Literature DB >> 30589360

Layers of information: interacting constraints on breast cancer risk-management by high-risk African American women.

Tasleem J Padamsee1, Rachel Meadows1, Megan Hils1.   

Abstract

Objectives: To understand how various decision-making dynamics interact to shape the risk-management choices of African American women at high-risk of breast cancer, and to explore whether African American and White women have differential access to the information and interactions that promote proactive, confident risk-management behavior.Design: This paper draws on 50 original in-depth, semi-structured interviews with African American and White women at elevated risk of breast cancer. We used inductive grounded-theory methodology to explore the processes by which women make risk-management decisions and to compare those processes between racial groups. Moving backward from women's decisions about whether or not to engage in specific risk-management behaviors, we explored the patterns that underlie behavioral decisions.
Results: We find that decisions to engage in risk-management behavior rest on three accumulated layers of information. The layer most proximal to making risk-management decisions involves specific information about risk-management options; the middle layer involves general information about managing breast cancer risk; and the foundational layer involves personal perceptions of breast cancer risk and prevention. African American and White women experience distinct dynamics at each of these levels, and these differences may help explain racial differences in risk-management behavior. Compared to their White counterparts, African American women faced additional burdens at every step along the risk-management journey.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that information gathering is more complex than has previously been addressed, that information access and provider access are closely related, and that African American women may be systematically disadvantaged with respect to information-generating experiences. Preventing cancer morbidity and mortality requires that all high-risk women have access to the layers of information necessary to engage in cancer screenings and preventive interventions. These results exemplify the ways that structural, social, and interpersonal inequalities combine to influence risk-management choices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American women; Breast cancer prevention; family history; health disparities; high-risk women; qualitative research; racial differences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30589360      PMCID: PMC9529154          DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1562053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Health        ISSN: 1355-7858            Impact factor:   2.732


  54 in total

1.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Kathy A Lee; Noreen C Facione; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Disparities in cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities.

Authors:  Bethany Kolb; Anne Marie Wallace; Deidre Hill; Melanie Royce
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  Patterns and Trends in Age-Specific Black-White Differences in Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality - United States, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; S Jane Henley; Jacqueline W Miller; Greta Massetti; Cheryll C Thomas
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Long-term follow-up of Jewish women with a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation who underwent population genetic screening.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Nida Mian; Melissa Enmore; Aletta Poll; Marcia Llacuachaqui; Sonia Nanda; Ping Sun; Kevin S Hughes; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Long-term outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Claudine Isaacs; Kristi D Graves; Elizabeth Poggi; Beth N Peshkin; Christy Gell; Clinton Finch; Scott Kelly; Kathryn L Taylor; Lauren Perley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2015.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Jennifer E Axilbund; Michael Berry; Saundra S Buys; Beth Crawford; Meagan Farmer; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Seema Khan; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer K Litton; Lisa Madlensky; P Kelly Marcom; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Huma Rana; Gwen Reiser; Mark E Robson; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Alison Whelan; Myra J Wick; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary Dwyer; Rashmi Kumar; Susan Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ellen P McCarthy; Russell S Phillips; Risa B Burns
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007-11-26

9.  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome : the impact of race on uptake of genetic counseling and testing.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Nancie Petrucelli
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

10.  Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004-2009.

Authors:  Debra N Yeboa; Xiao Xu; Beth A Jones; Pamela Soulos; Cary Gross; James B Yu
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  Nurse practitioners have a vital role in achieving health equity in clinical cancer genetics.

Authors:  Grace-Ann Fasaye; Yi Liu; Kathleen Calzone
Journal:  J Am Assoc Nurse Pract       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.495

3.  Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Megan Hils; Anna Muraveva
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Association of Population Screening for Breast Cancer Risk With Use of Mammography Among Women in Medically Underserved Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.

Authors:  Candice Schwartz; Ifeanyi Beverly Chukwudozie; Silvia Tejeda; Ganga Vijayasiri; Ivy Abraham; Mylene Remo; Hiral A Shah; Maria Rojas; Alicia Carillo; Loraine Moreno; Richard B Warnecke; Kent F Hoskins
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.