Literature DB >> 1748429

Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease.

D L Page1, T E Kidd, W D Dupont, J F Simpson, L W Rogers.   

Abstract

We have stratified the cancer risk implications of lobular pattern in situ neoplasias of the breast by separating marked examples of this histologic spectrum (lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS]) from lesser examples (atypical lobular hyperplasia). The lesser-developed examples have been shown previously to have a lower relative risk (RR) of later invasive carcinoma of the breast (IBC). Forty-eight examples of LCIS were found in 10,542 otherwise benign breast biopsies, representing an incidence of 0.5%. Nine patients were excluded from follow-up because of bilateral mastectomy within 6 months of entry biopsy, IBC within 6 months of entry biopsy, or prior IBC. Follow-up of the remaining 39 patients was complete, averaged 18 years, and revealed an RR of subsequent IBC of 6.9 (P less than .00001). Average overall follow-up for LCIS patients was 19 years; it was 25 years for those alive and free of IBC at the time of their follow-up interview. Neither family history of IBC nor postmenopausal estrogen therapy further affected risk. The absolute risk of IBC after LCIS was 17% at 15 years (adjusted for withdrawals), and the RR was 8.0 in the first 15 years of follow-up compared with the general population. An analysis based on a time-dependent hazards model found that during the first 15 years following biopsy women with LCIS had 10.8 times the risk of breast cancer compared with biopsied women of comparable age who lacked proliferative disease. Some previously published articles reporting lobular neoplasia (LN) suggest that those series with the greatest incidences of LN (whether termed LN or LCIS) have the lowest RR of subsequent breast cancer. Those series with higher incidences of LN include less well-developed histologic patterns of LN (atypical lobular hyperplasia). We conclude that our study of LN and studies performed by others support the higher risk of IBC after histologically flagrant examples (LCIS, about nine times higher) and a relatively lower but definable risk after more histologically subtle examples (atypical lobular hyperplasia, four to five times lower). This relative cancer risk is probably not constant over more than 15 years; thus, cancer risk 15 to 25 years after initial diagnosis of LCIS is uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1748429     DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(91)90105-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  63 in total

Review 1.  Significance of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia at margins of breast conservation specimens: a report of 38 cases and literature review.

Authors:  Sophia K Apple; Mahan Matin; Eric P Olsen; Neda A Moatamed
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.644

2.  Loss of heterozygosity in lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  S R Lakhani; N Collins; J P Sloane; M R Stratton
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-04

3.  Surgical Management of Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Jennifer Steiman; Jessica R Schumacher; Lee G Wilke; Caprice C Greenberg; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Synchronous Ipsilateral Lobular Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Megan E Miller; Shirin Muhsen; Emily C Zabor; Jessica Flynn; Cristina Olcese; Dilip Giri; Kimberly J Van Zee; Melissa Pilewskie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  [Lobular neoplasms and invasive lobular breast cancer].

Authors:  H-P Sinn; B Helmchen; J Heil; S Aulmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Accuracy of screening mammography in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia of the breast.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Tracy Onega; Laura C Collins; Brian L Sprague; Deirdre A Hill; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Management of in situ and minimally invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  E R Frykberg; K I Bland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Evaluation and management of high risk and premalignant lesions of the breast.

Authors:  D L Page; R A Jensen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Historical and epidemiologic background of human premalignant breast disease.

Authors:  D L Page; R A Jensen; J F Simpson; W D Dupont
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 10.  Anatomic indicators (histologic and cytologic) of increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.