Brett T Doherty1, Jeremy P Koelmel2, Elizabeth Z Lin2, Megan E Romano1, Krystal J Godri Pollitt3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, Room 510, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. 3. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, Room 510, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. krystal.pollitt@yale.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The exposome is a recently coined concept that comprises the totality of nongenetic factors that affect human health. It is recognized as a major conceptual advancement in environmental epidemiology, and there is increased demand for technologies that capture the spatial, temporal, and chemical variability of exposures across individuals (i.e., "exposomic sensors"). We review a selection of these tools, highlighting their strengths and limitations with regard to epidemiological research. RECENT FINDINGS: Wearable passive samplers are emerging as promising exposomic sensors for individuals. In conjunction with targeted and untargeted assays, these sensors enable the measurement of complex multipollutant mixtures, which can include both known and previously unknown environmental contaminants. Because of their minimally burdensome and noninvasive nature, they are deployable among sensitive populations, such as seniors, pregnant women, and children. The integration of exposomic data captured by these sensors with other omic data (e.g., transcriptomic and metabolomic) presents exciting opportunities for investigating disease risk factors. For example, the linkage of exposomic sensor data with other omic data may indicate perturbation by multipollutant mixtures at multiple physiological levels, which would strengthen evidence of their effects and potentially indicate targets for interventions. However, there remain considerable theoretical and methodological challenges that must be overcome to realize the potential promise of omic integration. Through continued investment and improvement in exposomic sensor technologies, it may be possible to refine their application and reduce their outstanding limitations to advance the fields of exposure science and epidemiology.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The exposome is a recently coined concept that comprises the totality of nongenetic factors that affect human health. It is recognized as a major conceptual advancement in environmental epidemiology, and there is increased demand for technologies that capture the spatial, temporal, and chemical variability of exposures across individuals (i.e., "exposomic sensors"). We review a selection of these tools, highlighting their strengths and limitations with regard to epidemiological research. RECENT FINDINGS: Wearable passive samplers are emerging as promising exposomic sensors for individuals. In conjunction with targeted and untargeted assays, these sensors enable the measurement of complex multipollutant mixtures, which can include both known and previously unknown environmental contaminants. Because of their minimally burdensome and noninvasive nature, they are deployable among sensitive populations, such as seniors, pregnant women, and children. The integration of exposomic data captured by these sensors with other omic data (e.g., transcriptomic and metabolomic) presents exciting opportunities for investigating disease risk factors. For example, the linkage of exposomic sensor data with other omic data may indicate perturbation by multipollutant mixtures at multiple physiological levels, which would strengthen evidence of their effects and potentially indicate targets for interventions. However, there remain considerable theoretical and methodological challenges that must be overcome to realize the potential promise of omic integration. Through continued investment and improvement in exposomic sensor technologies, it may be possible to refine their application and reduce their outstanding limitations to advance the fields of exposure science and epidemiology.
Authors: Peter C Tromp; Henry Beeltje; Joseph O Okeme; Roel Vermeulen; Anjoeka Pronk; Miriam L Diamond Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Stephanie C Hammel; Kate Hoffman; Thomas F Webster; Kim A Anderson; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Joseph O Okeme; Congqiao Yang; Atousa Abdollahi; Suman Dhal; Shelley A Harris; Liisa M Jantunen; Dina Tsirlin; Miriam L Diamond Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Carey E Donald; Richard P Scott; Kathy L Blaustein; Mary L Halbleib; Makhfousse Sarr; Paul C Jepson; Kim A Anderson Journal: R Soc Open Sci Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.963
Authors: Kim A Anderson; Gary L Points; Carey E Donald; Holly M Dixon; Richard P Scott; Glenn Wilson; Lane G Tidwell; Peter D Hoffman; Julie B Herbstman; Steven G O'Connell Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: P Vineis; M Chadeau-Hyam; H Gmuender; J Gulliver; Z Herceg; J Kleinjans; M Kogevinas; S Kyrtopoulos; M Nieuwenhuijsen; D H Phillips; N Probst-Hensch; A Scalbert; R Vermeulen; C P Wild Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Kate Hoffman; Jessica L Levasseur; Sharon Zhang; Duncan Hay; Nicholas J Herkert; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Sci Technol Lett Date: 2021-08-24
Authors: Pei Zhang; Christopher Carlsten; Romanas Chaleckis; Kati Hanhineva; Mengna Huang; Tomohiko Isobe; Ville M Koistinen; Isabel Meister; Stefano Papazian; Kalliroi Sdougkou; Hongyu Xie; Jonathan W Martin; Stephen M Rappaport; Hiroshi Tsugawa; Douglas I Walker; Tracey J Woodruff; Robert O Wright; Craig E Wheelock Journal: Environ Sci Technol Lett Date: 2021-09-07
Authors: Anjoeka Pronk; Miranda Loh; Eelco Kuijpers; Maria Albin; Jenny Selander; Lode Godderis; Manosij Ghosh; Roel Vermeulen; Susan Peters; Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum; Michelle C Turner; Vivi Schlünssen; Marcel Goldberg; Manolis Kogevinas; Barbara N Harding; Svetlana Solovieva; Tina Garani-Papadatos; Martie van Tongeren; Rob Stierum Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2022-02-17