washing. The membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-β-actin antibody (Pierce, USA) as a loading control. All the experiments were repeated thrice.

Immunofluorescent staining

Immunofluorescence was performed on cell lines grown on cover slips in standard culture condition. The cell lines were treated with different concentrations of LY294002 for 48hr. After treatment the cells were washed in 1x PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 1x PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were then permeabilized by incubating with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. After washing, the cells were incubated in blocking solution (1% BSA) for 30 min at RT. The cell lines were incubated with anti-p-AKT1 (Thr308) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), anti-human p-FOXO1 (Ser256) (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA) overnight at 4˚C. After washing, cells were incubated with Cy5 and FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies for 2hr at 4˚C, and nuclei were then counter-stained with DAPI (Sigma, USA). Cells were mounted with DABCO (Sigma, USA) mounting medium and visualized using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Cell proliferation, viability assay and analysis of apoptosis by flow cytometry

Cell proliferation was measured using the Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Millipore, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol in triplicate. Briefly, 10µl of WST-1/ECS solution was added to each well, the samples were incubated for 4hr at standard culture conditions and absorbance was measured at 450nm. Cell viability were counted by automated cell counter (TC-10 Biorad, USA) for treated and untreated cell lines by standard trypan blue exclusion method. For apoptosis assay cells were exposed to different concentrations of LY292002 for 48hr at standard culture conditions. For cell death assay, cells were harvested and washed twice in phosphate buffered saline and stained with AnnexinV-AlexaFlor488 and propidium iodide (Vibrant apoptosis detection kit, Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each sample was analyzed by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) (BD, San Jose, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data was expressed as mean ± SEM; for comparisons between more than 2 groups, ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests; and for comparisons between 2 groups, unpaired 2-tailed Student's t-test were applied using GraphPad Prism5 software (La Jolla, USA). The p-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Frequent down regulation of FOXO1 and up regulation of PI3K-AKT1 in cervical cancer cell lines and primary tumors

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR were performed for expression profiling of PIK3CA, AKT1 and FOXO1 in eight cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa, SiHa, ME-180, CaSki, C33A, MS751, C-4I and SW756), 70 primary tumor biopsy and 30 normal cervical tissue samples. Results show that FOXO1 is frequently down regulated (41%) (Fig. 1A) where as PIK3CA (25%) and AKT1 (45%) are frequently up regulated (Fig. 1B), in primary tumors and cell lines. The quantitative RT-PCR shows more than tenfold down regulation of FOXO1 (Fig. 1C). Similarly, our immunoblotting data also shows up regulation of AKT1 and down regulation of FOXO1 (Fig. 1D, 1E 1F and 1G). FOXO1 was significantly down regulated irrespective of the tumor stages: stages I/II (p=0.002) and III (p=0.009) (Fig. 1A). While p-AKT1 (Thr308) is up regulated in primary tumors and cell lines, p-FOXO1 (Ser256) is elevated in primary tumors (Fig. 1D, 1G) but undetectable in the cell lines (Fig. 1F). Moreover, while native AKT1 is detectable in all the cell lines, FOXO1 show very low expression in cell lines.
Figure 1

Expression profiles of the genes in normal, tumor biopsy samples and cell lines: (A) mRNA expression levels of FOXO1 in CC cell lines (n=8); and normal (n=30), primary tumor Stage I/II (n=23) and III (n=30) biopsy samples. (B) Expression profile of PIK3CA and AKT1 in eight CC cell lines and different primary tumors. (C) FOXO1 mRNA was measured in eight cell lines and primary tumor biopsy using qRT-PCR. All samples were normalized with β-actin expression (endogenous control). Note the down-regulation of FOXO1 compared to normal biopsy (Bars represent mean ± SEM; *p<0.05 vs control; ANOVA-test was employed). (D, E, F) Whole cell lysate of biopsy samples (CC), normal (N) and cell lines were used for western blot analysis by using full length anti-FOXO1, anti-AKT1 and anti-p-FOXO1 (Ser256), anti-p-AKT1 (Thr308) antibodies. (G) The band intensities were estimated by densitometry as the integrated density value (IDV) for each protein band and normalized by the IDV of β-actin. The anti-β-actin antibody was used as protein loading control. *P <0.05 was considered statistically significant (unpaired 2-tailed Student's t-test).

