W Fingrut1, L A Beck1,2, D Lo1,2. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 2. Division of Hematology and Oncology, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
Background: Communities of practice (cops) have been shown to be effective models for achieving quality outcomes in health care. Objective: Here, we describe the application of the cop model to the Canadian oncology context. Methods: We established an oncology cop at our urban community hospital and its networks. Goals were to decrease barriers to access, foster collaboration, and improve knowledge of guidelines in cancer care. We hosted 6 in-person multidisciplinary meetings, focusing on screening, diagnosis, and management of common solid tumours. Health care providers affiliated with our hospital were invited to attend and to complete post-meeting surveys. Likert scales assessed whether cop goals were realized. Results: Meetings attracted a mean of 57 attendees (range: 48-65 attendees), with a mean of 84% completing the surveys and consenting to the analysis. Attendees included family physicians (mean: 41%), specialist physicians (mean: 24%), nurses (mean: 10%), and allied health care providers (mean: 22%). Repeat attendance increased during the series, with 85% of attendees at the final meeting having attended 1 or more prior meetings. Across the series, most participants agreed or strongly agreed that the cop reduced barriers (mean: 76.0% ± 7.9%) and improved access to cancer care services (mean: 82.4% ± 8.1%) and subject matter experts (mean: 91.7% ± 4.2%); fostered teamwork (mean: 84.5% ± 6.8%) and a culture of collaboration (mean: 94.8% ± 4.2%); improved knowledge of cancer care services (mean: 93.3% ± 4.8%), standards of practice (mean: 92.3% ± 3.1%), and quality indicators (mean: 77.5% ± 6.3%); and improved cancer-related practice (mean: 88.8% ± 4.6%) and satisfaction in caring for cancer patients (mean: 82.9% ± 6.8%). Participant feedback carried a potential for bias. Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of oncology cops and found that participants perceived their value in reducing barriers to access, fostering collaboration, and improving knowledge of guidelines in cancer care.
Background: Communities of practice (cops) have been shown to be effective models for achieving quality outcomes in health care. Objective: Here, we describe the application of the cop model to the Canadian oncology context. Methods: We established an oncology cop at our urban community hospital and its networks. Goals were to decrease barriers to access, foster collaboration, and improve knowledge of guidelines in cancer care. We hosted 6 in-person multidisciplinary meetings, focusing on screening, diagnosis, and management of common solid tumours. Health care providers affiliated with our hospital were invited to attend and to complete post-meeting surveys. Likert scales assessed whether cop goals were realized. Results: Meetings attracted a mean of 57 attendees (range: 48-65 attendees), with a mean of 84% completing the surveys and consenting to the analysis. Attendees included family physicians (mean: 41%), specialist physicians (mean: 24%), nurses (mean: 10%), and allied health care providers (mean: 22%). Repeat attendance increased during the series, with 85% of attendees at the final meeting having attended 1 or more prior meetings. Across the series, most participants agreed or strongly agreed that the cop reduced barriers (mean: 76.0% ± 7.9%) and improved access to cancer care services (mean: 82.4% ± 8.1%) and subject matter experts (mean: 91.7% ± 4.2%); fostered teamwork (mean: 84.5% ± 6.8%) and a culture of collaboration (mean: 94.8% ± 4.2%); improved knowledge of cancer care services (mean: 93.3% ± 4.8%), standards of practice (mean: 92.3% ± 3.1%), and quality indicators (mean: 77.5% ± 6.3%); and improved cancer-related practice (mean: 88.8% ± 4.6%) and satisfaction in caring for cancerpatients (mean: 82.9% ± 6.8%). Participant feedback carried a potential for bias. Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of oncology cops and found that participants perceived their value in reducing barriers to access, fostering collaboration, and improving knowledge of guidelines in cancer care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Communities of practice; collaboration; knowledge management; partnerships; quality
Authors: Marta L Render; Suzanne Brungs; Uma Kotagal; Mary Nicholson; Patricia Burns; Deborah Ellis; Marla Clifton; Rosie Fardo; Mark Scott; Larry Hirschhorn Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2006-05
Authors: Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; James Watters; Claire Crossley; Elena Goubanova; Arifa Abdulla; Hartley Stern; Thomas K Oliver Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Elena Goubanova; Karen Sequeira; Arifa Abdulla; Rose Cook; Claire Crossley; Bernard Langer; Andrew J Smith; Hartley Stern Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2008 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.926
Authors: M Fung-Kee-Fung; R P Boushey; J Watters; R Morash; J Smylie; C Morash; C Degrasse; S Sundaresan Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.677