Literature DB >> 22431242

Role of latency jittering correction in motion-onset VEP amplitude decay during prolonged visual stimulation.

J Kremláček1, M Hulan, M Kuba, Z Kubová, J Langrová, F Vít, J Szanyi.   

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials to motion-onset stimulation (M-VEPs) gradually attenuate in amplitude during examination. The observed decline in averaged responses can be caused by decreases in single response magnitudes and/or increased variability in a response delays, that is, latency jittering. To illuminate the origins of the suppression of M-VEPs during stimuli repetition, we used correlation technique to estimate an upper bound of possible latency jittering of single sweeps and we evaluated the effect of its correction on the amplitudes of three M-VEP dominant peaks P1, N2 and P3. During prolonged visual motion stimulation, the variability of corrective latency shifts in the occipital region increased (r = 0.35: 0.44) and the number of single responses corresponding to the average curve declined in occipital and parietal derivations (r = -0.48: -0.62). While the P1 peak amplitude did not exhibit any time-specific behaviour, the N2 amplitude exhibited a significant decay of 29.4% that was partially reduced to 16.6% in the central occipital derivation by the latency jitter and non-correspondence corrections. The strongest attenuation (32.7%) was observed in the P3 amplitude and was less sensitive to the corrections, dropping only to 27.9%. The main part of the response suppression to repeated motion stimulation was caused by amplitude drop and represents non-stationary process that likely correspond to a fatigue model. The rise of variability in latency jitter correction and the reduction in single responses correlated with the M-VEP were significant factors associated with prolonged motion stimulation. The relation of these parameters to a hypothetical veridical response is ambiguous and can be caused by a time shift of the response or by a change of signal-to-noise ratio. Using selective averaging and latency jitter correction, the effect of response suppression was partially removed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22431242     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-012-9321-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria.

Authors:  T W Picton; S Bentin; P Berg; E Donchin; S A Hillyard; R Johnson; G A Miller; W Ritter; D S Ruchkin; M D Rugg; M J Taylor
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Global brain dynamics of transient visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  J Kremlácek; M Kuba
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.881

3.  The influence of defocus on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Christina Pieh; Michael B Hoffmann; Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Motion-onset VEPs: characteristics, methods, and diagnostic use.

Authors:  M Kuba; Z Kubová; J Kremlácek; J Langrová
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Evaluation of a technique to measure latency jitter in event-related potentials.

Authors:  A Roger D Thornton
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 7.  Fluctuations in accommodation: a review.

Authors:  W N Charman; G Heron
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Averaging, selective averaging and latency-corrected averaging.

Authors:  J Peregrin; M Valach
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 9.  Habituation: a history.

Authors:  Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  The function of bursts of spikes during visual fixation in the awake primate lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Susana Martinez-Conde; Stephen L Macknik; David H Hubel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Waveform variance and latency jitter of the visual evoked potential in childhood.

Authors:  John P Kelly; Felix Darvas; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter.

Authors:  John P Kelly; James O Phillips; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The relationship of nystagmus waveform on the VEP response in infantile nystagmus syndrome: a small case series.

Authors:  John P Kelly; James O Phillips; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.