Loss of FOXO1 expression is not due to epigenetic silencing

To explain the mechanism of the down regulation of the FOXO1 expression, we checked its promoter methylation status. Our MSP results for all the three regions (Supplementary Material: Fig. S1) show that the promoter of FOXO1 is unmethylated in cell lines and primary tumors similar to the normal samples (Fig. 2A). Treatments with demethylating agent 5'-Aza-2-deoxycytidine (AZA) and/or HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) did not reactivate the FOXO1 expression (Fig. 2B), indicating that the inactivation of the FOXO1 is not due to promoter hypermethylation or histone acetylation.
Figure 2

Methylation pattern of the proximal promoter region and reactivation of FOXO1 in cervical cancer: (A) Methyl specific-PCR (MSP) analysis showing unmethylated proximal FOXO1 promoter (2kb of CpG island) including transcription start site (TSS) in normal (N), primary tumor biopsy (CC) and cell lines. Promoter hypermethylation/unmethylation was considered positive when present in at least one of the regions in two independent experiments. (B) 5'-Aza-2-deoxycytidine (AZA) and trichostatin A (TSA) treated HeLa, SiHa, ME-180 and SW756 cell lines. Note that the RT-PCR does not show reactivation of the FOXO1 expression.

Inhibition of PI3K activates FOXO1 and sequesters it to the nucleus

PI3K/AKT pathway has been shown to regulate the phosphorylation of FOXO proteins 30 leading to its functional inactivation and cytoplasmic sequestration. To determine whether the change of FOXO1 localization in CC cell lines was due to AKT1 activation, we used PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (LY25µM; 48hr) to suppress p-AKT1 (Thr308) activation. Immunofluorescence data show remarkably reduced level of p-AKT1 (Thr308) in ME-180 compared to untreated (Fig. 3A). The p-FOXO1 (Ser256) is localized in the cytoplasm in both untreated and 10μM LY294002 (LY10µM) treated SiHa and HeLa cell lines, whereas following 25μM LY294002 treated SiHa cells show reduced cytoplasmic p-FOXO1 (Fig. 3C). Morphological changes in nuclear architecture, like nuclear blebbing and chromatin condensation, characteristic feature of early apoptotic cells (Fig. 3C), was also observed. Treated HeLa cells (LY25µM; 48hr) show weak dispersed staining for p-FOXO1 protein throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 3B). However, the perinuclear and nuclear expression of p-FOXO1 (Ser256) were seen in ME-180 and SW756 (Fig. 3D, 3E) instead of cytoplasmic localization.
Figure 3

Fluorescence microscopy for the p-FOXO1 (Ser256) localization in LY294002 treated cervical cancer cell lines: (A) ME-180 cells were treated with PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (LY25μM) for 48hr. Immunofluorescence result show reduced cytoplasmic level (indicated by arrow head) of anti-p-AKT1 (Thr308). (B, C) p-FOXO1 (Ser256) localization in the cytoplasm (indicated by arrow head) in both SiHa and HeLa cell lines in untreated and treated cells with LY294002 (LY10μM) drug. LY294002 (LY25μM) treated SiHa cells show only nuclear localization of p-FOXO1 and also nuclear blebbing and chromatin condensation (indicated arrow head) in DAPI panel. HeLa cells show absence of cytoplasmic p-FOXO1 (indicated by arrow head) after LY294002 (LY25μM) treatment for 48hr. (D, E) Perinuclear and nuclear localization (indicated by arrow head) of p-FOXO1 (Ser256) in ME-180 and SW756 cells treated with LY294002 for 48hr.

Activation of FOXO1 attenuates cells proliferation and viability; and induces apoptosis in CC cell lines

It is well documented that inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway results in activation of FOXO1 and restores its transcriptional activity which acts as transcription factor for many genes involved in apoptotic pathway 31. We hypothesized that reactivation of FOXO1 should attenuate cell proliferation, viability and induce apoptosis in CC cell lines. Proliferation assay results show significant inhibition of cell proliferation (Fig. 4A). The Flow cytometry assay confirmed that the fraction of apoptotic cells was considerably higher and statistically significant in SiHa, HeLa and ME-180 than SW756 cells after 48hr of LY294002 treatment (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Material: Fig. S2). Loss of cell viability was much more pronounced in SiHa than HeLa, ME-180 and SW756 when exposed to LY294002 (25µM; 48hr) (Fig. 4C), indicating reactivation of FOXO1.
Figure 4

Activation of FOXO1 attenuates cell proliferation, viability and induces apoptosis in cell lines: (A) HeLa, SiHa, ME-180 and SW756 cells show the relative inhibition of cell proliferation (absorbance measured at 460nm) after the treatment with 10μM and 25μM of LY294002 or without LY294002 (untreated control) and DMSO (vehicle control) for 48hr. (B) Percentage of apoptotic cells after LY294002 treatment. (C) Percentage cell viability after LY294002 treatment. SiHa shows frequent loss of viable cells at both the concentrations (10μM and 25μM) than other three cell lines. Bars represent mean ± SEM: *p<0.05 vs. control.

