Literature DB >> 16848839

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience.

Larry K Killebrew1, Ruth H Oneson.   

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine whether biopsy of the breast using a percutaneous intact specimen sampling device influences the underestimation rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared to a vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy (VACNB) device. This study was a retrospective comparison of two series of 800 consecutive patients that underwent stereotactic biopsy of the breast for mammographic lesions presenting as microcalcifications classified by our institution as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5. In the first series of patients (n = 800), a VACNB device was used; in the second series (n = 800), a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen biopsy (VAPIB) device was used. Initial diagnoses were made from the histopathologic examination of the tissue retrieved at biopsy. Lesions presenting as DCIS or atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) after percutaneous biopsy were then compared to the histopathologic analysis of specimens retrieved at surgical biopsy. DCIS upgrades were defined as cases in which the diagnosis of the stereotactic biopsy was DCIS and the diagnosis of the subsequent surgical excision was infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). ADH upgrades were defined as cases in which the diagnosis of the stereotactic biopsy specimen was ADH and the diagnosis of the surgical excision was DCIS, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), or IDC. The lesions retrieved by both biopsy techniques yielded a similar pathology distribution. Underestimation of DCIS occurred less frequently (p = 0.06) in the biopsy samples taken using the intact biopsy device (1/31, 3.2%) as compared to biopsy samples taken using the core needle biopsy device (7/36, 19.4%). No significant adverse events were reported. Breast biopsy can be performed safely and accurately using a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device. In this study, such a device trended toward fewer underestimations of DCIS at biopsy compared to the vacuum-assisted core needle sampling biopsy method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16848839     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00268.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  9 in total

1.  Role of one-pass breast lesion excision system in complete excision of high-risk breast lesions with atypia expressed as clusters of microcalcifications.

Authors:  Alexandra Christou; Vassilis Koutoulidis; Dimitra Koulocheri; Evangelia Panourgias; Afrodite Nonni; Constantinos G Zografos; George C Zografos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The breast lesion excision system (BLES): a novel technique in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of small indeterminate breast lesions?

Authors:  Steven D Allen; Ashish Nerurkar; Guidabaldo U Querci Della Rovere
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Value of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in non-palpable suspicious calcifications: an eight-year single institution experience with 587 patients.

Authors:  Shiping Li; Feilin Qu; Yinlong Yang; Lei Wang; Juping Shen; Zhiming Shao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

4.  Minimally Invasive Excision of Breast Masses under Ultrasound Guidance: A Single Center's Five-Year Experience on the Breast Lesion Excision System.

Authors:  Hakki Muammer Karakas; Gulsah Yildirim
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 5.  Status quo and development trend of breast biopsy technology.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Zhang; Lichun Wei; Jie Li; Yi-Qiong Zheng; Xi-Ru Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2013-02

6.  Effectiveness of the diagnostic pathway of BLES: could it be safely used as a therapeutic method in selected benign lesions?

Authors:  Tuğba İlkem Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan; Sibel Özkan Gürdal; Meltem Öznur; Ömer Özçağlayan; Mücahit Doğru; Birol Topçu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  Radiofrequency-assisted intact specimen biopsy of breast tumors: critical evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations.

Authors:  Suzanne C E Diepstraten; Helena M Verkooijen; Paul J van Diest; Wouter B Veldhuis; Arancha M Fernandez-Gallardo; Katya M Duvivier; Arjen J Witkamp; Thijs van Dalen; Willem P Th M Mali; Maurice A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  The breast lesion excision system procedure: An optimal solution for the management of indeterminate BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions in women with severe anxiety.

Authors:  Semih Hot; Zafer Ü Coşkun; Adem Akçakaya; Ömer Bender; Ülkü A Türkmen; Pınar Ö Nayır; Ayhan Sarı; Ayşe B Hot
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Minimally invasive breast cancer excision using the breast lesion excision system under ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  W B G Sanderink; L J A Strobbe; P Bult; M S Schlooz-Vries; S Lardenoije; D J Venderink; I Sechopoulos; N Karssemeijer; W Vreuls; R M Mann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.