Literature DB >> 35196717

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Patient-Requested Corrections to the Medical Record through Use of a Patient Portal: Findings from a National Survey.

Oliver T Nguyen1,2, Young-Rock Hong3, Amir Alishahi Tabriz2,4, Karim Hanna5, Kea Turner2,4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Providing patients with medical records access is one strategy that health systems can utilize to reduce medical errors. However, how often patients request corrections to their records on a national scale is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop population-level estimates of patients who request corrections to their medical records using national-level data. We also identified patient-level correlates of requesting corrections.
METHODS: We used the 2017 and 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey and examined all patient portal adopters. We applied jackknife replicate weights to develop population-representative estimates of the prevalence of requesting medical record corrections. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify correlates of requesting corrections while controlling for demographic factors, health care utilization patterns, health status, technology/internet use patterns, and year.
RESULTS: Across 1,657 respondents, 125 (weighted estimate: 6.5%) reported requesting corrections to their medical records. In unadjusted models, greater odds of requesting corrections were observed among patients who reported their race/ethnicity as non-Hispanic black (odds ratio [OR]: 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-4.43), had frequent portal visits (OR: 3.92, 95% CI: 1.51-10.23), and had entered data into the portal (OR: 7.51, 95% CI: 4.08-13.81). In adjusted models, we found greater odds of requesting corrections among those who reported frequent portal visits (OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.24-9.33) and those who reported entering data into the portal (OR: 6.43, 95% CI: 3.20-12.94). No other significant differences were observed.
CONCLUSION: Prior to the Information Blocking Final Rule in April 2021, approximately 6.5% of patients requested corrections of errors in their medical records at the national level. Those who reported higher engagement with their health, as proxied by portal visit frequency and entering data into the portal, were more likely to request corrections. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35196717      PMCID: PMC8866035          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  45 in total

1.  Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Stephen F Rothemich; Robert E Johnson; J Eric Peele; Tina D Cunningham; Daniel R Longo; Ghalib A Bello; Gary R Matzke
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use.

Authors:  Kea Turner; Young-Rock Hong; Sandhya Yadav; Jinhai Huo; Arch G Mainous
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records.

Authors:  Shireesha Dhanireddy; Jan Walker; Lisa Reisch; Natalia Oster; Thomas Delbanco; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record.

Authors:  Cyrus K Yamin; Srinivas Emani; Deborah H Williams; Stuart R Lipsitz; Andrew S Karson; Jonathan S Wald; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-28

5.  Patient-initiated electronic health record amendment requests.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Rebecca Preib; Kai Zheng; Sung W Choi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Problems with the problem list: challenges of transparency in an era of patient curation.

Authors:  Amy S Porter; Jolene O'Callaghan; Kristin A Englund; Robert R Lorenz; Eric Kodish
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Assessment of Patients' Ability to Review Electronic Health Record Information to Identify Potential Errors: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Lisa Freise; Ana Luisa Neves; Kelsey Flott; Paul Harrison; John Kelly; Ara Darzi; Erik K Mayer
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-02-26

8.  Patient portals and broadband internet inequality.

Authors:  Adam T Perzynski; Mary Joan Roach; Sarah Shick; Bill Callahan; Douglas Gunzler; Randall Cebul; David C Kaelber; Anne Huml; John Daryl Thornton; Douglas Einstadter
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  "Concordance between comorbidity data from patient self-report interviews and medical record documentation".

Authors:  William Corser; Alla Sikorskii; Ade Olomu; Manfred Stommel; Camille Proden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Use of Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Accounts Among Patients With Smartphone-Only Internet Access.

Authors:  Kea Turner; Oliver Nguyen; Young-Rock Hong; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Krupal Patel; Heather S L Jim
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.