Literature DB >> 30592477

Association of Nonadherence to Cancer Screening Examinations With Mortality From Unrelated Causes: A Secondary Analysis of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.

Dudith Pierre-Victor1, Paul F Pinsky1.   

Abstract

Importance: Patient nonadherence to chronic disease prevention guidelines is associated with increased mortality. Nonadherence to offered cancer screening tests may be associated with mortality among middle-aged and older adults. Objective: To evaluate the association between nonadherence to cancer screening tests and mortality in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening trial, excluding mortality from cancers studied in the trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomization at 10 US screening centers occurred from November 8, 1993, to July 2, 2001. Original follow-up was through 13 years or December 31, 2009. Participants were re-consented to further follow-up starting May 18, 2011, and were observed until December 31, 2012. Protocol screening tests for the PLCO Cancer Screening trial intervention arm participants (N = 77 443) included chest radiographs and flexible sigmoidoscopy for both sexes, prostate-specific antigen tests and digital rectal examinations for men, and cancer antigen 125 tests and transvaginal ultrasonography for women. At baseline, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. The cohort was classified into those receiving all sex-specified PLCO Cancer Screening trial screening tests at baseline (fully adherent), those receiving some but not all baseline tests (partially adherent), and those receiving no baseline tests (nonadherents). Secondary analysis was ad hoc in the original trial protocol. Statistical analysis was conducted from November 24, 2017, to August 29, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality was ascertained via mailed annual study update questionnaires and searches of the National Death Index. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the association between mortality and adherence, controlling for various covariates.
Results: Of 77 443 participants in the intervention arm, 64 567 (29 537 women and 35 030 men; mean [SD] age, 62.3 [5.3] years) were included in the analysis based on consenting to trial participation before randomization and being eligible for all screening tests. Overall, 55 065 participants (85.3%) were adherent, 2548 (3.9%) were partially adherent, and 6954 (10.8%) were nonadherent with the baseline screening protocol. Within 10 years of follow-up, the hazard ratio of mortality, excluding deaths from cancers studied in the PLCO Cancer Screening trial and controlling only for age, sex, and race/ethnicity (model 1), was 1.73 (95% CI, 1.60-1.89) for nonadherent compared with fully adherent participants and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.19-1.54) for partially compared with fully adherent participants. After adjustment for medical risk factors for mortality and behavioral-related factors (model 2), the hazard ratio decreased to 1.46 (95% CI, 1.34-1.59) for nonadherent compared with fully adherent participants. Conclusions and Relevance: Among participants in a screening trial for multiple cancers, a nonadherence behavior profile marked by nonadherence to protocol screenings was associated with higher overall mortality (excluding deaths from cancers studied in the trial). The generalizability of this finding to routine clinical practice should be assessed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00002540.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30592477      PMCID: PMC6439655          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  22 in total

1.  Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  J Cuzick; R Edwards; N Segnan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy S Atkin; Rob Edwards; Ines Kralj-Hans; Kate Wooldrage; Andrew R Hart; John M A Northover; D Max Parkin; Jane Wardle; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Determinants of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening adherence in Mexican-American women.

Authors:  Patricia Gonzalez; Sheila F Castaneda; Paul J Mills; Gregory A Talavera; John P Elder; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-04

4.  Coronary heart disease and estrogen replacement therapy. Can compliance bias explain the results of observational studies?

Authors:  D B Petitti
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Receipt of Cancer Screening Is a Predictor of Life Expectancy.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Kristin Sheffield; Shuang Li; Alai Tan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Treatment adherence and risk of death after a myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R I Horwitz; C M Viscoli; L Berkman; R M Donaldson; S M Horwitz; C J Murray; D F Ransohoff; J Sindelar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the coronary drug project.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Combined impact of lifestyle factors on mortality: prospective cohort study in US women.

Authors:  Rob M van Dam; Tricia Li; Donna Spiegelman; Oscar H Franco; Frank B Hu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-16

9.  The vicious cycle of inadequate early detection: a complementary study on barriers to cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Corinne R Leach; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Predictors of Non-Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening among Hospitalized Women.

Authors:  Waseem Khaliq; Ali Aamar; Scott M Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Long-term anti-inflammatory diet in relation to improved breast cancer prognosis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Jia-Zheng Sun; Qian-Xue Wu; Zhu-Yue Li; Da-Xue Li; Yong-Fu Xiong; Guo-Chao Zhong; Yang Shi; Qing Li; Jiali Zheng; Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Theodoros Foukakis; Xiang Zhang; Hong-Yuan Li; Ting-Xiu Xiang; Guo-Sheng Ren
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-08-13

2.  Adherence with protocol medication use and mortality from unrelated causes in a prevention trial.

Authors:  Paul Pinsky; Phyllis Goodman; Howard Parnes; Leslie Ford; Lori Minasian
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.637

3.  Long-term anti-inflammatory diet in relation to improved breast cancer prognosis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Jia-Zheng Sun; Qian-Xue Wu; Zhu-Yue Li; Da-Xue Li; Yong-Fu Xiong; Guo-Chao Zhong; Yang Shi; Qing Li; Jiali Zheng; Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Theodoros Foukakis; Xiang Zhang; Hong-Yuan Li; Ting-Xiu Xiang; Guo-Sheng Ren
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-08-13

4.  Association Between Receipt of Cancer Screening and All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Orla C Sheehan; David L Roth; Tansu Cidav; Jin Huang; Shang-En Chung; Talan Zhang; Sei Lee; Qian-Li Xue; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.