Literature DB >> 34225704

Needs assessment for the creation of a community of practice in a community health navigator cohort.

Rachel J Livergant1, Natalie C Ludlow1, Kerry A McBrien2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community Health Navigators (CHNs) are members of a patient's care team that aim to reduce barriers in accessing healthcare. CHNs have been described in various healthcare settings, including chronic disease management. The ENhancing COMmunity health through Patient navigation, Advocacy, and Social Support (ENCOMPASS) program of research employs CHNs, who are trained to improve access to care and community resources for patients with multiple chronic diseases. With complex and demanding roles, it is essential that CHNs communicate with each other to maintain knowledge exchange and best practices. A Community of Practice (CoP) is a model of situated learning that promotes communication, dedication, and collaboration that can facilitate this communication. The objective of this study was to engage with CHNs to determine how a CoP could be implemented to promote consistency in practices and knowledge for CHNs across primary care sites.
METHODS: A needs assessment for a CHN CoP was conducted using sequential steps of inquiry. A preliminary focused literature review (FLR) was done to examine the ways in which other healthcare CoPs have been implemented. Results from the FLR guided the creation of an exploratory survey and group interview with key informants to understand best approaches for CoP creation. Political, economic, social, and technological (PEST) and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analyses synthesized results in a comprehensive manner for strategic recommendations.
RESULTS: The FLR identified different approaches and components of healthcare CoPs and guided analyses of mitigatable risk factors and leverageable assets for the intervention. The survey and group interview revealed an informal and effective CoP amongst current CHNs, with preferred methods including coffee meetings, group trainings, and seminars. A well-maintained web platform with features such as an encrypted discussion forum, community resource listing, calendar of events, and semi-annual CHN conferences were suggested methods for creating an inter-regional, formal CoP.
CONCLUSION: The study findings recognise the presence of an informal CoP within the studied CHN cohort. Implementation of a formal CoP should complement current CoP approaches and aid in facilitating expansion to other primary care centres utilizing digital communication methods, such as a comprehensive web platform and online forum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community health navigator; Community of practice; Knowledge exchange; Primary care; Quality improvement

Year:  2021        PMID: 34225704     DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06507-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  17 in total

1.  Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.

Authors:  E B Ferlie; S M Shortell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Enrolment in primary care networks: impact on outcomes and processes of care for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Braden J Manns; Marcello Tonelli; Jianguo Zhang; David J T Campbell; Peter Sargious; Bharati Ayyalasomayajula; Fiona Clement; Jeffrey A Johnson; Andreas Laupacis; Richard Lewanczuk; Kerry McBrien; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Evaluating an online occupational therapy community of practice and its role in supporting occupational therapy practice.

Authors:  Tammy Hoffmann; Laura Desha; Kellie Verrall
Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.856

4.  Patient navigators becoming the norm in Canada.

Authors:  Erin Walkinshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  AccrualNet: Addressing Low Accrual Via a Knowledge-Based, Community of Practice Platform.

Authors:  Holly A Massett; Linda K Parreco; Rose Mary Padberg; Ellen S Richmond; Marie E Rienzo; Colleen E Ryan Leonard; Whitney Quesenbery; H William Killiam; Lenora E Johnson; David M Dilts
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Exploring a "community of practice" methodology as a regional platform for large-scale collaboration in cancer surgery-the Ottawa approach.

Authors:  M Fung-Kee-Fung; R P Boushey; R Morash
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kerry A McBrien; Noah Ivers; Lianne Barnieh; Jacob J Bailey; Diane L Lorenzetti; David Nicholas; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Richard Lewanczuk; Alun Edwards; Ted Braun; Braden Manns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceptions of family physician trainees and trainers regarding the usefulness of a virtual community of practice.

Authors:  Stephen Barnett; Sandra C Jones; Sue Bennett; Don Iverson; Andrew Bonney
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Evaluating the impact of a falls prevention community of practice in a residential aged care setting: a realist approach.

Authors:  Jacqueline Francis-Coad; Christopher Etherton-Beer; Caroline Bulsara; Nicole Blackburn; Paola Chivers; Anne-Marie Hill
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.