Literature DB >> 8205277

Coronary heart disease and estrogen replacement therapy. Can compliance bias explain the results of observational studies?

D B Petitti1.   

Abstract

The overall risk/benefit of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is strongly dependent on assumptions about the effect of ERT on coronary heart disease (CHD). The belief that ERT causes a substantial reduction in the risk of CHD is widespread. The studies that provide support for this belief are all nonexperimental ones. Three analyses of data from two randomized clinical trials of drug treatments for CHD have examined the association of compliance with total mortality in persons who complied with the taking of placebo. In these analyses, compliance with the taking of a placebo was associated with a reduction in overall mortality of the same magnitude as the reduction in the risk of CHD in users of ERT. The benefit of compliance with placebo was not reduced by adjustment for a large number of variables, both medical and sociodemographic, that might affect mortality. Users of ERT are compliers, and the possibility that compliance bias may account for some of the apparent benefit of ERT for CHD must be taken seriously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8205277     DOI: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90056-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hormone replacement therapy, cancer, controversies, and women's health: historical, epidemiological, biological, clinical, and advocacy perspectives.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Ilana Löwy; Robert Aronowitz; Judyann Bigby; Kay Dickersin; Elizabeth Garner; Jean-Paul Gaudillière; Carolina Hinestrosa; Ruth Hubbard; Paula A Johnson; Stacey A Missmer; Judy Norsigian; Cynthia Pearson; Charles E Rosenberg; Lynn Rosenberg; Barbara G Rosenkrantz; Barbara Seaman; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto; Joe Thornton; George Weisz
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Hormone replacement therapy in the aged. A state of the art review.

Authors:  S Jacobs; T C Hillard
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  The association between statin use and outcomes potentially attributable to an unhealthy lifestyle in older adults.

Authors:  Amanda R Patrick; William H Shrank; Robert J Glynn; Daniel H Solomon; Colin R Dormuth; Jerry Avorn; Suzanne M Cadarette; Helen Mogun; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 4.  Hormone replacement therapy and risk of acute myocardial infarction : a review of the literature.

Authors:  Susan E Bromley; Corinne S de Vries; Dawn Thomas; Richard D T Farmer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Hormone replacement therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  Sánchez R Gabriel; L Carmona; M Roque; Gómez L M Sánchez; X Bonfill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

6.  The active comparator, new user study design in pharmacoepidemiology: historical foundations and contemporary application.

Authors:  Jennifer L Lund; David B Richardson; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 7.  Is low folate a risk factor for depression? A meta-analysis and exploration of heterogeneity.

Authors:  Simon Gilbody; Tracy Lightfoot; Trevor Sheldon
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Statin adherence and risk of accidents: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Colin R Dormuth; Amanda R Patrick; William H Shrank; James M Wright; Robert J Glynn; Jenny Sutherland; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Association of Nonadherence to Cancer Screening Examinations With Mortality From Unrelated Causes: A Secondary Analysis of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Dudith Pierre-Victor; Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview.

Authors:  Su Golder; Yoon K Loke; Martin Bland
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.