Discussion

PI3K/AKT signaling pathway has been associated with cancer progression and has critical role in tumor development. FOXO1 is an important downstream effecter of this pathway; in the present study, we have attempted to investigate the consequences of the inhibition of PI3K with LY294002 on FOXO1 regulation and cellular endpoints. Frequent over expression of the PIK3CA and AKT1 in primary tumors and CC cell lines in our study is consistent with previously reported 3q26.3 amplification with increased copy number of PIK3CA 32 and over representation of AKT1 at 14q32.33 33 suggesting deregulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in cervical cancer. Interestingly, our data also show significant down regulation of FOXO1 expression in primary tumors and CC cell lines, similar to previous studies in non-small cell lung cancer 34; and endometroid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) and non-endometrioid cancers 35. Lack of promoter methylation of FOXO1 revealed by MSP in primary tumors and cell lines and inability of demethylating agent AZA and HDAC inhibitor TSA to reactivate FOXO1 expression in cell lines, suggest that methylation/acetylation may not be a cause for loss of FOXO1 expression in cervical cancer. The loss of FOXO1 expression may correlate with high turnover of mRNA transcript as previously shown 19 and miRNA mediated repression of FOXO1 expression as reported in endometrial and breast cancer cells 23, 36. In addition to miRNA, other mechanism(s) may contribute to loss of FOXO1 expression in cervical cancer. The western blot analyses, show down regulated expression of FOXO1 protein and undetectable p-FOXO1 (Ser256) level in CC cell lines. The presence of active p-AKT1 (Thr308) suggests post-translational modification/degradation of FOXO1 in CC cell lines. The previous reports of post-translational modification and proteasomal degradation in endometrial cancer 37 also support our data. Reduced cytoplasmic p-FOXO1 in cytoplasm indicating its nuclear translocation at 25µM of LY294002 treated SiHa and HeLa cells, where FOXO1 functions as a transcriptional activator for death genes 38, induces apoptosis (Fig. 3C). The perinuclear/nuclear expression of p-FOXO1 (Ser256) in ME-180 and SW756 cell lines, suggest that either some other proteins such as GSK may play important role in FOXO1 phosphorylation 39 or mutation in FOXO1 gene may prevent its cytoplasmic translocation. We further show that inhibition of PI3K by LY294002 decreases cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in cervical cancer cells similar to induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells 31 and in H23 lung adenocarcinoma cells 40 by resveratrol and LY294002 respectively. The significant inhibition of cell proliferation in HeLa, SiHa, ME-180 and SW756 may be due to the reduced phosphorylation of FOXO1. Statistically significant high number of apoptotic cells in SiHa, HeLa and ME-180 after 25µM of LY294002 treatment further suggests activation of FOXO1. Similarly, loss of cell viability on exposure to LY294002 supports the reduced cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis. Similar to apoptosis, more pronounced loss of cell viability in SiHa at 25µM of LY294002 further supports that inhibition of PI3K activates FOXO1 transcription factor. Based on our current knowledge and available data to date in the cervical cancer, this is the first report of down regulation of FOXO1 and its PI3K/AKT signaling pathway mediated post-translational regulation in cervical cancer. In conclusion, the frequent over expression of PIK3CA and AKT1 suggests deregulation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Down regulation of FOXO1 and lack of promoter methylation demonstrate that FOXO1 activity may be regulated by post-translational modification(s). Inhibition of PI3K induces activation of FOXO1 leading to cell proliferation arrest, induction of apoptosis and reduced cell viability in CC cell lines. Hence, PI3K/AKT pathway is critical in regulation of FOXO1 activity. Therefore, detailed understanding of the mechanism of PI3K/AKT/FOXO1 pathway regulation may contribute in identification of novel molecular therapeutic target(s) of cervical cancer. Figures S1-S2, Table S1. Click here for additional data file.
  40 in total

1.  Forkhead transcription factors are critical effectors of cell death and cell cycle arrest downstream of PTEN.

Authors:  N Nakamura; S Ramaswamy; F Vazquez; S Signoretti; M Loda; W R Sellers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Forkhead transcription factor FKHR-L1 modulates cytokine-dependent transcriptional regulation of p27(KIP1).

