Literature DB >> 30619669

Feasibility of Full Percutaneous Segmental Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine With a Combination of an Expandable Interbody Cage and an Interspinous Spacer: Preliminary Results.

Rudolf Morgenstern1, Christian Morgenstern1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the feasibility of a full percutaneous approach with an expandable interbody cage and an interspinous spacer for a segmental stabilization of the anterior and posterior columns of the lumbar spine, respectively, with local anesthesia.
METHODS: Patients were prospectively included between 2012 and 2018 in this single-center, feasibility case series. An expandable interbody cage was inserted with endoscopy-based, facet-sparing percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (pTLIF). An interspinous spacer was percutaneously placed through the same skin incision. Pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) outcomes at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were obtained and evaluated with the Student t test. Postoperative outcome was classified according to modified Macnab criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were included, presenting mean preoperative scores for VAS back of 6.9 ± 2.5, VAS leg 7.9 ± 1.2, and ODI 30.1 ± 4.5. Postoperative mean scores for VAS back of 1.9 ± 2.1, VAS leg 2.1 ± 3.4, and ODI 14.8 ± 13.0 significantly (P < .001) decreased with a mean follow-up of 18.1 ± 16.6 months (range 1-65.2). Postoperative outcome was excellent and good for 13 (81%) cases, fair for 2 (13%), and poor for 1 (6%) case with a preoperative spondylolisthesis, which required revision surgery due to persisting instability. Postoperative complications included 3 cases with transitory, ipsilateral dysesthesia and 2 cases with radiologic cage subsidence but no clinical symptoms. Median postoperative time until hospital discharge was 16 hours.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results for this full percutaneous technique show a similar outcome compared to conventional surgery with a fast patient recovery and early postoperative hospital discharge, opening the way to instrumented, outpatient surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expandable interbody cage; interspinous spacer; percutaneous surgery; percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Year:  2018        PMID: 30619669      PMCID: PMC6314344          DOI: 10.14444/5083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  15 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Isaac O Karikari; Robert E Isaacs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Placement of percutaneous pedicle screws without imaging guidance.

Authors:  Ciaran J Powers; Vinod K Podichetty; Robert E Isaacs
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Fan Shunwu; Zhao Xing; Zhao Fengdong; Fang Xiangqian
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Usefulness of an expandable interbody spacer for the treatment of foraminal stenosis in extremely collapsed disks: preliminary clinical experience with endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal approach.

Authors:  Rudolf Morgenstern; Christian Morgenstern; Raimon Jané; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-12

6.  Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Byungjoo Jung; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Mini-open or percutaneous bilateral lumbar transfacet pedicle screw fixation: a technical note.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Jason Seale; Vanessa Cumming
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-03

8.  Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Sebastian Ruetten; Martin Komp; Harry Merk; Georgios Godolias
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.

Authors:  Reginald Davis; Joshua D Auerbach; Hyun Bae; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-05-31

10.  The learning curve in foraminal endoscopic discectomy: experience needed to achieve a 90% success rate.

Authors:  Rudolf Morgenstern; Christian Morgenstern; Anthony T Yeung
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-08-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Lisa Ferrara; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.