| Literature DB >> 30622597 |
Carmen Mannucci1, Fabrizio Calapai1, Luigi Cardia2, Giuseppina Inferrera3, Giovanni D'Arena4, Martina Di Pietro1, Michele Navarra5, Sebastiano Gangemi6, Elvira Ventura Spagnolo7, Gioacchino Calapai1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to analyze preclinical and clinical studies investigating the anxiety effects of Citrus aurantium or Citrus sinensis essential oils (EOs).Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30622597 PMCID: PMC6304613 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3624094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1PRISMA flowchart showing the process of literature search and studies selection.
Principal characteristics of pre-clinical studies carried out with Citrus aurantium or Citrus sinensis essential oil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Carvalho and Costa, 2002 |
| Gavage oral administration | Male Swiss mice | Pentobarbital Sleeping Time (induced by sodium pentobarbital 40 mg/kg, i.p.) | Animals were orally treated with |
|
| Leite et al., 2010 |
| Inhalation | Male Wistar rats | Open-field behavioral test |
|
| |
| Costa et al., 2013 |
| Gavage oral administration | Male Swiss mice | Light/Dark Box Test |
|
| |
| Pultrini et al., 2006 |
| Gavage oral administration | Male Swiss mice | Light–dark box test | Citrus aurantium essential oil 0.5 or 1.0 g/kg in a volume of 10 ml/kg. | In light–dark box test, single treatment with essential oil (0.5 or 1.0 g/kg) increased the time spent by mice in the light chamber and the number of transitions between the two compartments. | |
| Khosravi et al., 2014 |
| Intraperitoneal injection | Male albino mice | Elevated plus-maze test (EPM) | Intraperitoneal injection of | In groups receiving | |
| Saketi et al., 2014 |
| Intraperitoneal injection | Male albino mice | Elevated plus maze test |
| Injection of | |
|
| |||||||
|
| Faturi et al., 2010 |
| Inhalation | Male Wistar rats | Elevated plus-maze |
| All doses of |
|
| |||||||
|
| Wolffenbüttel et al., 2018 |
| Inhalation | Male adult albino mice | Light– dark test | 10% (v/v | Behavioral tests showed that |
Principal characteristics of clinical studies carried out with Citrus aurantium essential oil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernandes Pimenta, et al., 2016 | Anxiety in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) | Randomized controlled study | N = 42 of both sexes. | Participants were randomly divided into three groups. | The evaluation was performed through psychometric scales STAI-S [State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)] and physiological measurements (blood pressure and cardiac and respiratory frequency). | Not reported. | Inhalation of |
|
| |||||||
| Pei-Hsin et al., 2010 | Anxiety, stress and physiological parameters in patients subjected to colonoscopy | Randomized controlled trial. | N = 27 subjects: | Aromatherapy | The anxiety index | Not reported | There was no |
|
| |||||||
| Akhlaghi et al., 2011 | Anxiety in ASA | Randomized controlled double-blind study | 60 outpatients, scheduled for elective minor surgery | Participants were divided into two groups of 30 receiving oral | Preoperative anxiety | Not observed. | Patients treated with CABd were significantly less anxious than patients of placebo group (p < 0.05). |
|
| |||||||
| Hasheminia et al., 2014 | Moderate and high anxiety before and during surgical removal of an impacted | Randomized controlled clinical trial. | N = 56; | Patients were divided into two groups: fragrance group (19 males, 9 females), control group | The dental anxiety scale (DAS) questionnaire was used to determine the anxiety level of the patients prior to surgery | Not reported | Orange fragrance is effective in reducing anxiety linked to surgical |
|
| |||||||
| Namazi et al., 2014 | Anxiety during labor in primiparous pregnant women. | Randomized controlled trial | 126 primiparous women divided into two groups: aromatherapy (n = 63) and control (n = 63). | 100 mL of the distillate contained 8 mL | Intensity of anxiety was measured at baseline and after the intervention at dilations of 3-4 and 6-8 cm. Data were collected using a demographic and obstetric questionnaire, an examination and observation checklist including vital signs, vaginal examination, uterine contractions, and fetal heart rate, and Spielberger state-trait anxiety questionnaire. | Not observed | The levels of anxiety at dilations of 3-4 and 6-8 cm were significantly lower in the aromatherapy group compared with the control group. |
|
| |||||||
