Literature DB >> 34817051

In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Hema J Sulkar1, Tyler W Knighton2, Linda Amoafo3, Klevis Aliaj1, Christopher W Kolz1, Yue Zhang3, Tucker Hermans4, Heath B Henninger5.   

Abstract

In vitro simulation of three-dimensional (3D) shoulder motion using in vivo kinematics obtained from human subjects allows investigation of clinical conditions in the context of physiologically relevant biomechanics. Herein, we present a framework for laboratory simulation of subject-specific kinematics that combines individual 3D scapular and humeral control in cadavers. The objectives were to: (1) robotically simulate seven healthy subject-specific 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematic trajectories in six cadavers, (2) characterize system performance using kinematic orientation accuracy and repeatability, and muscle force repeatability metrics, and (3) analyze effects of input kinematics and cadaver specimen variability. Using an industrial robot to orient the scapula range of motion (ROM), errors with repeatability of ±0.1 mm and <0.5 deg were achieved. Using a custom robot and a trajectory prediction algorithm to orient the humerus relative to the scapula, orientation accuracy for glenohumeral elevation, plane of elevation, and axial rotation of <3 deg mean absolute error (MAE) was achieved. Kinematic accuracy was not affected by varying input kinematics or cadaver specimens. Muscle forces over five repeated setups showed variability typically <33% relative to the overall simulations. Varying cadaver specimens and subject-specific human motions showed effects on muscle forces, illustrating that the system was capable of differentiating changes in forces due to input conditions. The anterior and middle deltoid, specifically, showed notable variations in patterns across the ROM that were affected by subject-specific motion. This machine provides a platform for future laboratory studies to investigate shoulder biomechanics and consider the impacts of variable input kinematics from populations of interest, as they can significantly impact study outputs and resultant conclusions.
Copyright © 2022 by ASME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34817051      PMCID: PMC8822462          DOI: 10.1115/1.4053099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  71 in total

1.  Reliability of the glenoid plane.

Authors:  Lieven F De Wilde; T Verstraeten; W Speeckaert; A Karelse
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Comparison of scapular upward rotation during arm elevation in the scapular plane in healthy volunteers and patients with rotator cuff tears pre- and post-surgery.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Ueda; Hiroshi Tanaka; Shigetoshi Morioka; Takashi Tachibana; Toyohiko Hayashi; Noriaki Ichihashi; Hiroaki Inui; Katsuya Nobuhara
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  The influence of rotator cuff tears on muscle and joint-contact loading after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Dale L Robinson; Adam Wilkosz; Wen Wu; Martin Richardson; Peter Lee; Kwong Ming Tse
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  The rotator cuff muscles are antagonists after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joshua W Giles; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Biomechanics of tensor fascia lata allograft for superior capsular reconstruction.

Authors:  Zachary D Vredenburgh; John P Prodromo; James E Tibone; Taylor R Dunphy; Joel Weber; Michelle H McGarry; Seungbum Chae; Gregory J Adamson; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  A new dynamic testing apparatus to study glenohumeral joint motion.

Authors:  R E Debski; P J McMahon; W O Thompson; S L Woo; J J Warner; F H Fu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Anatomy and biomechanics of the shoulder.

Authors:  N E Pratt
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

8.  Muscle and Joint Function After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Modular Shoulder Prosthesis.

Authors:  David C Ackland; Wen Wu; Richard Thomas; Minoo Patel; Richard Page; Morgan Sangeux; Martin Richardson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Influence of Radiographic Viewing Perspective on Glenoid Inclination Measurement.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Thomas Suter; Matthijs Jacxsens; Yue Zhang; Chong Zhang; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-06-06

10.  A survey of human shoulder functional kinematic representations.

Authors:  Rakesh Krishnan; Niclas Björsell; Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik; Christian Smith
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  1 in total

1.  Anatomic total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tyler W Knighton; Peter N Chalmers; Hema J Sulkar; Klevis Aliaj; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.507

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.