Sarah L Szanton1,2, Qian-Li Xue2,3, Bruce Leff1,2,3, Jack Guralnik4, Jennifer L Wolff1,2, Elizabeth K Tanner1, Cynthia Boyd3, Roland J Thorpe5, David Bishai6, Laura N Gitlin1,7. 1. Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. 5. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 7. College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: Disability among older adults is a strong predictor of health outcomes, health service use, and health care costs. Few interventions have reduced disability among older adults. Objective: To determine whether a 10-session, home-based, multidisciplinary program reduces disability. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial of 300 low-income community-dwelling adults with a disability in Baltimore, Maryland, between March 18, 2012, and April 29, 2016, 65 years or older, cognitively intact, and with self-reported difficulty with 1 or more activities of daily living (ADLs) or 2 or more instrumental ADLs (IADLs), participants were interviewed in their home at baseline, 5 months (end point), and 12 months (follow-up) by trained research assistants who were masked to the group allocation. Participants were randomized to either the intervention (CAPABLE) group (n = 152) or the attention control group (n = 148) through a computer-based assignment scheme, stratified by sex in randomized blocks. Intention-to-treat analysis was used to assess the intervention. Data were analyzed from September 2017 through August 2018. Interventions: The CAPABLE group received up to 10 home visits over 5 months by occupational therapists, registered nurses, and home modifiers to address self-identified functional goals by enhancing individual capacity and the home environment. The control group received 10 social home visits by a research assistant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Disability with ADLs or IADLs at 5 months. Each ADL and IADL task was self-scored from 0 to 2 according to whether in the previous month the person did not have difficulty and did not need help (0), did not need help but had difficulty (1), or needed help regardless of difficulty (2). The overall score ranged from 0 to 16 points. Results: Of the 300 people randomized to either the CAPABLE group (n = 152) or the control group (n = 148), 133 of the CAPABLE participants (87.5%) were women with a mean (SD) age of 75.7 (7.6) years; 126 (82.9%) self-identified as black. Of the controls, 129 (87.2%) were women with a mean (SD) age of 75.4 (7.4) years; 133 (89.9%) self-identified as black. CAPABLE participation resulted in 30% reduction in ADL disability scores at 5 months (relative risk [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.93; P = .01) vs control participation. CAPABLE participation resulted in a statistically nonsignificant 17% reduction in IADL disability scores (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65-1.06; P = .13) vs control participation. Participants in the CAPABLE group vs those in the control group were more likely to report that the program made their life easier (82.3% vs 43.1%; P < .001), helped them take care of themselves (79.8% vs 35.5%; P < .001), and helped them gain confidence in managing daily challenges (79.9% vs 37.7%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Low-income community-dwelling older adults who received the CAPABLE intervention experienced substantial decrease in disability; disability may be modifiable through addressing both the person and the environment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01576133.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Disability among older adults is a strong predictor of health outcomes, health service use, and health care costs. Few interventions have reduced disability among older adults. Objective: To determine whether a 10-session, home-based, multidisciplinary program reduces disability. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial of 300 low-income community-dwelling adults with a disability in Baltimore, Maryland, between March 18, 2012, and April 29, 2016, 65 years or older, cognitively intact, and with self-reported difficulty with 1 or more activities of daily living (ADLs) or 2 or more instrumental ADLs (IADLs), participants were interviewed in their home at baseline, 5 months (end point), and 12 months (follow-up) by trained research assistants who were masked to the group allocation. Participants were randomized to either the intervention (CAPABLE) group (n = 152) or the attention control group (n = 148) through a computer-based assignment scheme, stratified by sex in randomized blocks. Intention-to-treat analysis was used to assess the intervention. Data were analyzed from September 2017 through August 2018. Interventions: The CAPABLE group received up to 10 home visits over 5 months by occupational therapists, registered nurses, and home modifiers to address self-identified functional goals by enhancing individual capacity and the home environment. The control group received 10 social home visits by a research assistant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Disability with ADLs or IADLs at 5 months. Each ADL and IADL task was self-scored from 0 to 2 according to whether in the previous month the person did not have difficulty and did not need help (0), did not need help but had difficulty (1), or needed help regardless of difficulty (2). The overall score ranged from 0 to 16 points. Results: Of the 300 people randomized to either the CAPABLE group (n = 152) or the control group (n = 148), 133 of the CAPABLE participants (87.5%) were women with a mean (SD) age of 75.7 (7.6) years; 126 (82.9%) self-identified as black. Of the controls, 129 (87.2%) were women with a mean (SD) age of 75.4 (7.4) years; 133 (89.9%) self-identified as black. CAPABLE participation resulted in 30% reduction in ADL disability scores at 5 months (relative risk [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.93; P = .01) vs control participation. CAPABLE participation resulted in a statistically nonsignificant 17% reduction in IADL disability scores (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65-1.06; P = .13) vs control participation. Participants in the CAPABLE group vs those in the control group were more likely to report that the program made their life easier (82.3% vs 43.1%; P < .001), helped them take care of themselves (79.8% vs 35.5%; P < .001), and helped them gain confidence in managing daily challenges (79.9% vs 37.7%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Low-income community-dwelling older adults who received the CAPABLE intervention experienced substantial decrease in disability; disability may be modifiable through addressing both the person and the environment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01576133.
Authors: Steven H Belle; Louis Burgio; Robert Burns; David Coon; Sara J Czaja; Dolores Gallagher-Thompson; Laura N Gitlin; Julie Klinger; Kathy Mann Koepke; Chin Chin Lee; Jennifer Martindale-Adams; Linda Nichols; Richard Schulz; Sidney Stahl; Alan Stevens; Laraine Winter; Song Zhang Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sarah L Szanton; Roland J Thorpe; Cynthia Boyd; Elizabeth K Tanner; Bruce Leff; Emily Agree; Qian-Li Xue; Jerilyn K Allen; Christopher L Seplaki; Carlos O Weiss; Jack M Guralnik; Laura N Gitlin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; Deanna B McQuillan; Jennifer L Ellis; Matthew L Maciejewski; Chan Zeng; Mary B Barton; Cynthia M Boyd; Martin Fortin; Shari M Ling; Ming Tai-Seale; James D Ralston; Christine S Ritchie; Donna M Zulman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sarah E LaFave; Marianne Granbom; Thomas K M Cudjoe; Alex Gottsch; Gerard Shorb; Sarah L Szanton Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Thomas M Gill; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Linda Leo-Summers; Ling Han Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sarah L Szanton; Lindy Clemson; Minhui Liu; Laura N Gitlin; Melissa D Hladek; Sarah E LaFave; David L Roth; Katherine A Marx; Cynthia Felix; Safiyyah M Okoye; Xuan Zhang; Svetlana Bautista; Marianne Granbom Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2020-03-20
Authors: Safiyyah M Okoye; Laura J Samuel; Chanee Fabius; John Mulcahy; Lisa M Reider; Sarah L Szanton; Jennifer L Wolff Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2021-04-20
Authors: Minhui Liu; Qian-Li Xue; Laura N Gitlin; Jennifer L Wolff; Jack Guralnik; Bruce Leff; Sarah L Szanton Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Bruce Leff; Orla C Sheehan; Krista L Harrison; Ashley Eaton England; Alex Mickler; Pragyashree Sharma Basyal; Sarah K Garrigues; Mattan Schuchman; Carla Perissinotto; Sarah B Garrett; Christine S Ritchie Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2021-04-01