Literature DB >> 7943483

The danger of applying uniform clinical policies across populations: the case of breast cancer in American Indians.

P A Nutting1, B N Calonge, D C Iverson, L A Green.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the implications of annual screening mammography for cost and mortality in American Indian populations with differing baseline breast cancer rates.
METHODS: A decision tree compared annual screening mammography and screening clinical breast examination with referral for diagnostic mammography when appropriate. The decision tree was constructed to examine the effect of different base-line cancer rates, stage at diagnosis, and stage-specific survival. Outcomes included 5-year relative survival, deaths prevented at 5 years, cost per death prevented, and total costs.
RESULTS: The findings suggest that the total cost of breast cancer is 3.6 times higher with the screening mammography program but results in a 27.9% reduction in breast cancer deaths over the first 5 years of the program. Both costs and deaths prevented are sensitive to the incidence of breast cancer in the population and are less favorable in the range of incidence seen in American Indians.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost and impact of a given strategy for cancer screening vary among communities with different disease incidence, stage at diagnosis, and stage-specific survival, as seen in American Indian populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7943483      PMCID: PMC1615100          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.10.1631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  22 in total

1.  Low cost mammography screening. Practical considerations with emphasis on mobile operation.

Authors:  E A Sickles; W N Weber; H B Galvin; S H Ominsky; R A Sollitto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Cost-benefit determinations in screening mammography.

Authors:  M Moskowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Race and socio-economic status in survival from breast cancer.

Authors:  H H Dayal; R N Power; C Chiu
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

4.  Contrasts in survival of black and white cancer patients, 1960-73.

Authors:  L M Axtell; M H Myers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  A clinically effective breast cancer screening program can be cost-effective, too.

Authors:  A P Carter; R S Thompson; R V Bourdeau; J Andenes; H Mustin; H Straley
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Survival of American Indian and Hispanic cancer patients in New Mexico and Arizona, 1969-82.

Authors:  J M Samet; C R Key; W C Hunt; J S Goodwin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Race, socioeconomic status, and other prognostic factors for survival from prostate cancer.

Authors:  H H Dayal; L Polissar; S Dahlberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Cancer surveillance in a remote Indian population in northwestern Ontario.

Authors:  T K Young; J W Frank
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography.

Authors:  D Cyrlak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cancer incidence in the Zuni Indians of New Mexico.

Authors:  K A Sorem
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct
View more
  6 in total

1.  Breast Cancer-Screening Behavior among Rural California American Indian Women.

Authors:  Felicia Schanche Hodge
Journal:  Am Indian Cult Res J       Date:  2009-09-01

2.  Improving cancer incidence estimates for American Indians in Minnesota.

Authors:  M R Partin; S J Rith-Najarian; J S Slater; J E Korn; N Cobb; J T Soler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Impact of a community-based breast cancer screening program on Hopi women.

Authors:  S R Brown; T Nuno; L Joshweseoma; R C Begay; C Goodluck; R B Harris
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Questionable data and preconceptions: reconsidering the value of mammography for American Indian Women.

Authors:  M R Partin; J E Korn; J S Slater
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Breast cancer screening. First Nations communities in New Brunswick.

Authors:  Sue Tatemichi; Baukje Miedema; Shelley Leighton
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Breast cancer screening services: trade-offs in quality, capacity, outreach, and centralization.

Authors:  Evrim D Güneş; Stephen E Chick; O Zeynep Akşin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.