Debbie Tolson1, Jo Booth, Andrew Lowndes. 1. School of Nursing, Midwifery & Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. d.tolson@gcal.ac.uk
Abstract
AIM: To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence-based practice. BACKGROUND: The model features practice-development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college. METHODS: Twenty-four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence-based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months. RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the patient-related criteria and 35% of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work-based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence-based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence-based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real-time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.
AIM: To determine the impact of the Caledonian Development Model, designed to promote evidence-based practice. BACKGROUND: The model features practice-development activities, benchmarking, knowledge pooling and translation through membership of a community of practice and a virtual college. METHODS: Twenty-four nurses, from 18 practice sites formed three communities of practice, each selecting evidence-based guidance to implement. A modified group supervision framework empowered nurses to champion local implementation. Outcomes were determined at 6 months. RESULTS: Eighty per cent of the patient-related criteria and 35% of the facilities criteria were achieved. The Revised Nursing Work Index indicated these nurses experienced greater autonomy (P = 0.019) and increased organizational support (P = 0.037). Focus groups revealed a deepening organizational support for the initiative over time, illuminated work-based learning challenges and overall enthusiasm for the approach. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the model effectively promoted evidence-based practice, most notably at the level of the individual patient. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Time and budgetary constraints necessitate smart, value for money approaches to developing evidence-based practice and improved care standards. This work demonstrates an effective model that strikes a balance between individual and group learning, virtual and real-time activities, coupled with resource pooling across organizations and sectors.
Authors: Sandra A Mitchell; Cheryl A Fisher; Clare E Hastings; Leanne B Silverman; Gwenyth R Wallen Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Geetha Ranmuthugala; Jennifer J Plumb; Frances C Cunningham; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 2.655