Literature DB >> 3062549

Fluctuations in accommodation: a review.

W N Charman1, G Heron.   

Abstract

When a young observer attempts to accommodate steadily on a fixed stimulus, the nominally steady-state response shows small instabilities or fluctuations (sometimes termed microfluctuations or oscillations). These fluctuations typically have an amplitude of a few tenths of a dioptre and a frequency spectrum extending up to a few Hertz. The properties of these fluctuations are described for various viewing conditions: pupil diameter, target vergence, target form, target contrast, and target luminance all influence the frequency spectra of the oscillations, as may anomalies of vision such as amblyopia. The possible roles that the fluctuations might play in the function of the accommodative system are discussed. It is suggested that the higher frequency components around 2 Hz may arise from the mechanical and elastic characteristics of the lens, zonule and ciliary body. Components at lower frequencies (less than 0.5 Hz) may be of more significance in the function of the accommodative control system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3062549     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01031.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  63 in total

1.  Can tonic accommodation predict surgical performance?

Authors:  J Shah; I Paul; D Buckley; H Davis; J P Frisby; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is there any difference in using blur as a stimulus for accommodation between emmetropes and myopes?

Authors:  Ai Hong Chen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Role of latency jittering correction in motion-onset VEP amplitude decay during prolonged visual stimulation.

Authors:  J Kremláček; M Hulan; M Kuba; Z Kubová; J Langrová; F Vít; J Szanyi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Fluctuations in intraocular pressure and the potential effect on aberrations of the eye.

Authors:  M Asejczyk-Widlicka; B K Pierscionek
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Human infants' accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Grazyna M Tondel; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Katja Krüger; Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.