Literature DB >> 28475346

Discrimination of Native-like States of Membrane Proteins with Implicit Membrane-based Scoring Functions.

Bercem Dutagaci1, Kitiyaporn Wittayanarakul2, Takaharu Mori3, Michael Feig1.   

Abstract

A scoring protocol based on implicit membrane-based scoring functions and a new protocol for optimizing the positioning of proteins inside the membrane was evaluated for its capacity to discriminate native-like states from misfolded decoys. A decoy set previously established by the Baker lab (Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2006, 62, 1010-1025) was used along with a second set that was generated to cover higher resolution models. The Implicit Membrane Model 1 (IMM1), IMM1 model with CHARMM 36 parameters (IMM1-p36), generalized Born with simple switching (GBSW), and heterogeneous dielectric generalized Born versions 2 (HDGBv2) and 3 (HDGBv3) were tested along with the new HDGB van der Waals (HDGBvdW) model that adds implicit van der Waals contributions to the solvation free energy. For comparison, scores were also calculated with the distance-scaled finite ideal-gas reference (DFIRE) scoring function. Z-scores for native state discrimination, energy vs root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) correlations, and the ability to select the most native-like structures as top-scoring decoys were evaluated to assess the performance of the scoring functions. Ranking of the decoys in the Baker set that were relatively far from the native state was challenging and dominated largely by packing interactions that were captured best by DFIRE with less benefit of the implicit membrane-based models. Accounting for the membrane environment was much more important in the second decoy set where especially the HDGB-based scoring functions performed very well in ranking decoys and providing significant correlations between scores and RMSD, which shows promise for improving membrane protein structure prediction and refinement applications. The new membrane structure scoring protocol was implemented in the MEMScore web server ( http://feiglab.org/memscore ).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28475346      PMCID: PMC5512695          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  69 in total

1.  Structure of fumarate reductase from Wolinella succinogenes at 2.2 A resolution.

Authors:  C R Lancaster; A Kröger; M Auer; H Michel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

6.  Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.

Authors:  Brian N Dominy; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server.

Authors:  G E Tusnády; I Simon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Free-energy calculations highlight differences in accuracy between X-ray and NMR structures and add value to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  M R Lee; P A Kollman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  A Liwo; J Lee; D R Ripoll; J Pillardy; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Protein Structure Prediction and Design in a Biologically Realistic Implicit Membrane.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Patrick J Fleming; Karen G Fleming; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Structure refinement of membrane proteins via molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2018-05-06

3.  Diverse Scientific Benchmarks for Implicit Membrane Energy Functions.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Rituparna Samanta; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 6.578

4.  Efficient Flexible Fitting Refinement with Automatic Error Fixing for De Novo Structure Modeling from Cryo-EM Density Maps.

Authors:  Takaharu Mori; Genki Terashi; Daisuke Matsuoka; Daisuke Kihara; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.162

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.