Literature DB >> 30617496

Role of one-pass breast lesion excision system in complete excision of high-risk breast lesions with atypia expressed as clusters of microcalcifications.

Alexandra Christou1, Vassilis Koutoulidis2, Dimitra Koulocheri3, Evangelia Panourgias4, Afrodite Nonni5, Constantinos G Zografos6, George C Zografos7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the role of the breast lesion excision system (BLES) in complete removal of clusters of microcalcifications found on mammogram proved histologically to be high-risk lesions with cell atypia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three hundred ninety-four consecutive women (mean age 58.5 years, range 39-78 years) with 400 clusters of suspicious microcalcifications underwent stereotactic biopsy using the intact BLES device between January 2014 and January 2016. All cases proved histologically to be high-risk lesions were subsequently assessed for complete removal. The underestimation rate was also assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight out of 400 (9.5%) lesions were high-risk lesions with atypia with mean size 7.63 mm (st. dev. = 4.03 mm) which was within the size that the BLES needle can excise (20 mm). Four (10.5%) papillomas with atypia, 14 (36.8%) cases with flat epithelial atypia (FEA), 10 (26.3%) cases with lobular intraepithelial neoplasia (LIN-LIN 1, LIN 2), 8 (21.2%) with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and 2 (5.3%) cases with mucocele-like lesions (MLL) with atypia were found. Twenty-nine out of 38 lesions had subsequent surgery. Complete excision was achieved in 23/29 lesions (79.3%). No underestimation was found. Two-year mammographic stability was found in all lesions. Non-parametric statistical analysis showed no other significant predictive factor for complete excision apart from the distance of the lesions from the specimen margins (p = 0.031 Mann-Whitney test).
CONCLUSION: One-pass BLES intact biopsy technique is a safe method of complete removal of high-risk atypical lesions with high accuracy rates for certain histologies and could be potentially used as an alternative excision method to diagnostic surgery in selected cases. KEY POINTS: • Breast lesion excision system (BLES) is an image-guided biopsy technique that uses radiofrequency to remove an intact piece of tissue including the target breast neoplasm. • Breast lesion excision system (BLES) under stereotactic guidance is able to accurately biopsy high-risk breast lesions expressed mammographically as clusters of suspicious microcalcifications. • BLES under stereotactic guidance is an accurate technique for en bloc excision of selected cases of small clusters of suspicious microcalcifications proved to be high-risk lesions with histopathologically disease-free margins of excision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Image-guided biopsy; Margins of excision

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30617496     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5925-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  D L Page; L W Rogers
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Mucocelelike lesions of the breast: mammographic findings with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  A Jill Leibman; Christine N Staeger; Douglas A Charney
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto; Ian Ellis; Daniela Ambrogetti
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Multicenter evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted, intact-specimen breast biopsy device.

Authors:  Angela Sie; David C Bryan; Victor Gaines; Larry K Killebrew; Christine H Kim; Carrie C Morrison; William R Poller; Ada P Romilly; Kathy Schilling; Janet H Sung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.

Authors:  M L Darling; D N Smith; S C Lester; C Kaelin; D L Selland; C M Denison; P J DiPiro; D I Rose; E Rhei; J E Meyer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  A comparison of the accuracy of two minimally invasive breast biopsy methods: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kyle Fahrbach; Isabella Sledge; Catherine Cella; Heather Linz; Susan D Ross
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience.

Authors:  Larry K Killebrew; Ruth H Oneson
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 8.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document.

Authors:  N Perry; M Broeders; C de Wolf; S Törnberg; R Holland; L von Karsa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions.

Authors:  Steven Pandelidis; David Heiland; David Jones; Kelly Stough; Joanne Trapeni; Yasir Suliman; D Heilman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease.

Authors:  D L Page; T E Kidd; W D Dupont; J F Simpson; L W Rogers
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.