Authors:  P F Dijkers; R H Medema; C Pals; L Banerji; N S Thomas; E W Lam; B M Burgering; J A Raaijmakers; J W Lammers; L Koenderman; P J Coffer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase AKT pathway in human cancer.

Authors:  Igor Vivanco; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Protein kinase SGK mediates survival signals by phosphorylating the forkhead transcription factor FKHRL1 (FOXO3a).

Authors:  A Brunet; J Park; H Tran; L S Hu; B A Hemmings; M E Greenberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Gene dosage alterations revealed by cDNA microarray analysis in cervical cancer: identification of candidate amplified and overexpressed genes.

Authors:  Gopeshwar Narayan; Veronique Bourdon; Seeta Chaganti; Hugo Arias-Pulido; Subhadra V Nandula; Pulivarthi H Rao; Lutz Gissmann; Matthias Dürst; Achim Schneider; Bhavana Pothuri; Mahesh Mansukhani; Katia Basso; R S K Chaganti; Vundavalli V Murty
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Phosphorylation of the transcription factor forkhead family member FKHR by protein kinase B.

Authors:  G Rena; S Guo; S C Cichy; T G Unterman; P Cohen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Synergy between phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway and Bcl-xL in the control of apoptosis in adenocarcinoma cells of the lung.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Yong Zou; Jamshedur S M Rahman; Bo Lu; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  Promoter hypermethylation of FANCF: disruption of Fanconi Anemia-BRCA pathway in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Gopeshwar Narayan; Hugo Arias-Pulido; Subhadra V Nandula; Katia Basso; Dorcas D Sugirtharaj; Hernan Vargas; Mahesh Mansukhani; Jeannine Villella; Larissa Meyer; Achim Schneider; Lutz Gissmann; Matthias Dürst; Bhavana Pothuri; Vundavalli V V S Murty
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Resveratrol induces growth arrest and apoptosis through activation of FOXO transcription factors in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Qinghe Chen; Suthakar Ganapathy; Karan P Singh; Sharmila Shankar; Rakesh K Srivastava
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  FOXO transcription factors directly activate bim gene expression and promote apoptosis in sympathetic neurons.

Authors:  Jonathan Gilley; Paul J Coffer; Jonathan Ham
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  20 in total

1.  Advanced glycosylation end product promotes forkhead box O1 and inhibits Wnt pathway to suppress capacities of epidermal stem cells.

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Peng Wang; Zhimin Yu; Wei Lai; Yi Cao; Pinbo Huang; Qiaodong Xu; Menglei Yu; Junyao Xu; Zitong Huang; Bing Zeng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  PI3K/AKT pathway-mediated regulation of p27(Kip1) is associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shyam Babu Prasad; Suresh Singh Yadav; Mitali Das; Arusha Modi; Soni Kumari; Lakshmi Kant Pandey; Sunita Singh; Satyajit Pradhan; Gopeshwar Narayan
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 3.  FOXO transcription factors in cancer development and therapy.

Authors:  Alexandra Coomans de Brachène; Jean-Baptiste Demoulin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) and paired box gene 3 (PAX3) overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Doo Byung Chay; Gwan Hee Han; Sanghee Nam; Hanbyoul Cho; Joon-Yong Chung; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  α-Actinin-4 induces the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumorigenesis via regulation of Snail expression and β-catenin stabilization in cervical cancer.

Authors:  H-T An; S Yoo; J Ko
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Forkhead box O1 targeting replication factor C subunit 2 expression promotes glioma temozolomide resistance and survival.

Authors:  Xingsheng Qiu; Guifeng Tan; Hao Wen; Lian Lian; Songhua Xiao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 7.  Role of microRNAs in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Nima Hemmat; Ahad Mokhtarzadeh; Mohammad Aghazadeh; Farhad Jadidi-Niaragh; Behzad Baradaran; Hossein Bannazadeh Baghi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 8.  The Emerging Roles of Forkhead Box (FOX) Proteins in Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Wentao Zhang; Ning Duan; Tao Song; Zhong Li; Caiguo Zhang; Xun Chen
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  FOXO Signaling Pathways as Therapeutic Targets in Cancer.

Authors:  Mohd Farhan; Haitao Wang; Uma Gaur; Peter J Little; Jiangping Xu; Wenhua Zheng
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  Expression and phosphorylation of FOXO1 influences cell proliferation and apoptosis in the gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell line GIST-T1.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Hui Zhao; Hua Gao; Changming Zhu; Yao Xu; Liping Bai; Junbo Liu; Feng Yan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.