| Chaves Neto et al., 2017 | Anxiolytic effect of | Randomized controlled clinical trial. | 51 volunteers, |
| The Simulated Public Speaking (SPS) method was used. Physiological measures were assessed at specific phases during the experiment. | Not reported | Nebulization of C |
Principal characteristics of clinical studies carried out with Citrus sinensis essential oil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lehrner et al., 2000. | Anxiety in patients waiting for dental treatment. | Randomized controlled study | Total number of 72 patients; | Participants were divided into two groups: | To assess cognitive function, the Wortschatz test (WST) was used. | Not reported. | Relaxant effect of ambient orange odor exposure. |
|
| |||||||
| Jaafarzadeh et al., 2017 | Child anxiety during dental treatment. | Randomized, controlled, blinded, crossover, clinical trial. | 30 children (10 boys, 20 girls). | Patients were randomly assigned into two groups according to crossover design. | Anxiety of children was assessed with salivary cortisol level and pulse rate before and on completion of each of two dental treatment appointments. | Not reported | Statistically significant reduction of salivary cortisol level and pulse rate in aromatherapy group compared to control group. |
|
| |||||||
| Costa Goes et al., 2012. | Healthy volunteers submitted to an anxiogenic situation. | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical | 40 males healthy graduate student volunteers. | The video-monitored Stroop Color-Word Test was used to elicit anxiety | Psychologic parameters: STAI, Visual Analogue Mood Scale. | Not reported | Individuals exposed to the test aroma (2.5 and 10 drops) presented a lack of significant alterations (p> 0.05) in state-anxiety, subjective tension and tranquillity levels throughout the |
Section 4 of elaborations of CONSORT items for trials with herbal medicine interventions applied to clinical studies with Citrus aurantium herbal preparations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latin name | Brand name | Dose | Duration of use | |||||
| Chaves Neto et al., 2017 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| ||||||||
| Fernandes Pimenta et al., 2016 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| ||||||||
| Namazi et al., 2014 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
|
| ||||||||
| Hu et al., 2010 | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
|
| ||||||||
| Hasheminia et al., 2014 | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
|
| ||||||||
| Akhlaghi et al., 2011 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Section 4 of elaborations of CONSORT items for trials with herbal medicine interventions applied to clinical studies with Citrussinensis herbal preparations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latin name | Brand name | Dose | Duration of use | |||||
| Jaafarzadeh et al., 2017 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| ||||||||
| Costa Goes et al., 2012 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| ||||||||
| Lehrner et al., 2000 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Clinical trials quality assessment according to Jadad score.
| | Authors | Was the trial | Was the | Was the trial | Was the method | Was the | Jadad Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Fernandes Pimenta et al., 2016 | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | 2 |
| Chaves Neto et al., 2017 | Yes | No | No | No | No | 1 | |
| Namazi et al., 2014 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 3 | |
| Pei-Hsin et al., 2010 | Yes | No | No | No | No | 0 | |
| Hasheminia et al., 2014 | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | 2 | |
| Akhlaghi et al., 2011 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5 | |
|
| |||||||
|
| Lehrner et al., 2000 | Yes | No | No | No | No | 0 |
| Jaafarzadeh et al., 2017 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 3 | |
| Costa Goes et al., 2012 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 3 | |
The JADAD scoring system was used for the assessment of randomized controlled trials with the following 5 items:
Was the study described as randomized? (Yes = 1 point, No = 0 points);
Was the randomization scheme described and appropriate? (Yes = 1 point, No = -1 point);
Was the study described as double-blind? (Yes = 1 point, No = 0 points);
Was the method of double blinding appropriate? (Yes = 1 point, No = -1 point. If the answer of Item 3 was No, Item 4 is not calculable);
Was there a description of dropouts and withdrawals? (Yes = 1 point, No = 0 points).