M Fung-Kee-Fung1, R P Boushey1, J Watters2, R Morash3, J Smylie3, C Morash1, C Degrasse3, S Sundaresan1. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. ; Surgical Oncology Program, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. 3. The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients requiring assessment for cancer surgery encounter a complex series of steps in their cancer journey. Further complicating the process is the fact that care is often delivered in a fragmented, silo-based system. Isolated strategies to improve cancer outcomes within those systems have had inconsistent results. METHODS: A regional quality improvement collaborative was developed based on a community of practice (cop) platform, a hub-and-spoke infrastructure, and a regional steering committee linking cop improvement projects with affiliated hospitals and their strategic priorities. The cop provided an avenue for multidisciplinary teams to collect and compare their performance data and to institute regional standards through literature review, discussion, and consensus. Regional interdisciplinary teams developed a set of quality indicators linked to mutually agreed-upon care standards. A limited regional database supported feedback about performance against both provincial and regional standards. RESULTS: The cop approach helped to develop a multihospital collaboration that facilitated care quality improvements on a regional scale, with clinical outcomes of the improvements able to be measured. The 9 participating hospitals delivered cancer surgery in the specific disease sites according to practitioner-developed and provincially- or regionally-generated care standards and clinical pathways. Compliance with provincial evidence-based clinical guidelines improved (20% increase in 2010-2011 compared with 2006-2007). Other significant improvements included standardization and implementation of regional perioperative pathways in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer disease sites; rectal cancer surgery centralization; increased use of sentinel lymph node biopsies in breast cancer surgery; and decreased positive surgical margin rates in prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Improved quality is likely a result of diverse confounding factors. The deliberately cultivated multihospital multidisciplinary cops have contributed to positive structural and functional change in cancer surgery in the region. This regional cop model has the potential to play an important role in the development of successful collaborations in care quality improvement.
BACKGROUND:Patients requiring assessment for cancer surgery encounter a complex series of steps in their cancer journey. Further complicating the process is the fact that care is often delivered in a fragmented, silo-based system. Isolated strategies to improve cancer outcomes within those systems have had inconsistent results. METHODS: A regional quality improvement collaborative was developed based on a community of practice (cop) platform, a hub-and-spoke infrastructure, and a regional steering committee linking cop improvement projects with affiliated hospitals and their strategic priorities. The cop provided an avenue for multidisciplinary teams to collect and compare their performance data and to institute regional standards through literature review, discussion, and consensus. Regional interdisciplinary teams developed a set of quality indicators linked to mutually agreed-upon care standards. A limited regional database supported feedback about performance against both provincial and regional standards. RESULTS: The cop approach helped to develop a multihospital collaboration that facilitated care quality improvements on a regional scale, with clinical outcomes of the improvements able to be measured. The 9 participating hospitals delivered cancer surgery in the specific disease sites according to practitioner-developed and provincially- or regionally-generated care standards and clinical pathways. Compliance with provincial evidence-based clinical guidelines improved (20% increase in 2010-2011 compared with 2006-2007). Other significant improvements included standardization and implementation of regional perioperative pathways in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer disease sites; rectal cancer surgery centralization; increased use of sentinel lymph node biopsies in breast cancer surgery; and decreased positive surgical margin rates in prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Improved quality is likely a result of diverse confounding factors. The deliberately cultivated multihospital multidisciplinary cops have contributed to positive structural and functional change in cancer surgery in the region. This regional cop model has the potential to play an important role in the development of successful collaborations in care quality improvement.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community of practice; cancer care; quality improvement; regional collaboration
Authors: Tara M Breslin; Jamie Caughran; Jane Pettinga; Cheryl Wesen; Ann Mehringer; Huiying Yin; David Share; Samuel M Silver Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; James Watters; Claire Crossley; Elena Goubanova; Arifa Abdulla; Hartley Stern; Thomas K Oliver Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Elena Goubanova; Karen Sequeira; Arifa Abdulla; Rose Cook; Claire Crossley; Bernard Langer; Andrew J Smith; Hartley Stern Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2008 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.926
Authors: G T O'Connor; H B Quinton; N D Traven; L D Ramunno; T A Dodds; T A Marciniak; J E Wennberg Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-02-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Rachel S Ozer; Bill Davies; Stephanie Pick; Kate Duke; David J Stewart; M Neil Reaume; Marcus Ward; Katelyn Balchin; Robert M MacRae; Shannon Nelson; Julie Renaud; Dennis Garvin; Suzanne Madore; Jason R Pantarotto Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: M Fung-Kee-Fung; D E Maziak; J R Pantarotto; J Smylie; L Taylor; T Timlin; T Cacciotti; P J Villeneuve; C Dennie; C Bornais; S Madore; J Aquino; P Wheatley-Price; R S Ozer; D J Stewart Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Marko Simunovic; Christine Fahim; Angela Coates; David Urbach; Craig Earle; Vanja Grubac; Melissa Brouwers; Mary Ann O'Brien; Nancy Baxter Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Marko Simunovic; David Robert Urbach; Christine Fahim; Mary Ann O'Brien; Craig C Earle; Melissa Brouwers; Evgenia Gatov; Vanja Grubac; Daniel McCormack; Nancy Baxter Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-07-01