Literature DB >> 12152800

Is there any difference in using blur as a stimulus for accommodation between emmetropes and myopes?

Ai Hong Chen1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if there was any difference between myopes and emmetropes in using blur as a stimulus for accommodation when the chromatic aberration, size and proximal cues were eliminated. Twenty adults (10 myopes and 10 emmetropes) were examined for their accuracy of accommodation response for five different accommodation demands (OD, 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D) under two different light sources: achromatized white light versus monochromatic light. There was no significant difference in using blur stimulus between myopes and emmetropes when the chromatic aberration, size and proximal cues were eliminated.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12152800     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015781400136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Accommodation to static chromatic simulations of blurred retinal images.

Authors:  J H Lee; L R Stark; S Cohen; P B Kruger
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Current perspective on microfluctuations of accommodation.

Authors:  B Winn; B Gilmartin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Free-space accommodative response and minus lens-induced accommodative response in pre-school children.

Authors:  A H Chen; D J O'Leary
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2000-07

4.  Blur: a sufficient accommodative stimulus.

Authors:  S Phillips; L Stark
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-04-29       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient.

Authors:  N A McBrien; M Millodot
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Dioptric and non-dioptric stimuli for accommodation: target size alone and with blur and chromatic aberration.

Authors:  P B Kruger; J Pola
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Accommodative response to blur.

Authors:  L M Smithline
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1974-11

8.  Frequency analysis of accommodation, accommodative vergence and disparity vergence.

Authors:  V V Krishnan; S Phillips; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Is accommodation colorblind? Focusing chromatic contours.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; D A Owens
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Accommodative tracking: a trial-and-error function.

Authors:  A Troelstra; B L Zuber; D Miller; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.