Ghassan B Hamra1, Jessie P Buckley1,2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, MD, USA. 2. Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW: This review provides a summary of statistical approaches that researchers can use to study environmental exposure mixtures. Two primary considerations are the form of the research question and the statistical tools best suited to address that question. Because the choice of statistical tools is not rigid, we make recommendations about when each tool may be most useful. RECENT FINDINGS: When dimensionality is relatively low, some statistical tools yield easily interpretable estimates of effect (e.g., risk ratio, odds ratio) or intervention impacts. When dimensionality increases, it is often necessary to compromise this interpretablity in favor of identifying interesting statistical signals from noise; this requires applying statistical tools that are oriented more heavily towards dimension reduction via shrinkage and/or variable selection. SUMMARY: The study of complex exposure mixtures has prompted development of novel statistical methods. We suggest that further validation work would aid practicing researchers in choosing among existing and emerging statistical tools for studying exposure mixtures.
PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW: This review provides a summary of statistical approaches that researchers can use to study environmental exposure mixtures. Two primary considerations are the form of the research question and the statistical tools best suited to address that question. Because the choice of statistical tools is not rigid, we make recommendations about when each tool may be most useful. RECENT FINDINGS: When dimensionality is relatively low, some statistical tools yield easily interpretable estimates of effect (e.g., risk ratio, odds ratio) or intervention impacts. When dimensionality increases, it is often necessary to compromise this interpretablity in favor of identifying interesting statistical signals from noise; this requires applying statistical tools that are oriented more heavily towards dimension reduction via shrinkage and/or variable selection. SUMMARY: The study of complex exposure mixtures has prompted development of novel statistical methods. We suggest that further validation work would aid practicing researchers in choosing among existing and emerging statistical tools for studying exposure mixtures.
Authors: Kelly Moore; Romain Neugebauer; Frederick Lurmann; Jane Hall; Victor Brajer; Sianna Alcorn; Ira Tager Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Richard F MacLehose; Andrew F Olshan; Amy H Herring; Margaret A Honein; Gary M Shaw; Paul A Romitti Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Mary S Wolff; Stephanie M Engel; Gertrud S Berkowitz; Xiaoyun Ye; Manori J Silva; Chenbo Zhu; James Wetmur; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ghassan B Hamra; Kristen Lyall; Gayle C Windham; Antonia M Calafat; Andreas Sjödin; Heather Volk; Lisa A Croen Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Rebecca M Lebeaux; Brett T Doherty; Lisa G Gallagher; R Thomas Zoeller; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Antonia M Calafat; Margaret R Karagas; Kimberly Yolton; Aimin Chen; Bruce P Lanphear; Joseph M Braun; Megan E Romano Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Michael S Bloom; Sarah Commodore; Pamela L Ferguson; Brian Neelon; John L Pearce; Anna Baumer; Roger B Newman; William Grobman; Alan Tita; James Roberts; Daniel Skupski; Kristy Palomares; Michael Nageotte; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Cuilin Zhang; Ronald Wapner; John E Vena; Kelly J Hunt Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-07-31 Impact factor: 6.498