Literature DB >> 21303803

Hierarchical latency models for dose-time-response associations.

David B Richardson1, Richard F MacLehose, Bryan Langholz, Stephen R Cole.   

Abstract

Exposure lagging and exposure-time window analysis are 2 widely used approaches to allow for induction and latency periods in analyses of exposure-disease associations. Exposure lagging implies a strong parametric assumption about the temporal evolution of the exposure-disease association. An exposure-time window analysis allows for a more flexible description of temporal variation in exposure effects but may result in unstable risk estimates that are sensitive to how windows are defined. The authors describe a hierarchical regression approach that combines time window analysis with a parametric latency model. They illustrate this approach using data from 2 occupational cohort studies: studies of lung cancer mortality among 1) asbestos textile workers and 2) uranium miners. For each cohort, an exposure-time window analysis was compared with a hierarchical regression analysis with shrinkage toward a simpler, second-stage parametric latency model. In each cohort analysis, there is substantial stability gained in time window-specific estimates of association by using a hierarchical regression approach. The proposed hierarchical regression model couples a time window analysis with a parametric latency model; this approach provides a way to stabilize risk estimates derived from a time window analysis and a way to reduce bias arising from misspecification of a parametric latency model.
© The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21303803      PMCID: PMC3105259          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  19 in total

1.  Analysis of exposure-time-response relationships using a spline weight function.

Authors:  M Hauptmann; J Wellmann; J H Lubin; P S Rosenberg; L Kreienbrock
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The exposure-time-response relationship between occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer in two German case-control studies.

Authors:  Michael Hauptmann; Hermann Pohlabeln; Jay H Lubin; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Wolfgang Ahrens; Irene Brüske-Hohlfeld; H -Erich Wichmann
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Using splines to analyse latency in the Colorado Plateau uranium miners cohort.

Authors:  M Hauptmann; K Berhane; B Langholz; J Lubin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat       Date:  2001

4.  Fitting general relative risk models for survival time and matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  Bryan Langholz; David B Richardson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Flexible modeling of the cumulative effects of time-dependent exposures on the hazard.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Sylvestre; Michal Abrahamowicz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1987

Review 7.  Models for exposure-time-response relationships with applications to cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  D C Thomas
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Induction and latent periods.

Authors:  K J Rothman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Quantitative risk assessment of lung cancer in U.S. uranium miners.

Authors:  R W Hornung; T J Meinhardt
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Multistage modelling of lung cancer mortality in asbestos textile workers.

Authors:  N Pearce
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  9 in total

1.  Model averaging in the analysis of leukemia mortality among Japanese A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Markov chain Monte Carlo: an introduction for epidemiologists.

Authors:  Ghassan Hamra; Richard MacLehose; David Richardson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Quantifying risk over the life course - latency, age-related susceptibility, and other time-varying exposure metrics.

Authors:  Molin Wang; Xiaomei Liao; Francine Laden; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Latency estimation for chronic disease risk: a damped exponential weighting model.

Authors:  Karin Michels; Mingyang Song; Walter C Willett; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Glucocorticoid prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L W Lietzen; T Ahern; P Christiansen; A B Jensen; H T Sørensen; T L Lash; D P Cronin-Fenton
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  On the proportional hazards model for occupational and environmental case-control analyses.

Authors:  Héloïse Gauvin; Aude Lacourt; Karen Leffondré
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  A Bayesian approach to investigate life course hypotheses involving continuous exposures.

Authors:  Sreenath Madathil; Lawrence Joseph; Rebecca Hardy; Marie-Claude Rousseau; Belinda Nicolau
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Environmental exposure mixtures: questions and methods to address them.

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; Jessie P Buckley
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-04-05

9.  A Multivariate Dynamic Spatial Factor Model for Speciated Pollutants and Adverse Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaufeld; Montse Fuentes; Brian J Reich; Amy H Herring; Gary M Shaw; Maria A Terres
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.