L Z Adriano1, J C Barasuol2, M Cardoso3, M Bolan4. 1. Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil. 2. Federal University of Santa Catarina, João Pio Duarte Silva, 114-505 B, Córrego Grande, 88037-000, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. jessica.barasuol@hotmail.com. 3. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Praça Padre José de Anchieta, 333, Córrego Grande, Florianópolis, SC, 88037-255, Brazil. 4. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Comandante Constantino Nicolau Spyrides, 3770-304 A, Agronômica, Florianópolis, SC, 88025-002, Brazil.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the accuracy of three electronic apex locators in the measurement of the root length of primary teeth with the radiographic and direct visual techniques. METHODS: The sample of the in vitro study was 102 root canals of primary molars. For the direct visual technique, the root canal file was introduced into the canal until its tip passed the apical foramen, then it was moved back to the limit of the foramen or root resorption and the measurement was made with a millimetre ruler. For the radiographic measurement, a calibrated and blinded researcher (κ > 0.87) measured the root canals using the same rule. Measurements with apex locators were performed by inserting the file into the canal until the word "Apex" or audible warning to indicate the foramen or resorption. For data analysis, one-way ANOVA for repeated measurements and the Sidak post hoc tests were performed. RESULTS: The direct measurement (µ = 8.57) did not present statistical difference when compared to the Root ZX II measurement (µ = 8.45), as opposed to the radiographic measurements (µ = 8.12), the Endus (µ = 8.24) and iPex II (µ = 8.29). CONCLUSION: The use of apex locators was superior to the radiographic method and the Root ZX II was the most effective.
AIM: To compare the accuracy of three electronic apex locators in the measurement of the root length of primary teeth with the radiographic and direct visual techniques. METHODS: The sample of the in vitro study was 102 root canals of primary molars. For the direct visual technique, the root canal file was introduced into the canal until its tip passed the apical foramen, then it was moved back to the limit of the foramen or root resorption and the measurement was made with a millimetre ruler. For the radiographic measurement, a calibrated and blinded researcher (κ > 0.87) measured the root canals using the same rule. Measurements with apex locators were performed by inserting the file into the canal until the word "Apex" or audible warning to indicate the foramen or resorption. For data analysis, one-way ANOVA for repeated measurements and the Sidak post hoc tests were performed. RESULTS: The direct measurement (µ = 8.57) did not present statistical difference when compared to the Root ZX II measurement (µ = 8.45), as opposed to the radiographic measurements (µ = 8.12), the Endus (µ = 8.24) and iPex II (µ = 8.29). CONCLUSION: The use of apex locators was superior to the radiographic method and the Root ZX II was the most effective.
Authors: P Nelson-Filho; P C Romualdo; K C Bonifácio; M R Leonardo; R A B Silva; L A B Silva Journal: Int Endod J Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 5.264
Authors: Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos; Michelli de Medeiros Bueno; Suyane Maria Luna-Cruz; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Carlos Augusto de Oliveira Fernandes Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.698