Literature DB >> 30636062

Patients' perspectives of variants of uncertain significance and strategies for uncertainty management.

Sukh Makhnoon1, Brian H Shirts2, Deborah J Bowen3.   

Abstract

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a well-recognized source of uncertainty in genomic medicine. Despite the existence of straightforward clinical management recommendations, patients report feeling anxiety, worry, and uncertainty in response to VUS. We report the first structured analysis of patient perspectives of VUS-related uncertainty in genome sequencing using Han's taxonomy of genomic uncertainty. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 11 patients to elicit their thoughts regarding implications of the result for themselves and their family members. Patients' primary concern with VUS-related uncertainty involved personal and practical issues as they directly inform health-care decisions. Patients demonstrated good understanding of the epistemic nature of VUS uncertainty-that information about such variant is currently unknown. However, between-provider discordance in explanations of the implication of this uncertainty for patients' diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy was a major contributor to the overall experience of uncertainty. Strategies for uncertainty reduction involved periodically checking back for reclassification and receiving concordant and clear recommendation from providers. Other proactive strategies of uncertainty reduction-such as information seeking and reading the genetic test report-were not helpful. Collectively, these findings offer previously unreported insight into uncertainty management strategies used by patients which have the potential to guide clinical management practices.
© 2019 National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VUS; management; tolerance; uncertainty; variants of uncertain significance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30636062     DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  17 in total

Review 1.  Patients' views on variants of uncertain significance across indications.

Authors:  Kristin Clift; Sarah Macklin; Colin Halverson; Jennifer B McCormick; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Stephanie Hines
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-08-20

2.  Implementation matters: How patient experiences differ when genetic counseling accompanies the return of genetic variants of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Harsh V Patel; Nora B Henrikson; James D Ralston; Kathleen Leppig; Aaron Scrol; Gail P Jarvik; Shannon DeVange; Eric B Larson; Andrea L Hartzler
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 3.  Experiences of individuals with a variant of uncertain significance on genetic testing for hereditary cancer risks: a mixed method systematic review.

Authors:  Danielle Gould; Rachel Walker; Grace Makari-Judson; Memnun Seven
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-07-12

4.  Minigene Splicing Assays Identify 20 Spliceogenic Variants of the Breast/Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Gene RAD51C.

Authors:  Lara Sanoguera-Miralles; Elena Bueno-Martínez; Alberto Valenzuela-Palomo; Ada Esteban-Sánchez; Inés Llinares-Burguet; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Alicia García-Álvarez; Miguel de la Hoya; Eladio A Velasco-Sampedro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Closing the gap: Systematic integration of multiplexed functional data resolves variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1, TP53, and PTEN.

Authors:  Shawn Fayer; Carrie Horton; Jennifer N Dines; Alan F Rubin; Marcy E Richardson; Kelly McGoldrick; Felicia Hernandez; Tina Pesaran; Rachid Karam; Brian H Shirts; Douglas M Fowler; Lea M Starita
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 11.043

Review 6.  Genetic Testing: Consent and Result Disclosure for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  W Andrew Faucett; Holly Peay; Curtis R Coughlin
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  "I wish that there was more info": characterizing the uncertainty experienced by carriers of pathogenic ATM and/or CHEK2 variants.

Authors:  Kathryn G Reyes; Cheyla Clark; Meredith Gerhart; Ainsley J Newson; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing.

Authors:  Katherine E Donohue; Siobhan M Dolan; Dana Watnick; Katie M Gallagher; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Nehama Teitelman; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-01-29

9.  Perceptions of provider's epistemic authority in response to variant of uncertain significance-related recommendations.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Maureen Mork; Banu Arun; Robert J Volk; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast/Ovarian Cancer: Mysterious Signals From the Genome.

Authors:  Daniele Fanale; Alessia Fiorino; Lorena Incorvaia; Alessandra Dimino; Clarissa Filorizzo; Marco Bono; Daniela Cancelliere; Valentina Calò; Chiara Brando; Lidia Rita Corsini; Roberta Sciacchitano; Luigi Magrin; Alessia Pivetti; Erika Pedone; Giorgio Madonia; Alessandra Cucinella; Giuseppe Badalamenti; Antonio Russo; Viviana Bazan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.